zippy2006
Dragonsworn
- Nov 9, 2013
- 7,660
- 3,859
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Catholic
- Marital Status
- Single
I think the video is based in non sequitur reasoning. For example:What do you guys think?
Okay, but what does that have to do with the modern notion of equality? Giving others "basics like food and clothes" does not create equality in the modern sense of the word. No one advocating for equality would be satisfied if everyone were given food and clothing.I felt the video was more or less saying to serve others with basics like food and clothes when we see those around us in need.
The video claims that Jesus treated everyone equally, yet this is factually incorrect. He did not treat the Canaanite woman the same way he treated Hebrew women. He did not treat the Pharisees the same way he treated the Apostles. He did not treat those who had faith the same way he treated those who did not have faith.
The video tries to claim that references to Isaiah 40 are somehow about financial equality, which is quite the stretch. At the same time it conveniently ignores verses like the parable of the talents in Matthew 25, a parable which is grounded in an explicitly financial context, "For to every one who has will more be given, and he will have abundance; but from him who has not, even what he has will be taken away."
So I don't think it works. More generally, political agendas and Jesus' agenda don't usually go hand in hand.
Upvote
0