Yes and I think that satan moves with the times. We have as a society become very relativistic as though this in itself is a truth even for the church.
You know, I have seen this relativism taking over the world of Christianity.
For example, truth is relative to billions. There is now "my truth" and "your truth", and both are acceptable to God.
Spirituality is no longer fixed to what the scriptures say about it.
The meaning of spirituality has developed and expanded over time, and various meanings can be found alongside each other.
As you said, we live in times of change, and many are conforming. If you don't, "it's you that has the problem".
Jesus showed where the problem lies though. He refused to be fashioned by the "cultural norms". John 16:33
Rationalisations have become good at finding ideas and beliefs that muddy the waters making it easier to manipulate the truth. The longer the time the better the lies become that its not so obvious to the average person.
The fact that you know this, along with a few millions, tells us that we can all know it... if we want to.
It's quite logically a fact.
I think so. Humility seems to be a central quality and especially in a self centered world. And I think from humility the decerning factor is self sacrifice. This is the ultimate meaning of humility under Christ as opposed to the world. This is a adical idea that the world seems to think is unreal and even weak.
Self centered world?
You must be out of your mind!!!
Can't you see the world is the more loving now than it ever as been?

I'm being sarcastic, obviously.
As Jesus and Paul said, the world is indeed more self-centered than ever before, and will continue to get worse.
Matthew 24:13; 2 Timothy 3:1-4, 13
To be humble in this world, is going to call for change.
I have had to make great changes to develop humility, and I am still making changes, because developing humility does not come overnight, and one has to continually try to keep pride from resurfacing.
But the one aspect they could never bring any charge against is that like Christ His sacrifice for others was out of love for another. There is no other rational. Unless some will say this is unreal and evidence the person is mad. But this can never account for such an act or disposition based on the belief in Christ.
I think based on the fact that there is a physical church. Paul gives instructions on how this is to be setup. So I would think that a church that practices such teachings as close to the original will be more in line.
For me the early church say from around 34AD to perhaps maybe 150AD before it began to be undermined is the best example. Ant church that can trace their history to the apostles is closer than those who don't. At least in the bare bones apects. I know some or most churches have added other stuff. But that is more about the fringe rituals ect.
So many will claim they can trace their history to the apostles, and some have done so.
Yet the pattern left by Jesus and his followers, from 29 AD to 90+ CE is not visible in them.
Actually, some have felt they were being bullied into following the pattern, and that's what led to them gathering teachers for themselves to tickle their itching ears.
However, Paul said no. This is actually Christ' commission. "Preach the word", he said. "do the work of an evangelist, make full proof of thy ministry."
Many looked down on the work, and that is why it waned, and came to a stop, shortly after the Apostolic Age.
This can be confirmed by historical
documentation.
Even reports today, such as
this 2025 report, confirm this truth.
So ideas like having a properly qualified overseer according to the teachings and say the breaking of the bread as central. Churches that at least practice these is closer than say those who completely reject this. Who may have compromised the qualification of overseers and replaced the breaking of bread with some modern idea or dismissed it altogether.
The scriptures say of the early church... they continued stedfastly in the apostles’ doctrine and fellowship, and in breaking of bread, and in prayers. And they, continuing daily with one accord in the temple, and breaking bread from house to house, (Acts 2:42-46)
That certainly described the fellowship those joining themselves to the Lord's Church enjoyed.
The scriptures added...
Praising God, and having favour with all the people. And the Lord added to the church daily such as should be saved. (Acts 2:47)
How did the Lord add to the church daily such as should be saved?
Paul said, in line with his words to peach the word, and fully accomplish your ministry (2 Timothy 4:1-5)...
All this is from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ and gave us the ministry of reconciliation 2 Corinthians 5:18
What's the "
ministry of reconciliation"?
Is it not what allows for God's will to be done?1 Timothy 2:3, 4
Is it not what Paul said was most important to the holy ones - the Saints? 2 Corinthians 6:3-10; Acts 20:17-30
Did you notice what that is?
If the breaking of bread, and being a clergy, replaces that, would that really be a mark of the Church of Christ?
A progressive church is like progressive politics that aligns with social norms as they progress. If we take say marriage for example. Secular progressives support the idea of redefining marriage according to modern ideas and beliefs.
Some churches also align with these as they believe this is showing Christs true love of inclusion. So as social norms progress beyond traditional norms which were based on the bible some churches are reinterpreting tradition as being outdated and unloving and therefore believe that we should be open to change.
Oh.. okay.
Something like this then? Romans 12:2
Which contrasts Romans 12:1, 3?
I think so. In all the arguements and narratives and counter claims as to truth its hard to navigate all this purely based on words and narratives as there is nothing grounded.
But living Christs teachings actually grounds the words. It gives a tangible aspect to draw upon. Now others may refer to other religions or even secular examples. All well and good. But I think there is something particular about Christs example that cannot be mimicked or disputed.
In some ways it is quite radical to all that has come before and after even in religious terms. Perhaps this is the point. Its so simple and radically different to this world that it has lasted. It gets at something at the core of truth and life that cannot be denied. Though some will deny this they can never fault it.
Interesting that you used the word "simple". I agree it's simple. Yet only the humble attain it. That certainly identifies God's work.