- Oct 17, 2009
- 43,028
- 13,630
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Single
Hahaha! The last part of my post is contained in the thread title. So yeah, it's relevant.None of this is relevant.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Hahaha! The last part of my post is contained in the thread title. So yeah, it's relevant.None of this is relevant.
But we don’t know why the defendants have been released.Hahaha! The last part of my post is contained in the thread title. So yeah, it's relevant.
We're not talking about mobs or protestors. We are talking about a specific attack in DC.Hahaha! The last part of my post is contained in the thread title. So yeah, it's relevant.
Surely you're already aware that most prisoners will be released into society at large when they've served their terms? In the meantime, let's make the prisons safe for the prisoners and guards.Then let's empty out the prisons and put them all back out there since all those prisoners are part of society. Your neighborhood could be the first place they go. Do you still think they're part of society now?
The article contains allegations and speculation.The article being referenced would inform you of that.
Why are you trying to make this about me? That comment was an aside. The judge released the accused into custody and detention - a more economical alternative to having them rot in jail while awaiting trial and now giving them full freedom.Why is everything about Trump with you? This thread certainly isn't. It's about a Biden-appointed judge releasing a violent criminal.
Jesse Smollet had injuries allegedly proving he was assaulted until it was proven not to be true.The injury to the man who was assaulted proves he was assaulted, and there was the teens. Figure it out.
It's good to know you're not a prosecutor though, I doubt you'd be a very succesful one with arguments like this.The injury to the man who was assaulted proves he was assaulted, and there was the teens. Figure it out.
I'm addressing the issue of Biden-appointed judges releasing people who are involved in mob violence. What happened in DC is just another example of it. For you to say it's not relevant is simply an attempt to not address it.We're not talking about mobs or protestors. We are talking about a specific attack in DC.
Actually, it's about a particular teenager involved in mob violence who is not in jail awaiting trial. That's the whole point. And it's not even being addressed. Only dismissed.Surely you're already aware that most prisoners will be released into society at large when they've served their terms? In the meantime, let's make the prisons safe for the prisoners and guards.
Anyway, this particular discussion is about teenagers in jail awaiting trial, not convicts in prison.
Well that's quite the construct you've built.I'm addressing the issue of Biden-appointed judges releasing people who are involved in mob violence.
It isn't. This (to my understanding) wasn't a "mob". It was either a group of teens on street that got in to a confrontation with some doofus in a nice car, or it was a criminal enterprise looking for victims to carjack. (The reporting that I've seen isn't clean. I am aware of the specific claims made through heavy commentary and I am not taking a stand on the exact nature, but nothing about it strikes me as anything like the "mobs" you have quoted in "analogy". Therefore the connection you are making to differences in treatment are irrelevant.What happened in DC is just another example of it. For you to say it's not relevant is simply an attempt to not address it.
A mob of two! Allegedly involved in violence, awaiting trial. And you want the two teenagers punished now rather than given due process. Which one of the two are you mad about not being kept in jail?Actually, it's about a particular teenager involved in mob violence who is not in jail awaiting trial. That's the whole point.
Points addressed. Pointer dismissed.And it's not even being addressed. Only dismissed.
I'm addressing the issue of Biden-appointed judges releasing people who are involved in mob violence. What happened in DC is just another example of it. For you to say it's not relevant is simply an attempt to not address it.
Is that the only violent crime you believe has happened in D.C.?Further point addressed: this alleged incident provided the impetus for Trump's takeover of the city, going so far as to deploying the military on the safest streets in the city. Now Hegseth wants to arm the military against the civilians - for a failed carjacking!
Did I say it was? No? Then you've made a straw man, congratulations!Is that the only violent crime you believe has happened in D.C.?
Thankfully, Trump is getting those numbers down: District Crime Data at a Glance | mpdc
I asked you the question. That's different from reciting what you said.Did I say it was? No? Then you've made a straw man, congratulations!
It sounds like you believe that "this alleged incident" is the reason for Trump addressing DC's crime problem as opposed to the very high rate of crime that already existed there. So I asked the question to get you to clarify.Further point addressed: this alleged incident provided the impetus for Trump's takeover of the city, going so far as to deploying the military on the safest streets in the city. Now Hegseth wants to arm the military against the civilians - for a failed carjacking!
That is a ridiculous question that appears to be rhetorical, not real. If you seriously suppose I think that. then I question your ability to understand simple conversations - which is why I don't think you were serious.I asked you the question. That's different from reciting what you said.
Again, do you believe that this carjacking attempt is he only violent crime you believe has happened in D.C.? I'm asking you based on a statement you actually made:
Yes, this alleged incident is the excuse that Trump used for his governmental overreach. DC's crime problem is not a very high rate compared to some of the red cities or even compared to what it was during Trump's first term. How is a falling crime rate - 30 year low, iirc - an emergency? It isn't, it's an excuse.It sounds like you believe that "this alleged incident" is the reason for Trump addressing DC's crime problem as opposed to the very high rate of crime that already existed there.
Really? It seems like you asked the question to mock.So I asked the question to get you to clarify.
He must have the same self regenerative genes that miraculously healed Trump’s ear.That is a ridiculous question that appears to be rhetorical, not real. If you seriously suppose I think that. then I question your ability to understand simple conversations - which is why I don't think you were serious.
Yes, this alleged incident is the excuse that Trump used for his governmental overreach. DC's crime problem is not a very high rate compared to some of the red cities or even compared to what it was during Trump's first term. How is a falling crime rate - 30 year low, iirc - an emergency? It isn't, it's an excuse.
Really? It seems like you asked the question to mock.
![]()
‘Big Balls’ Posts ‘Recovery’ Workout Video After Bloody D.C. Attack
The teenager has risen to MAGA stardom since being assaulted earlier this month.www.thedailybeast.com
Remarkable recovery - no bruises, no scratches, no black eye at all! He is quite the healer!
![]()
I think we can count that bloody nose (as posted from the scene of the crime) as not involving a broken nose.Remarkable recovery - no bruises, no scratches, no black eye at all! He is quite the healer!
I didn't suppose anything. I simply asked, and still haven't heard your answer.That is a ridiculous question that appears to be rhetorical, not real. If you seriously suppose I think that. then I question your ability to understand simple conversations - which is why I don't think you were serious.
Yes, this alleged incident is the excuse that Trump used for his governmental overreach. DC's crime problem is not a very high rate compared to some of the red cities or even compared to what it was during Trump's first term. How is a falling crime rate - 30 year low, iirc - an emergency? It isn't, it's an excuse.
And I'm happy to have corrected you about that.Really? It seems like you asked the question to mock.
The human body is able to heal. Still no excuse for a mob of thugs to attack him.![]()
‘Big Balls’ Posts ‘Recovery’ Workout Video After Bloody D.C. Attack
The teenager has risen to MAGA stardom since being assaulted earlier this month.www.thedailybeast.com
Remarkable recovery - no bruises, no scratches, no black eye at all! He is quite the healer!
![]()
Are you claiming that the police photos were fake?I think we can count that bloody nose (as posted from the scene of the crime) as not involving a broken nose.
You supposed a basis for that ridiculous question.I didn't suppose anything.
Then open your ears.I simply asked, and still haven't heard your answer.
For a lot of people, the BLM demonstrations were an excuse to riot, notably for Antifa and the Proud Boys as well as for opportunists looking to loot. At the same time, the demonstrations were the result of a buildup of frustration after not just years of police abuse but of the failure to hold police accountable for such abuse.That would be like saying the riots after George Floyd died was an excuse to riot, while people on your side would say it was the result of a buildup of frustration after years of police abuse.
That's a false equivalence. Crime has been going down and is now at a thirty year low. The residents of DC, who are the ones most affected by crime, do not want Trump's overreach and hostile takeover of their city. Even worse, most the military patrols are in tourist areas where historically low crime rates are even lower.But now you ignore the frustration of DC's high crime rate and that people finally are accepting that something be done about it.
His forces are there to provoke a riot, imo, so he can extend the 30 day "emergency".. NOTE: Trump didn't advocate for conservatives to riot about it.
Then how the heck did you come up with such a ridiculous question?And I'm happy to have corrected you about that.
Odd comment as that is not the reason given that he was allegedly attacked.The human body is able to heal. Still no excuse for a mob of thugs to attack him.
No. Not now, not in the post you are responding to, and not in the post that was linked a few days ago to which I initially commented about his bloody nose.Are you claiming that the police photos were fake?
I have repeatedly referred to the assault on "big balls" (or what ever the teen's name is) as a crime. You make false accusations against me.Either way, I'm glad to see you acknowledge that a crime was in fact committed against him.