Carl Sagan wrote a great piece decades ago that refutes your argument. I'll let you Google it up. But you're getting off topic.It is simply indefensible - the rules of this forum notwithstanding.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Carl Sagan wrote a great piece decades ago that refutes your argument. I'll let you Google it up. But you're getting off topic.It is simply indefensible - the rules of this forum notwithstanding.
To prove that you and others have no morals and you drift to and fro.Under the law, if that were the law, then by definition it would not be murder. Why did you set up your hypothetical this way?
The topic is abortion. People keep claiming there is some magic argument out there, but they never share it.Carl Sagan wrote a great piece decades ago that refutes your argument. I'll let you Google it up. But you're getting off topic.
Not according to the Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.Oddly, now only the government is “allowed” to enslave people.
I thought that was what you were getting at but you framed the question in such a way that all you've actually done is highlight your own ignorance and assumptions.To prove that you and others have no morals and you drift to and fro.
That's unlikely and an inflammatory accusation. Watch yourself - take a breath and stop making unwarranted attacks.You would have been the slave-owners.
I'm not a Democrat, you know. And Democrats of the 1860s became the Republicans of the 1960s.The Dems were the slave-owners.
No such arguments are allowed here, so...The topic is abortion. People keep claiming there is some magic argument out there, but they never share it.
Read the whole thing:Not according to the Thirteenth Amendment to the US Constitution.
My argument is that what is or is not murder can get complicated - but not in regard to abortion.I thought that was what you were getting at but you framed the question in such a way that all you've actually done is highlight your own ignorance and assumptions.
Your hypothetical defined murder a certain way then asked if something were not how you defined it, would it be what you defined - obviously, it would not. That has absolutely nothing to do with my morals and everything to do with your lack of logic. I am not the drifter here.
In other words, another clumsy, failed got-cha.
You have given me no reason to believe that that would be unlikely.That's unlikely and an inflammatory accusation. Watch yourself - take a breath and stop making unwarranted attacks.
That never happened and you are not convincing me.I'm not a Democrat, you know. And Democrats of the 1860s became the Republicans of the 1960s.
I was speaking in the general.No such arguments are allowed here, so...
The topic is the anonymity of the doctors prescribing mail order abortion medication.The topic is abortion. People keep claiming there is some magic argument out there, but they never share it.
Like an executioner. Appropriate - but in this case they are not performing a public service.The topic is the anonymity of the doctors prescribing mail order abortion medication.