Karoline Leavitt rebukes Democrats for not condemning Charlie Kirk's murder: 'Truly a sad moment'

BPPLEE · Friday at 2:05 PM

From the article

Leavitt criticized House Democrats who voted against a resolution last week to formally condemn his assassination, which split Democrats last Friday as 95 voted to approve the ceremonial measure, 58 voted against it, 38 voted present and 22 abstained
Detractors in the Congressional Black Caucus claimed the resolution was "an attempt to legitimize Kirk’s worldview — a worldview that includes ideas many Americans find racist, harmful, and fundamentally un-American," according to their statement.

"This was a simple gesture of human decency to denounce political violence," she said. "I wish I could say that this was only a fringe group, but 96 votes is nearly half of the entire House Democrat caucus."

"And they didn't just vote against this basic resolution condemning political violence," she said. "A number of those same Democrats took to the House floor to smear Charlie Kirk's name. The man wasn't even buried yet, and Democrat members of Congress were denigrating his memory on the floor of the House of Representatives."

Yarddog · Friday at 2:11 PM

BPPLEE said:
I would say nice try but it’s not even that good. You need to stop now. You just keep digging a deeper hole

Nope you need to start reading. You might learn something.

Yarddog · Friday at 2:21 PM

BPPLEE said:
From the article

"This was a simple gesture of human decency to denounce political violence," she said. "I wish I could say that this was only a fringe group, but 96 votes is nearly half of the entire House Democrat caucus."

Since they had already formerly condemn Charlie Kirk's murder there was no need to do it again.

BPPLEE said:
"And they didn't just vote against this basic resolution condemning political violence," she said. "A number of those same Democrats took to the House floor to smear Charlie Kirk's name.

They were explaining why they refused to honor his legacy which included claiming Biden should be executed and speaking down the Civil Rights Act and demeaning Martin Luther King.

He didn't deserve to die but he didn't deserve to be honored, either.

BPPLEE said:
The man wasn't even buried yet, and Democrat members of Congress were denigrating his memory on the floor of the House of Representatives."

That was the Republican's fault. Democrats wouldn't have said anything if Republicans hadn't pushed them to respond.

BPPLEE · Friday at 2:41 PM

Yarddog said:
Since they had already formerly condemn Charlie Kirk's murder there was no need to do it again.

They were explaining why they refused to honor his legacy which included claiming Biden should be executed and speaking down the Civil Rights Act and demeaning Martin Luther King.

He didn't deserve to die but he didn't deserve to be honored, either.

That was the Republican's fault. Democrats wouldn't have said anything if Republicans hadn't pushed them to respond.

None of this has anything to do with what you claimed. She was talking about Democrats who voted against or abstained from voting on the resolution.
All the stuff you posted about Democrats condemning the murder had nothing to do with what she was talking about.

BPPLEE · Friday at 2:41 PM

Yarddog said:
Nope you need to start reading. You might learn something.

At least I can learn

Yarddog · Friday at 3:29 PM

BPPLEE said:
None of this has anything to do with what you claimed.

Sure it does. Republicans are being petty trying to use this to make Democrats look petty.

BPPLEE said:
She was talking about Democrats who voted against or abstained from voting on the resolution.

That's right and I've said that already BUT Democrats have no need voting on a resolution which both honors Charlie Kirk and condemns violence because they've already condemned violence after Kirk's murder. If Republicans would have left the honor Kirk off of the resolution, Democrats would have voted for it

BPPLEE said:
All the stuff you posted about Democrats condemning the murder had nothing to do with what she was talking about.

Yes it did since she was condemning Democrats for not voting for the resolution to condemn violence. She knew that she was lying.

Yarddog · Friday at 3:30 PM

BPPLEE said:
At least I can learn

It doesn't doesn't seem like it because this is simple and most people know that Leavitt is lying.

Why should Democrats vote to honor Charlie Kirk?

BPPLEE · Friday at 3:41 PM

Yarddog said:
Sure it does. Republicans are being petty trying to use this to make Democrats look petty.

That's right and I've said that already BUT Democrats have no need voting on a resolution which both honors Charlie Kirk and condemns violence because they've already condemned violence after Kirk's murder. If Republicans would have left the honor Kirk off of the resolution, Democrats would have voted for it

Yes it did since she was condemning Democrats for not voting for the resolution to condemn violence. She knew that she was lying.

Lying? I’m done with this. You just keep doubling down on your own error

Vambram · Friday at 9:16 PM

Yarddog said:
The resolution which was a week later. Several Democrats voted against the resolution for the own reasons.

https://thehill.com/homenews/house/5512714-democrats-opposition-charlie-kirk-resolution/

I'm glad they refused to vote for the resolution. He shouldn't be honored by Democrats or Christians. Anyone who said that Joe Biden should be executed should not be honored. They would have voted on a resolution against political violence, which they had already done.

Prove it. Prove that Charlie Kirk said that Joe Biden should be executed.

Yarddog · Friday at 11:16 PM

BPPLEE said:
Lying? I’m done with this. You just keep doubling down on your own error

Open your eyes. She knows that Democrats had already condemned the murder.

Yarddog · Friday at 11:22 PM

Vambram said:
Prove it. Prove that Charlie Kirk said that Joe Biden should be executed.

What Charlie Kirk actually said about Biden getting 'the death penalty'

The Turning Point USA co-founder and conservative commentator was fatally shot while speaking at a Utah college.

www.snopes.com

Vambram · Saturday at 9:03 AM

Yarddog said:
What Charlie Kirk actually said about Biden getting 'the death penalty'

The Turning Point USA co-founder and conservative commentator was fatally shot while speaking at a Utah college.

www.snopes.com

Clearly, Kirk was saying that would only happen if Biden was put on trial and found guilty of treason.

Yarddog · Saturday at 10:35 AM

Vambram said:
Clearly, Kirk was saying that would only happen if Biden was put on trial and found guilty of treason.

Why would he want an innocent man put on trial? Why make such an insinuating statement when an a Congressional investigation couldn't find anything in four years of investigation? BUT, he didn't say what you claim. There's no "IF".

He said, "Joe Biden is a bumbling, dementia-filled Alzheimer's, corrupt, tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and/or given the death penalty for his crimes against America".

This is said right after he says this about Kamala Harris. "I know what you're thinking, we've got to get Joe Biden out of the way so we can run up against Kammy. Oh my goodness, is she beatable. It's like Black Hillary on steroids. Is she Black? I guess she says she's Caribbean or whatever. Doesn't matter. She gives these speeches, and it just has this aura of totalitarianism. My team says she is Indian and Caribbean".

He has no problem lying to his listeners which is not Christian.
.

Vambram · Saturday at 7:40 PM

Yarddog said:
Why would he want an innocent man put on trial? Why make such an insinuating statement when an a Congressional investigation couldn't find anything in four years of investigation? BUT, he didn't say what you claim. There's no "IF".

He said, "Joe Biden is a bumbling, dementia-filled Alzheimer's, corrupt, tyrant who should honestly be put in prison and/or given the death penalty for his crimes against America".

This is said right after he says this about Kamala Harris. "I know what you're thinking, we've got to get Joe Biden out of the way so we can run up against Kammy. Oh my goodness, is she beatable. It's like Black Hillary on steroids. Is she Black? I guess she says she's Caribbean or whatever. Doesn't matter. She gives these speeches, and it just has this aura of totalitarianism. My team says she is Indian and Caribbean".

He has no problem lying to his listeners which is not Christian.
.

He is not lying if he really believes that Joe Biden was not an innocent man.

Yarddog · Saturday at 7:42 PM

Vambram said:
He is not lying if he really believes that Joe Biden was not an innocent man

That's true but he's lying about Harris.

Karoline Leavitt rebukes Democrats for not condemning Charlie Kirk's murder: 'Truly a sad moment'

Well-Known Member

Senior Contributor

Senior Contributor

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Senior Contributor

Senior Contributor

Well-Known Member

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative

Senior Contributor

Senior Contributor

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative

Senior Contributor

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative

Senior Contributor

Similar threads