• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Charlie Kirk - Martyr or Political Activist?

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
16,280
1,828
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟326,897.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Another thing came to mind. Social media and the online world. On the one hand we have seen identity politics be cultivated from earlier decades. The political became the personal or the personal became the political. Either way politics was becoming more personal and encroaching into the private sphere.

But at the same time the internet was developed and then post 2000 social and legacy media and its created the perfect storm. Not only were culture wars being cultivated through identity politics. But also an environment where that culture war could go behind closed doors and attack people through words and narratives.

In other words a virtual and unreal world has been created which dehumanises because its behind a machine and screen. I think this has become a catalyst for increasing hate and detachment between people and making it easier for the volnurable to fall into that unreal virtual culture war that treats opposing voices as enermies to be taken out like in some video game.

There has been a rise in antisemetism, political assassinations and attacks. We seen this being cultivated prior by cancel culture where people were losing jobs. Now its losing life. The political climate now is that more people see violence as a legitimate means.

Whereas face to face interaction can make it more real. You see peoples eyes and experience human emotion and you see the reality of your thinking and behaviour as it really is. This helps bring things into perspective and makes it real.

So I think as the culture war was already heating up as a result of what I think was socially engineered over previous decades. So has the dehumanising of society through modern tech and media where people see others as unhuman and threats like some virus or cancer.

Which is sort of always the reason human evil happens. But in this case its a perfect storm of our own making and against ourselves.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
22,692
19,125
USA
✟1,111,083.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
Kirk was manufactured and promoted, like a rock band or an act. The monied donors of the political Right in the US are very strategic in how they have developed influence networks and campaigns.

The lack of questions regarding his background and resources is concerning. I observed similar behavior with Donald Trump and signs of hero worship. I see long-term problems with each and related risks I want no part of that’s why I stepped back. Everyone must decide for themselves.

~bella
 
  • Like
Reactions: stevevw
Upvote 0

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
16,280
1,828
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟326,897.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
Another problem I can see is that many commentators are defending Kirk for which they have a right. Trying to explain the whole thing and put some context to it. Not get into the politics but on the overall social and cultural phenomena.

The thought crossed my mind. If these commentators are defending their belief and position like Kirk are they not also now at risk. If there is so much hate out there for Kirk and the claims that he promoted hate to the point that he almost deserved what he got. How does this now sit with those who are taking the same position.

Are they now at risk. They are more or less saying the same thing and even being more forth right. Does this then make those who oppose Kirk even more forth right against anyone else who is the same. Where is the line now.

If this continues that hate is directed towards Kirk supporters like Kirk then it is inevitable that more will be attacked.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram

Vambram

Born-again Christian; Constitutional conservative
Site Supporter
Dec 3, 2006
8,198
5,894
60
Saint James, Missouri
✟398,706.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
  • Like
Reactions: Jerry N.
Upvote 0