Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
25 in 30,000,000...given that causation hasn't even been proven I think a reasonable person would see that as a "low risk" activity. Odds of being struck by lightening WITHIN THE CALENDAR YEAR are about 1 in 1.2mil...
This is a compilation of VAERS reports.
And they have verified the children are dead.
I read the blog you posted and reported some of what it said.Have you read the study? Can you provide the link?
I will totally admit I'm being third rate with my numbers.I guess we're just making up numbers now...
Still lower than dying from the vaccine.Do you know what the odds are of a child dying from a COVID infection? I'll give you a hint; CDC's own data showed that children were more likely to be killed in a bicycle accident than from COVID.
I read the blog you posted and reported some of what it said.
You're the one who claimed "study shows 25 children died as a result of the COVID vaccine."
1) IT's been made pretty clear that CDC and FDA is not necessarily a reliable scientific organization anymore as they are working backward from their bias.Look how anxious people are to dismiss this study without even reading it.
Still lower than dying from the vaccine.
25 "after the vaccine" (so not even FROM the vaccine).
or
just over 1,800 from 2020-2023
https://data.cdc.gov/widgets/nr4s-juj3?mobile_redirect=true
I did not.No, you said it was just a compilation of VAERS reports.
This is a compilation of VAERS reports. And they have verified the children are dead.
1) IT's been made pretty clear that CDC and FDA is not necessarily a reliable scientific organization anymore as they are working backward from their bias.
2) Causality has never even been close to being linked....and ultimately, everything comes down to causality. Otherwise it's a moot point that anyone died through that mechanism.
3) The fact that so few kids DID die, suggests that almost all kids' natural state CAN handle it. I would expect to hear that perhaps there was an "X factor" that endangered certain kids.
It's hard to say "the mRNA vaccine is dangerous" when 99.9986 of children didn't die from it.
There's no way to be a rational person and say that.
I would not say those two scenarios are comparable though I could be wrong.It's interesting that you recognize the difference between dying "after the vaccine" and "FROM the vaccine", but you don't seem to think the same issue exists with people dying "FROM COVID" vs. "WITH COVID".
No i do not. As close to agreeing with you on this point from me would be that it's "nakedly transparent whereas before there was a veneer of lack of bias".You don't think this same issue exists with the bias from regulatory agencies that have been almost completely captured by industry?
And yet for 3 years you've been inferring it.Given that neither of us have read the report, I'll reserve my thoughts concerning causality until I've examined the evidence.
Yes. Exception that almonst 100x more children died from COVID than AFTER the vaccine.You could say the exact same thing about COVID.
I did not.
I would not say those two scenarios are comparable though I could be wrong.
It could very well be that those 25 kids DID have something that compromised their system to that vaccine at that moment. And if this report is done properly, I'm sure it would delineate that information with great specificity.
In the same way that someone who has COVID and gets into a bad car accident and their airways are impacted COVID, I would say that COVID would be responsible
But again, calling the vaccine inherently dangerous with those numbers is simply NOT a reasonable thing to do.
No i do not.
Pre Trump:
1) The government did the testing and the industry paid for it. There's a seperation there; and the government at that time had no bias or PRAGMATIC interest in results of research.
Trump
2) The government tells us exactly what they are hoping to prove. They are doing the testing and they are paying for it.
And yet for 3 years you've been inferring it.
Yes. Exception that almonst 100x more children died from COVID than AFTER the vaccine.