• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Water and metabolism of humans

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,236
21,505
29
Nebraska
✟807,666.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Hello all!

I thought I should share some random facts.

Since water is a renewable resource, and humans (and animals) consume water to survive.

Is it true that the water we consume possibly passed through countless humans and animals since it's being recycled over and over again?

Also, human beings create water via our metabolism. Is that also consumed?

Peace
 

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,236
21,505
29
Nebraska
✟807,666.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,867
4,774
✟354,773.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Hello all!

I thought I should share some random facts.

Since water is a renewable resource, and humans (and animals) consume water to survive.

Is it true that the water we consume possibly passed through countless humans and animals since it's being recycled over and over again?

Also, human beings create water via our metabolism. Is that also consumed?

Peace
I asked GPT-5 a silly question and got a very serious answer.
"Is it possible the water used in the natron solution used to preserve Tutankhamun's internal organs in 1323 BC have ended up in modern day humans."

That’s a fascinating question — you’re really asking about whether the same water molecules that were part of Tutankhamun’s embalming natron solution could have eventually circulated into modern people.


The short answer: yes, it’s possible, though in an unimaginably diluted sense.


Here’s why:


  1. Water molecules are constantly recycled.
    • Water doesn’t get destroyed in normal Earth processes — it just moves through the hydrological cycle (evaporation, condensation, rain, rivers, oceans, groundwater, living organisms).
    • Some of the H₂O from the natron solution would have evaporated or seeped into soil.
  2. Timescale is more than enough.
    • 1323 BC is ~3,300 years ago. Water molecules cycle through the atmosphere in about 9–10 days, and the ocean in ~3,000 years. So there’s been time for essentially complete mixing into Earth’s water reservoirs.
  3. Mixing into the global water system.
    • Once evaporated, those water molecules would have mixed into clouds, rains, rivers, and oceans.
    • Over millennia, that means they’ve spread widely across the planet.
  4. Probability of re-use in humans.
    • Every sip of water today contains countless molecules that were once inside other organisms, ancient and modern.
    • By rough estimates, the number of water molecules in even a glass of water (~10²⁵) is so vast that the odds of some being the same as those once in Tutankhamun’s embalming solution are virtually certain.

So while no one today has a meaningful portion of “Tutankhamun’s embalming water” inside them, it’s almost certain that trace molecules from that natron solution have ended up being drunk, cycled through plants, animals, and people — including modern humans.


Would you like me to show you a quick back-of-the-envelope calculation of the likelihood of a glass of water today containing at least a few molecules from that natron solution?
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,867
4,774
✟354,773.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
I asked GPT-5 a silly question and got a very serious answer.
"Is it possible the water used in the natron solution used to preserve Tutankhamun's internal organs in 1323 BC have ended up in modern day humans."
Here is GPT-5's back of an envelope calculations.

Nice — let’s do a quick, careful back-of-the-envelope calculation. I’ll state assumptions up front, then show the math step-by-step and give the conclusion you can trust qualitatively.


Assumptions (reasonable, simple)​


  • Embalming natron solution volume that contacted the organs — assume 10 L (typical order-of-magnitude; final answer scales linearly with this).
  • Mass of Earth’s water ≈ 1.386 × 10²¹ kg, so volume ≈ 1.386 × 10²⁴ L (1 kg water ≈ 1 L).
  • 1 mole H₂O = 18.015 g. Avogadro’s number = 6.022 × 10²³ molecules/mol.
  • A glass of water = 250 mL = 0.25 L.
  • Complete mixing of those molecules into the global water reservoir over millennia (optimistic but reasonable for a rough probability).



Step-by-step arithmetic​


  1. Molecules per liter of water
    • 1 L water = 1000 g.
    • Moles per liter = 1000 g ÷ 18.015 g/mol.
      • 1000 ÷ 18.015 = 55.508... moles (I’ll keep 5 significant figures where helpful).
    • Molecules per liter = 55.508... mol × 6.022×10²³ mol⁻¹
      • 55.508 × 6.022 = 334.37 (compute digits: 55.508×6 = 333.048; + 55.508×0.022 = 1.221 ≈ 334.269 — round to 334.37)
      • So molecules per liter ≈ 3.344 × 10²⁵ molecules/L.
  2. Total water molecules on Earth
    • Earth water volume ≈ 1.386 × 10²⁴ L.
    • Total molecules ≈ (1.386 × 10²⁴ L) × (3.344 × 10²⁵ molecules/L)
      • Multiply coefficients: 1.386 × 3.344 = 4.634... (1.386×3 = 4.158; plus 1.386×0.344 = 0.476... total ≈ 4.634).
      • Exponent: 10²⁴ × 10²⁵ = 10⁴⁹.
      • So total ≈ 4.63 × 10⁴⁹ water molecules on Earth.
  3. Number of molecules in the embalming fluid (assumed 10 L)
    • Molecules in 1 L = 3.344 × 10²⁵ (from step 1).
    • For 10 L: 10 × 3.344 × 10²⁵ = 3.344 × 10²6 molecules.
  4. Fraction of Earth’s water molecules that came from Tutankhamun’s solution
    • Fraction f=3.344×10264.63×1049f = \dfrac{3.344 \times 10^{26}}{4.63 \times 10^{49}}.
    • Compute coefficient: 3.344 ÷ 4.63 ≈ 0.722 (3.344/4.63 → about 0.722).
    • Exponent: 10²6 / 10⁴9 = 10⁻²³.
    • So f≈0.722×10−23=7.22×10−24. f \approx 0.722 \times 10^{-23} = 7.22 \times 10^{-24}.
    In words: about 7.2 × 10⁻²⁴ of the Earth’s water molecules would be those that originally were in that 10 L of natron solution (after full global mixing).
  5. How many of those molecules are in a glass (0.25 L)?
    • Molecules in 0.25 L = 0.25 × 3.344 × 10²⁵ = 8.36 × 10²4 molecules.
    • Expected number of Tutankhamun molecules in the glass = (molecules in glass) × f
      = (8.36 × 10²4) × (7.22 × 10⁻²4).
    • Multiply coefficients: 8.36 × 7.22 ≈ 60.4 (8.36×7 = 58.52; +8.36×0.22 ≈1.839 → 60.36).
    • Exponent: 10²4 × 10⁻²4 = 10⁰ = 1.
    • So expected count ≈ 60 molecules.
  6. Probability none are present (Poisson approximation)
    • If expected number λ = 60, probability zero = e^(−λ) ≈ e^(−60) ≈ ~8 × 10⁻²7, effectively zero.
    • So for the 10 L embalming-volume assumption, a typical glass almost certainly contains some molecules from that solution.



Sensitivity to the embalming-volume assumption​


  • If the embalming fluid was 1 L instead of 10 L → expected ≈ 6 molecules per glass (λ=6). Probability zero ≈ e^(−6) ≈ 0.0025 (~0.25% chance none — still very likely at least one).
  • If it was only 0.1 L → expected ≈ 0.6 molecules per glass. Probability zero ≈ e^(−0.6) ≈ 0.55 (≈45% chance there is at least one molecule).
  • If the embalming amount was huge (100 L), expectations scale up (≈600 molecules per glass).



Important caveats / realities​


  • This is a molecular statement only. Molecules of ordinary H₂O are indistinguishable chemically once mixed (unless you track isotopes). You would not be able to identify a particular molecule as “from Tutankhamun” today.
  • I assumed full mixing with all Earth water; in reality, local hydrology and temporary sequestration (burial, adsorption in sediments, incorporation in minerals) may delay or partition some molecules, but over ~3,300 years global mixing is a fair simplifying assumption.
  • If you meant “could modern humans carry a macroscopic part of that original liquid” (like a measurable mass, milliliters), then no — those molecules are dispersed extremely thinly across all water on Earth. My calculation shows only a few dozen molecules per glass under reasonable assumptions, which is unimaginably tiny compared to any measurable volume.



Bottom line (short)​


Yes — virtually certain that a few individual water molecules from Tutankhamun’s natron solution have been incorporated into modern people’s bodies (and into the water we drink). The expected number in a typical 250 mL glass is on the order of tens of molecules if ~10 L were used — plenty to make it practically certain, but utterly negligible in amount and impossible to trace.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,236
21,505
29
Nebraska
✟807,666.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Warden_of_the_Storm

Well-Known Member
Oct 16, 2015
15,304
7,518
31
Wales
✟432,774.00
Country
United Kingdom
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
LOL! I love discussion! Is that so wrong?

It just feels... weird, whenever you post questions that can easily be looked up through search engines. Feels weird to me.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,236
21,505
29
Nebraska
✟807,666.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
It just feels... weird, whenever you post questions that can easily be looked up through search engines. Feels weird to me.
Ok! I understand. I was wondering if anyone had anything to add, is all :)

You have a valid point, though :)
 
Upvote 0

sjastro

Newbie
May 14, 2014
5,867
4,774
✟354,773.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Here is GPT-5's back of an envelope calculations.

Step-by-step arithmetic​


  1. Molecules per liter of water
    • 1 L water = 1000 g.
    • Moles per liter = 1000 g ÷ 18.015 g/mol.
      • 1000 ÷ 18.015 = 55.508... moles (I’ll keep 5 significant figures where helpful).
    • Molecules per liter = 55.508... mol × 6.022×10²³ mol⁻¹
      • 55.508 × 6.022 = 334.37 (compute digits: 55.508×6 = 333.048; + 55.508×0.022 = 1.221 ≈ 334.269 — round to 334.37)
      • So molecules per liter ≈ 3.344 × 10²⁵ molecules/L.
  2. Total water molecules on Earth
    • Earth water volume ≈ 1.386 × 10²⁴ L.
    • Total molecules ≈ (1.386 × 10²⁴ L) × (3.344 × 10²⁵ molecules/L)
      • Multiply coefficients: 1.386 × 3.344 = 4.634... (1.386×3 = 4.158; plus 1.386×0.344 = 0.476... total ≈ 4.634).
      • Exponent: 10²⁴ × 10²⁵ = 10⁴⁹.
      • So total ≈ 4.63 × 10⁴⁹ water molecules on Earth.
  3. Number of molecules in the embalming fluid (assumed 10 L)
    • Molecules in 1 L = 3.344 × 10²⁵ (from step 1).
    • For 10 L: 10 × 3.344 × 10²⁵ = 3.344 × 10²⁶ molecules.
  4. Fraction of Earth’s water molecules that came from Tutankhamun’s solution
    • Fraction f = 3.344×10²⁶/4.63×10⁴⁹.
    • Compute coefficient: 3.344 ÷ 4.63 ≈ 0.722 (3.344/4.63 → about 0.722).
    • Exponent: 10²⁶ / 10⁴⁹ = 10⁻²³.
    • So f ≈ 0.722×10⁻²³= 7.22×10⁻²⁴.
    In words: about 7.2 × 10⁻²⁴ of the Earth’s water molecules would be those that originally were in that 10 L of natron solution (after full global mixing).
  5. How many of those molecules are in a glass (0.25 L)?
    • Molecules in 0.25 L = 0.25 × 3.344 × 10²⁵ = 8.36 × 10² molecules.
    • Expected number of Tutankhamun molecules in the glass = (molecules in glass) × f
      = (8.36 × 10²) × (7.22 × 10⁻²).
    • Multiply coefficients: 8.36 × 7.22 ≈ 60.4 (8.36×7 = 58.52; +8.36×0.22 ≈1.839 → 60.36).
    • Exponent: 10² × 10⁻² = 10⁰ = 1.
    • So expected count ≈ 60 molecules.
  6. Probability none are present (Poisson approximation)
    • If expected number λ = 60, probability zero = exp(−λ) ≈ exp(−60) ≈ ~8 × 10⁻²⁷, effectively zero.
    • So for the 10 L embalming-volume assumption, a typical glass almost certainly contains some molecules from that solution.
The calculation is sound but incomplete it approximates the number of water molecules from Tutankhamun's natron embalming solution in a glass of water not in every living human being.

Let’s take my framework and push it to all living humans.




Step 1. Water content of an average human​


A typical adult is about 60% water by mass.


  • Average human mass ≈ 70 kg.
  • Water mass ≈ 0.6 × 70 ≈ 42 kg ≈ 42 L (since 1 L ≈ 1 kg).

So per person, ~42 L of water.




Step 2. Molecules in that water​


Molecules per liter we already calculated:

3.344 × 10²⁵ molecules/L
So per person:

42×3.344 × 10²⁵≈ 1.40×10²⁷ molecules of water.


Step 3. Fraction from Tutankhamun’s natron solution​


Fraction of Earth’s water molecules that came from that 10 L solution:

f ≈ 7.22 × 10⁻².


Step 4. Expected Tutankhamun molecules per person​

Expected count=(1.40×10²⁷)×(7.22 × 10⁻²).
Multiply coefficients: 1.40 × 7.22 ≈ 10.1.
Exponent: 10²× 10⁻² = 10³.


So:

≈ 1.01 x 10 (≈ 10,000 molecules per person).


Step 5. For all living humans​


World population ≈ 8.1 billion ≈ 8.1 × 10⁹.

(1.01 x 10)×(8.1 × 10⁹) ≈ 8.2×10¹³.
So globally, ~80 trillion water molecules from Tutankhamun’s embalming solution are currently in all living humans.




Answer:


  • Each living person today likely carries on the order of 10,000 water molecules from Tutankhamun’s natron solution (under the 10 L assumption).
  • Across all humanity, that’s about 8 × 10¹³ molecules total.



Do you want me to also run the 1 L and 0.1 L embalming-fluid scenarios (like we did before), to see how those scale in per-person numbers?
What started off as an absurd question has some credibility after all.:)
 
Upvote 0

dlamberth

Senior Contributor
Site Supporter
Oct 12, 2003
20,179
3,187
Oregon
✟947,502.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Politics
US-Others
Riley, I'm doing this in the nicest way possible...

But... you can use Google for these questions. It exists for a reason.
The question caused me to think about something I've never considered with water. Though I've heard something along the same lines with the air we breath. I'm glad the question was posted.
 
Upvote 0

Ophiolite

Recalcitrant Procrastinating Ape
Nov 12, 2008
9,345
10,212
✟289,883.00
Country
United Kingdom
Faith
Agnostic
Marital Status
Private
Since little of the nitrogen, which makes up 78% of the air, is recycled, we are breathing in molecules that have been around since early Earth history. Statistically there are likely to be molecules you are breathing in now that were previosuly breathed in by dinosaurs, Julius Caeser, the neighbour down the road who hosts noisy parties and anyone else, or breathing thing, you may care to think of. There is one obvious candidate that I would imagine would appeal, in a reflective way, to a Christian.

Edit: On the recycling of water, much (most?) of the water present in volcanic eruptions (typically 4%) got there via subduction of water laden sediments into the mantle and its subsequent incorporation in magma melts.
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
43,223
46,332
Los Angeles Area
✟1,035,284.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)
Is it true that the water we consume possibly passed through countless humans and animals since it's being recycled over and over again?
Certainly.

The usual example is about air molecules rather than water, but...

In fact, calculating the probability of a particle of Caesar’s dying breath appearing in any given liter of air (the volume of a deep breath) has become a classic exercise for chemistry and physics students. If you make a few assumptions about the mixing of gases and the lifetimes of molecules in the atmosphere, it turns out that, on average, one molecule of “Caesar air” — or any other historic liter of air, for that matter — appears in each breath you take.

So it's not just 'countless humans', but any/every specific human, and not even throughout their lifetime, but one of their breaths and one of your breaths.
Atoms are very very smol.
Also, human beings create water via our metabolism. Is that also consumed?
Water is water.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,236
21,505
29
Nebraska
✟807,666.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Certainly.

The usual example is about air molecules rather than water, but...

In fact, calculating the probability of a particle of Caesar’s dying breath appearing in any given liter of air (the volume of a deep breath) has become a classic exercise for chemistry and physics students. If you make a few assumptions about the mixing of gases and the lifetimes of molecules in the atmosphere, it turns out that, on average, one molecule of “Caesar air” — or any other historic liter of air, for that matter — appears in each breath you take.

So it's not just 'countless humans', but any/every specific human, and not even throughout their lifetime, but one of their breaths and one of your breaths.
Atoms are very very smol.

Water is water.
Very fascinating! Thanks for the response! :)
 
Upvote 0