- Oct 29, 2017
- 64,684
- 10,738
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Private
Where did that come from?I must have missed where it was stated that Federal workers were doing the work of logging.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Where did that come from?I must have missed where it was stated that Federal workers were doing the work of logging.
This is PERFECT! I love this hypothetical for two reasons.Good grief - if the man came out tomorrow with a cure for cancer the headlines would read "Trump puts thousands of doctors out of work"
This is PERFECT! I love this hypothetical for two reasons.
1.there is ABSOLUTELY NO WAY that trump could EVER find a cure for cancer but because this is hypothetical land we have to play along with the IDEA that Trump could do something those good AND useful.
2.
https://www.reuters.com/business/he...yoffs-health-agencies-sources-say-2025-04-01/
US veterans agency lost thousands of ‘core’ medical staff under Trump, records show
so Trump has lost quite a few medical personnel.
When you're trying to prove how overreactive his critics are you may wanna not actually put a real world outcome of a criticism of Trump.
This is an expression of absolute knowledge; but only YHWH has absolute knowledge.1.there is ABSOLUTELY NO WAY that trump could EVER find a cure for cancer
He is not only not working on a cure for cancer, he is actively working against cures for cancer by clawing back grants and funding while at the same time crippling the EPA from protecting clean air and water.The reader will note.I never said that Trump found a cure for cancer. I never said he was working on a cure for cancer. It was obviously a hypothetical. Thank the poster above for abundantly demonstrating what an overreaction looks like.
I breath Chinese air. Trump has no control over that; but he might reduce their emissions by bring industry back here to the good old US of A. Of course that will hurt the fat cats who benefit form the Chinese slave labor that is making them rich; as American workers struggle to pay their bills. How is the EPA crippled from protecting clean water?He is not only not working on a cure for cancer, he is actively working against cures for cancer by clawing back grants and funding while at the same time crippling the EPA from protecting clean air and water.
Trump does have control over his budget requests for cancer research budgets.I breath Chinese air. Trump has no control over that
What does that have to do with Chinese air pollution?Trump does have control over his budget requests for cancer research budgets.
Cancer experts alarmed over ‘gut-wrenching’ Trump plan to cut research spending by billions
LOL - over reaction number twoHe is not only not working on a cure for cancer, he is actively working against cures for cancer by clawing back grants and funding while at the same time crippling the EPA from protecting clean air and water.
What a useful response.This is an expression of absolute knowledge; but only YHWH has absolute knowledge.
With all of the CAPS, that statement has the look and feel of Truth Social. As the Left continues to slide in the polls; there is much that they could do to cling to their power, by emulating MAGA.
I was commenting on how much I loved your hypothetical. So clearly I knew Trump didn't cure cancer. Of course he did cut funding for doctors so that part isnt hypothetical is it?The reader will note.I never said that Trump found a cure for cancer. I never said he was working on a cure for cancer. It was obviously a hypothetical. Thank the poster above for abundantly demonstrating what an overreaction looks like.
Sure, too bad about the air and water, though.I breath Chinese air. Trump has no control over that; but he might reduce their emissions by bring industry back here to the good old US of A. Of course that will hurt the fat cats who benefit form the Chinese slave labor that is making them rich; as American workers struggle to pay their bills. How is the EPA crippled from protecting clean water?
I'm grateful for the work that Trump is doing to remove toxins from our food. MAHA!
Well by gum that's a whooole lot of readingSure, too bad about the air and water, though.
![]()
EPA's Endangerment Finding is critical for clean air and the climate. Lee Zeldin and the Trump administration want to repeal it.
Lee Zeldin's proposed Endangerment Finding repeal will make our air dirtier, our energy more expensive, and our planet less healthy. Here's what you need to know.www.lcv.org
EPA is about to lose a major tool that allows it to keep energy costs low and regulate pollution. The pending repeal of EPA’s Endangerment Finding will make our air dirtier, our energy more expensive, and our planet less healthy. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and President Trump are behind this effort to enrich Big Polluters at our expense....
The Trump administration is exempting dozens of chemical manufacturers, oil refineries, coal plants, medical device sterilizers and other polluters from Clean Air Act rules....The limits are aimed at reducing the releases of toxic chemicals, including those that cause cancer. One rule that the Trump administration is exempting about 50 polluters from would have been expected to reduce cancer risks of people living within 6 miles of a chemical plant by 96 percent.The Trump administration touted its decision as being supportive of fossil fuels and manufacturing....
- One proclamation exempts about 40 medical device sterilizing plants from requirements to reduce 90 percent of their emissions of cancer-causing ethylene oxide.
- Another exempts more than 50 chemical manufacturers and oil refineries from requirements to cut emissions of toxic chemicals including ethylene oxide and another cancer-linked chemical called chloroprene.
- A third proclamation exempts eight producers of taconite iron ore, which is used to make steel, from requirements to reduce mercury emissions by about 33 percent. Fetal exposure to mercury is linked to brain and nervous system damage.
- The fourth proclamation exempts six coal plants from restrictions on releases of mercury, nickel, arsenic and lead. The Biden-era rule in question was expected to reduce exposure to substances that can cause developmental delays in children, as well as heart attacks and cancer.
A bunch of leftist scare mongering, written by a leftist writer. The EPA has been over regulating for many years now, going way above and beyond safety measures. Making more and more demands on our manufacturers which make it more and more difficult for us and t are away our manufacturing.Sure, too bad about the air and water, though.
![]()
EPA's Endangerment Finding is critical for clean air and the climate. Lee Zeldin and the Trump administration want to repeal it.
Lee Zeldin's proposed Endangerment Finding repeal will make our air dirtier, our energy more expensive, and our planet less healthy. Here's what you need to know.www.lcv.org
EPA is about to lose a major tool that allows it to keep energy costs low and regulate pollution. The pending repeal of EPA’s Endangerment Finding will make our air dirtier, our energy more expensive, and our planet less healthy. EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin and President Trump are behind this effort to enrich Big Polluters at our expense....
The Trump administration is exempting dozens of chemical manufacturers, oil refineries, coal plants, medical device sterilizers and other polluters from Clean Air Act rules....The limits are aimed at reducing the releases of toxic chemicals, including those that cause cancer. One rule that the Trump administration is exempting about 50 polluters from would have been expected to reduce cancer risks of people living within 6 miles of a chemical plant by 96 percent.The Trump administration touted its decision as being supportive of fossil fuels and manufacturing....
- One proclamation exempts about 40 medical device sterilizing plants from requirements to reduce 90 percent of their emissions of cancer-causing ethylene oxide.
- Another exempts more than 50 chemical manufacturers and oil refineries from requirements to cut emissions of toxic chemicals including ethylene oxide and another cancer-linked chemical called chloroprene.
- A third proclamation exempts eight producers of taconite iron ore, which is used to make steel, from requirements to reduce mercury emissions by about 33 percent. Fetal exposure to mercury is linked to brain and nervous system damage.
- The fourth proclamation exempts six coal plants from restrictions on releases of mercury, nickel, arsenic and lead. The Biden-era rule in question was expected to reduce exposure to substances that can cause developmental delays in children, as well as heart attacks and cancer.
and look at all the examples you gave to peove your point.A bunch of leftist scare mongering, written by a leftist writer. The EPA has been over regulating for many years now, going way above and beyond safety measures.
And who cares about us citizens or consumers right?Making more and more demands on our manufacturers which make it more and more difficult for us and t are away our manufacturing.
Poisoning the well with a dash of ad hom. Dispute the facts, if you can.A bunch of leftist scare mongering, written by a leftist writer.
The regulations return the costs of production to the ones who profit rather than to the general public which suffers from health costs and cleanup costs.The EPA has been over regulating for many years now, going way above and beyond safety measures. Making more and more demands on our manufacturers which make it more and more difficult for us and t are away our manufacturing.
Yes and we need them, to a point. They have gone beyond what is necessary. Just cause rhere is a regulation doesn't mean it was necessary. Sometimes they are rules that handicap a company that aren't necessary.You do know thar regulations get put into place to PROTECT CONSUMERS and cirizens right?
They aren't a bunch of random rules put in to purposefully handicap a company.
Yup and some are good. There was some concern that he might go too far, but so far it hasnt happened.There were soo many fans of rfk bwcause they were looking forward to all rhe protective regulations he was going to put in plqce to control bad chemicals in youe food system.
A little hystrionic don't you think? Its kind of a ridiculous statement.And who cares about us citizens or consumers right?
Part of the reason for tariffs is to aid manufacturing in the US.If you're worries about manufacturing tell Trump to stop with the tarriffs
There is no evidence presented that proves these roll backs of some regulations will be harmful. Most of rhe roll backs will be going to back to regulations before Obama increased them.Poisoning the well with a dash of ad hom. Dispute the facts, if you can.
The regulations return the costs of production to the ones who profit rather than to the general public which suffers from health costs and cleanup costs.
and look at all the examples you gave to peove your point.
You do know thar regulations get put into place to PROTECT CONSUMERS and cirizens right?
They aren't a bunch of random rules put in to purposefully handicap a company.
There were soo many fans of rfk bwcause they were looking forward to all rhe protective regulations he was going to put in plqce to control bad chemicals in youe food system.
And who cares about us citizens or consumers right?
If you're worries about manufacturing tell Trump to stop with the tarriffs