childeye 2
Well-Known Member
- Aug 18, 2018
- 5,898
- 3,324
- 67
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
I would like to contribute to your thread. First let me thank you for your threads. For me, they're therapeutic.God is love and for love to be love, it must be freely given, else what is it? A display of the power of the Almighty? God does not need to display His power. He knows it unto Himself and does not require His creation
Double predestination delays his power. Love with free will displays His Glory, of which we will sing for eternity
I have a heart for my Calvinists friends, but I could no longer join them in their theology
I would be interested which points of Catholic theolgy with which you disagree
For I have already indicated to you in another thread that the inquisition obviously brings into question the validity of apostolic succession, and it actually felt good in my soul to get that off my chest. And that's all I wanted to say about that.
But here I would like to comment on God displaying His Power, God's Spirit as an incorruptible Love, and your application of the sentiment 'free will' above.
When people reference the will, the terms volition and/or desire come to mind as pertains to the term "Will". The term 'Free' is actually an adjective if it is meant to imply an uncoerced will. My immediate point here is that the term "free" must be qualified so as to comprehend what the will is free from, so as not to be redundant when describing the "will", and also so that the term 'free' doesn't become fluid and morph through subjective meanings when saying it and hearing it.
Having said that, the greater point I wish to make is that I would NOT agree that God giving us of His Spirit so as to bestow upon us His Characteristics of kindness, graciousness, caring compassion, or charitableness, would qualify as coercion since these attributes are qualities that are Light to the soul. I would even say that the only coherent meaning of a freewill in the moral/immoral context, would be a will free from the disability of sin.
Moreover, sin is corruption of that which was once pure. The first commandment is Love God with all your heart mind and soul. I therefore surmise that if I had no Love in my heart, mind and soul, I could not even care that I had no Love in my heart mind and soul.
So, as pertains to God displaying His Power, scripture speaks of the power of the cross preached through the Gospel and I interpret that as the displaying of the Incorruptible Love crucified on a cross by a wicked world. And that without this Image of God in my heart, I would probably remain subjugated under the image of the god of this world, and I would be without The Holy Spirit to convict me of sin that I would otherwise not even see.
2 Corinthians 4:3-5
3 But if our gospel be hid, it is hid to them that are lost:
4 In whom the god of this world hath blinded the minds of them which believe not, lest the light of the glorious gospel of Christ, who is the image of God, should shine unto them.5 For we preach not ourselves, but Christ Jesus the Lord; and ourselves your servants for Jesus' sake.
John 8:44
Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because there is no truth in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar, and the father of it.
1 John 3:10
In this the children of God are manifest, and the children of the devil: whosoever doeth not righteousness is not of God, neither he that loveth not his brother.
Last edited:
Upvote
0