Trump Threatens Federal Takeover of Washington After Member of DOGE Is Assaulted

But his history of creeping on underage females is evidence. His bragging about getting away with sexual assault is evidence. The court decision that found he had sexually assaulted a woman is evidence. Motive and opportunity.

No point in denial, really. Trump could, if he wanted, just come clean and clear his name with the files.

Assuming that they don't implicate him, of course.

Hentenza said:

Again, you still have no evidence.

Click to expand...

All of that is evidence. Facts are evidence.

Hentenza said:

The court that found him “guilty” was not a criminal court but a civil court.

Click to expand...

The court only found him guilty of lying when he said he didn't sexually assault the female in question. Then, after losing the trial, he slandered her yet again. So she sued him again, and won an even bigger judgement. He's not very bright, you know.

And there's no question about Trump creeping into a dressing room where young teens were naked. He bragged about getting away with it.

Would you like me to show you?

The Barbarian said:

Would you like me to show you?

Click to expand...

Evidence that he is guilty in the Epstein files.

The Barbarian said:

And there's no question about Trump creeping into a dressing room where young teens were naked. He bragged about getting away with it. Would you like me to show you?

Click to expand...

Hentenza said:

Evidence that he is guilty in the Epstein files.

Click to expand...

For that, we don't need the Epstein files. Here it is:
In an episode of the Howard Stern Show in April 2005, Mr Trump said: “Well I’ll tell you the funniest is that I’ll go backstage before a show and everyone’s getting dressed and ready, and everything else, and, you know, no men anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it, you know, I’m inspecting, I want to make sure everything is good.

“You know, the dresses. ‘Is everyone ok?’ You know they’re standing there with no clothes. ‘Is everybody okay?’ And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that”.

Trump quote on being backstage at pageants didn’t reference Miss Teen USA – Full Fact

Social media posts are sharing a quote attributed to President Trump about watching teenage girls dress, but this is not what he actually said.

fullfact.org

Most mental health people don't consider letching on young teens to be pedophilia; the term sometimes used is "hebephilia." As you probably know, young teens were the target group for Epstein and his friends.

The Barbarian said:

For that, we don't need the Epstein files. Here it is:
In an episode of the Howard Stern Show in April 2005, Mr Trump said: “Well I’ll tell you the funniest is that I’ll go backstage before a show and everyone’s getting dressed and ready, and everything else, and, you know, no men anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it, you know, I’m inspecting, I want to make sure everything is good.

“You know, the dresses. ‘Is everyone ok?’ You know they’re standing there with no clothes. ‘Is everybody okay?’ And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that”.

Trump quote on being backstage at pageants didn’t reference Miss Teen USA – Full Fact

Social media posts are sharing a quote attributed to President Trump about watching teenage girls dress, but this is not what he actually said.

fullfact.org

Most mental health people don't consider letching on young teens to be pedophilia; the term sometimes used is "hebephilia." As you probably know, young teens were the target group for Epstein and his friends.

Click to expand...

Howard Stern is your evidence? lol

Again, provide evidence from the Epstein files.

Hentenza said:

Probably but still no evidence regarding the Epstein files. Allegations are not evidence. Make an argument when you have evidence.

Click to expand...

Well, we have to wait until Trump releases them.

Hentenza said:

Howard Stern is your evidence? lol

Click to expand...

No, Trump's statement recorded on the Stern show are the evidence.

Hentenza said:

Again, provide evidence from the Epstein files.

Click to expand...

Before we can evaluate it, Trump has to release them as he promised.

For that, we don't need the Epstein files. Here it is:
In an episode of the Howard Stern Show in April 2005, Mr Trump said: “Well I’ll tell you the funniest is that I’ll go backstage before a show and everyone’s getting dressed and ready, and everything else, and, you know, no men anywhere, and I’m allowed to go in because I’m the owner of the pageant and therefore I’m inspecting it, you know, I’m inspecting, I want to make sure everything is good.

“You know, the dresses. ‘Is everyone ok?’ You know they’re standing there with no clothes. ‘Is everybody okay?’ And you see these incredible looking women. And so I sort of get away with things like that”.

Most mental health people don't consider letching on young teens to be pedophilia; the term sometimes used is "hebephilia." As you probably know, young teens were the target group for Epstein and others who molested them. In this case at least, they were for Trump, too.

Hentenza said:

Howard Stern is your evidence? lol

Click to expand...

Trump's comments on the Howard Stern show is the evidence. We don't need the Epstein files to know that he was creeping into the young girls' dressing room. He admitted it on the air.

The Barbarian said:

Trump's comments on the Howard Stern show is the evidence. We don't need the Epstein files to know that he was creeping into the young girls' dressing room. He admitted it on the air.

Click to expand...

Why would we suddenly believe that Trump wasn’t prevaricating and this “evidence” is the tru-tru?
Lockeroom talk! (on-the-airwaves)!

ozso said:

I just find it astounding is all.

Click to expand...

.

Sure. Imagination can create astounding images for anyone; a flying pig; a 6 pack of donuts that never runs out; a self tightening screw.....

But reality is a better place to exist.

ozso said:

Right all of the objecting and protesting over DC being cleaned up and made safer in this thread alone doesn't exist.

Click to expand...

I don’t have major problems with a city trying to get itself “clean”; I have concerns that the President of the United States has taken (yet) another role clearly meant for Congress, as his responsibility.

ozso said:

I mean outside of those derailing it with their Epstein obsession.

Click to expand...

Pass.

ozso said:

Removing homeless camps doesn't require an act of congress.

Click to expand...

It doesn’t require Presidential power-grabs either, but here we are.

The Barbarian said:

You seemed rather displeased that Trump was involved, but not so unhappy that democrats might also be. If you agree with me that we should see all the evidence and jail all the creeps who partied with Epstein and underage girls, then we're on the same page.

Click to expand...

No, I am displeased with the unfounded accusations that the reason hes not releasing the information is because he is a pedophile and the the information would show that. If people want demand thats its released, I'm fine with that. But to ASSUME the reason is because he's involved is or to accuse him of that is really horrible.

I have NO idea who was involved in messing around with under age girls. Republicans or Democrats or other world leaders and important figures. And neither do you. And in nearly 100% of your posts you NEVER indicated any assumption that anyone else was involved but Trump until I started asking why Biden didnt release it. In fact it is far more likely that Trump ISN'T involved because Biden did not release the information. I suppose it could be said that he didnt release it becauae he WAS involved. But I certainly dont recall you being so accusatory the last four years regarding Biden not releasing because hes involved.

Bottom line, I would like to know if we have any real evidence or not on who was involved with under age girls. I dont care who you are. Your life should be ruined over it.

However, there remains the possibility that there are national and world wide considerations at play. Things that could create National Security problems. So, while its possible that the government is protecting certain US politicians, it is also possible there is more at play here.

And I'm willing to acknowledge that instead of always falling on, "Trump.is just trying to protect himself cause hes a pedo."

We should see everyone involved in pedophilia in jail for the rest of their lives. But what kind of guarantee do you have that releasing what we have will prove that? Is riding on his jet or even visiting his Island enough to put people in prison? I would say no. We need much more than that. Even if Biden was involved. I dont want him in prison just cause he was in the jet or on the Island. Thats unjust.

And quite frankly with the possibility that there is much more at play here I'm not sure that we have a right to know.

I just got sucked back in. Bummer.

ozso said:

Oh noes he's reducing crime and blight in the nation's capitol. Let there be another mass tantrum, like there's been over a ballroom and a patio.

Click to expand...

Don’t worry, we’ll get back to talking about the Epstein files in two weeks when Congress gets back into town.

The Barbarian said:

Reminds me of Arlo Guthrie in the film "Alice's Restaurant."

Hardened criminals in cell: "Whatcha in for, kid?
"Littering."

The narrative would have been bettter if they could have some rocks thrown, or riots or something. All they had was an idiot throwing a sandwich at a trooper.

But you do what you can, with what you have, I suppose. Maybe it was a footlong. That could be aggravated food fighting, maybe.

Click to expand...

Well. I would agree rocks are more serious. Frozen water bottles would be bad too.

However nothing should be thrown at officers. Sandwich or not. And if you are an idiot throwing a sandwich at police then you are an idiot who can go to jail.

GoldenBoy89 said:

Biden never ran on or promised to release anything related to Epstein.

Click to expand...

Irrelevant. He had the files and no one on the left was asking or demanding their release.

GoldenBoy89 said:

That was Trump who made that a campaign promise. The official story from the government that he killed had himself in his cell was always good enough for most people on the left. We’re not the ones obsessed with finding pedophiles lurking in our government. Remember, Epstein mysteriously dying in his cell was the supposed “cover up from the deep state” that Trump was promising his base he would expose.

Click to expand...

When did he promise all that? I dont recall that. I remember someone asking him the question and said he would release the files as he had no problem with that.

GoldenBoy89 said:

This whole Epstein thing and the reason why the left is so adamant about pressing this button is because it is just about the clearest example of Trump LYING TO YOU, HIS SUPPORTERS

Click to expand...

You I, as a supporter, am willing to acknowledge that perhaps there is something bigger at play here. I certainly didn't vote for him because he said he would release the files. Thats was at the bottom of the list if on the list. That goes for the vast majority of his voters.

And as far as Im concerned there could be some serious government reasons for not releasing this stuff that Trump wasn't fully aware of. I DON'T KNOW.

You are pressing the button because you seem to hate him. And if you are like other posters here you think its because he's covering for himself.

The fact Biden did not release the information leads me to believe Trump isn't involved and there is something else going on. But just like everything else, you guys are hell bent on making it all about Trump covering for himself.

wing2000 said:

Yes, I saw his action. It wasn't wise to say the least. An Air Force Veteran and DOJ employee should know better. He was one man facing thirteen federal officers....on one street corner.

Click to expand...

wing2000 said:

But the theatre continued:
The DC prosecutor charges him with a felony stating no will touch the police (or something to the effect).

Click to expand...

Yeah he put on quite a show. Now he can do his little routine from behind bars.

Now hes a star in his own play. Good for him. No sympathy from me.

wing2000 said:

The judge rejected the charge as "excessive" over the weekend. The defended was released and ordered to appear in court at a later date....after the DOJ attornies were unable to argue he presented a threat to public safety...

Click to expand...

Well, the judge should have kept his mouth shut. He doesn't get to make that claim yet as there has been no trial. If he wants the release that guy until the next hearing, fine. But no commentary.