• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Trump administration appeals to some pro-life reproductive health care despite IVF push

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
183,789
66,995
Woods
✟6,016,229.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
President Donald Trump’s administration has started to incorporate some elements of pro-life reproductive health care into its policy goals, which pro-life advocates argue are alternatives to in vitro fertilization (IVF) procedures meant to address fertility problems.

So far the inclusion of these efforts has been limited and the president has remained consistent in supporting IVF as the major solution to fertility issues. Yet some Catholics and others in the pro-life movement have been urging these alternative approaches amid ethical concerns surrounding IVF, such as the millions of human embryos killed through the procedure.

Life-affirming options tend to focus on curing the root causes of infertility. This health care, which many practitioners call “restorative reproductive medicine,” can include charting one’s menstrual cycle, lifestyle and diet changes, and diagnosing and treating underlying conditions that lead to fertility struggles.

The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is currently considering grant applicants for an “infertility training center,” which is the most concrete plan to date to incorporate pro-life fertility care options within the administration’s policy goals.

Continued below.
 

LizaMarie

Newbie
Jan 17, 2015
1,471
1,219
✟207,794.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Ugh IVF exploits women. I wish it was banned.
I have friends (one in my church) who conceived children this way so I’m quiet about my opposition to it outside this forum. They did it the right way as far as used the wife’s eggs husbands sperm and she carried her twins but they do have leftover embryos I think they’re conflicted about what to do with. I think the RCC is right about IVF. I’m more concerned when it’s donor eggs and sperm Or surrogacy
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0