Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I didn't create this thread to talk about the Epstein files. Why can't you abide to staying on topic? The next time you start a thread on a particular topic, maybe I should join it to talk about something else and see how you like it.
Trump is the one who said he would release it. Trump is the one now covering it up. The cognitive dissonance is yours to deal with. I really don’t care that he’s covering for his old rapist friend. That’s you guys he lied to about it, not me.
It happens. It's what goes on in forums, I suppose. Hey, maybe what you want to talk about then, will be more interesting than what I want to talk about, and others will join you.
Apparently society thinks that fraud to cover up an affair with a porn star is more punishable than an old pervert walking into a girl's dressing room. So Trump is a convicted felon for the former, but not the latter.
Sure. The definition of assault covers even a threat to batter a person. He was an idiot to waste a perfectly good sandwich on those guys, quite apart from the crime. The blowback over Bondi's jowl-quivering outrage over a tossed sandwich provided a good deal of amusement among rational Americans.
You can hardly blame Americans for inferring that Trump is covering up for a reason. It might be for any number of things, one of which could be that he was molesting kids with Epstein. Given his documented behavior and history of committing sexual assault, it's not an irrational suspicion.
Yep. The case went to court and he was found guilty of covering up having sex with a porn star. Both him and her are adults not children. And yet he still won the election. Go figure.
A suspicion is not evidence. There are many people wrongly convicted of crimes they did not commit in prison because of assumptions and suspicions. Check the innocent project if you have doubts. There is no objective evidence of your accusations.
There was another politicians who was a convicted felon and won enough votes in an election to be made chancellor. Guess who.
Yep.
But evidence supports suspicion. Trump's history and his attempts to cover up have justifiably aroused the suspicions of most Americans.
But there is no objective evidence and suspicion is not evidence. As I said, and you ignored, there are many wrongly convicted people in prison because of allegations and suspicion. You need objective evidence.
Of course it's nor going to happen.
It's not the first time a crooked politician tried to overturn our democracy. Hopefully, we'll get these guys like we got them each time before.
Those convictions, Trump's observed creeping into girl's dressing rooms, his documented history of sexual assault are all facts. That's what evidence is.
Suspicion is based on evidence. Trump, as you know, could end all of it, by just coming clean and making those files public. But since he did a 180 and now claims that they don't exist, that's a problem.
Homeless encampments have been cleared out of cities all over the country for a long time. Gavan Newsome did an enormous sweep through of San Francisco for the visit from the President of China.
Other than covering up having an affair with a porn star (both adults) and “words” you have no evidence. The “documented” sexual assault did not result in charges or a conviction so is a non stater since it would not be admissible in court.
You can’t convict on suspicion.
