• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

TikTok recommends porn and highly sexualised content to children, says report

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,719
46,774
Los Angeles Area
✟1,044,424.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
In late July and early August this year, researchers from campaign group Global Witness set up four accounts on TikTok pretending to be 13-year-olds.

They also turned on the platform's "restricted mode", which TikTok says prevents users seeing "mature or complex themes, such as… sexually suggestive content".

Without doing any searches themselves, investigators found overtly sexualised search terms being recommended in the "you may like" section of the app.

At its most extreme, the content included explicit pornographic films of penetrative sex.

These videos were embedded in other innocent content in a successful attempt to avoid content moderation.

Ava Lee from Global Witness said the findings came as a "huge shock" to researchers.

"TikTok isn't just failing to prevent children from accessing inappropriate content - it's suggesting it to them as soon as they create an account".

They informed TikTok, which said it had taken immediate action to resolve the problem.

But in late July and August this year, the campaign group repeated the exercise and found once again that the app was recommending sexual content.
 

lismore

Maranatha
Oct 28, 2004
20,989
4,640
Scotland
✟298,897.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Ava Lee from Global Witness said the findings came as a "huge shock" to researchers.
Unless it was their first time on the net I don't see how this would come as a shock. Even innocuous sites push weird and explicit pop ups, gambling promotion is another shocker. Kind regards.
 
Upvote 0

Hvizsgyak

Well-Known Member
Jan 28, 2021
1,076
446
61
Spring Hill
✟124,636.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Byzantine Catholic
Marital Status
Married
No calls for boycott from prominent right wing influencers?
I don't think anybody from the right wing uses TikTok (except maybe their kids and they probably don't let their parents know they are using it). If they do, "BOYCOTT IT NOW!!!". How was that? I personally would not allow a kid to have a cell phone until they are at least in High School. Unfortunately, most people would disagree with me so I'll have to pass my complaint onto Trump and see if he can executive order that proposal :D.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,826
21,769
30
Nebraska
✟857,001.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,211
15,733
Washington
✟1,016,166.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
The only problem is how to blame "The Left" for it.
The left in general has become known for promoting sexualized content for children because it's supposed to be progressive.\
It’s a societal problem. Not political.
It is political though. The pitch is 'vote for us because we support progressive ideas like sexualized content for children'.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
9,193
4,675
82
Goldsboro NC
✟270,893.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
The left in general has become known for promoting sexualized content for children because it's supposed to be progressive.\
It is political though. The pitch is 'vote for us because we support progressive ideas like sexualized content for children'.

Vote for us because we don't support the Right's ideas of sexualizing children.
 
Upvote 0

Trogdor the Burninator

Senior Veteran
Oct 19, 2004
6,284
2,935
✟294,721.00
Faith
Christian
Unless it was their first time on the net I don't see how this would come as a shock. Even innocuous sites push weird and explicit pop ups, gambling promotion is another shocker. Kind regards.

Another reason to adblock everything
 
Upvote 0

Servus

<><
Site Supporter
Oct 2, 2020
29,211
15,733
Washington
✟1,016,166.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Vote for us because we don't support the Right's ideas of sexualizing children.
Yep that too. It's just "progress". It's the new normal for little kids to know about being umpteen different genders and sexual orientations. "I'm an 8 year old non-binary gender-fluid two-spirit omnisexual".
 
  • Haha
Reactions: BCP1928
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,768
17,339
Here
✟1,497,503.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I would be mindful of the source on this one -- not referring to the BBC, I'm referring to the Global Witness NGO

I'll need to do some more research on "Global Witness" to see if they follow the same M.O. as other self-purported "watchdog" orgs.

That M.O. being - specifically select a platform/service for which they perhaps they have a political axe to grind, and then conduct small, targeted (unlikely to happen in the real world) experiments designed to expose edge-case failures that would be extremely unlikely to occur under normal operating conditions, and then portray it as a unique failure of that particular platform (when it fact, all of the other similar platforms have similar (unlikely) vulnerabilities.

MediaMatters did something very similar shortly after Elon purchased Twitter. (that was during the time where Twitter became "public enemy #1", but Facebook was still considered to be "one of the good ones"). They were specifically trying to prove that hate content was showing up next to reputable brands' ads as a means of getting people to divest in Twitter.

In that thread a few years back discussing that, I went through a 15 minute exercise with a sock puppet account to prove that vulnerability was just as prevalent on Facebook as it was on Twitter, and was able to produce this result.


1760015044911.png



So I would exercise the same level of caution on this one given the source of their funding, and their aligned groups, especially given the political backdrop of this coming right off the heels of other recent reporting suggesting that TikTok has become "more friendly" to right-wing views.
 
Upvote 0