The Biblical Basis of 10 Catholic Distinctives

Berserk said:

True, there are exceptions to my generalizations. But I have served as a UMC pastor for several years and have served Bible studies and prayer groups. My remarks are based on those experiences. Though Pentecostal in spirituality, I have served as a Theology professor at a Franciscan university for several years. So I have been exposed to Catholic spirituality at its best.

If Christians obey the NT command to air their dirty linen to each other, then confidentiality of the listener is essential.
The Catholic requirement of confession to a priest is therefore a good safeguard against gossip, but I agree, not a divine requirement.

Click to expand...

I like the Anglican approach of combining optional auricular confession with a public confession, but I also like the approach of Eastern Orthodox Christians from Russia, Ukraine, Poland, Belarus, Georgia, Serbia, Romania and Bulgaria of mandatory auricular confession at least once a month, and preferably weekly, particularly since their priests seldom impose penances. In contrast the Greek Orthodox, Antiochian Orthodox, Cypriot Orthodox, Finnish Orthodox, Albanian Orthodox (I think) and also the North Macedonian Orthodox and Carpatho-Rusyn and the Czech and Slovak Orthodox Church practice confession at your discretion or annual confession. In some of these churches however, I have noticed laity are more likely to sit out the Eucharist.

St. John of Kronstadt had too many visitors to his parishes to hear their confessions in the normal way, so he implemented an unusual solution, which was to have everyone scream their transgressions as loudly as possible, so that no one could hear what anyone else had done over the din, and then he absolved all of them (individually i expect, by having them form a queue to venerate the Holy Cross and receive the prayer of absolution). However this is not done at present.

A ROCOR priest who didn’t speak English had myself and other parishioners who did not speak Russian just read a list of sins that covered everything. I like that, because if we look into Patristic hamartiology, a lot of us are guilty of sins we don’t realize we are guilty of. For example, many Early Church Fathers considered slander to be a form of murder. It is also possible to commit sexual immorality with one’s lawfully wedded spouse, by lusting after strange flesh. Thus the ancient Orthodox canon by which a confessor can deny the chalice to sodomites for up to twice the length of time as the adulterers can also be applied to married heterosexual couples.

OldAbramBrown said:

Relics have had no basis in spirituality for a very long time now.

Click to expand...

That might be true in those iconoclastic churches which destroyed all their relics, but for those of us who still have them, they are a very important part of our spirituality. Many, such as the relics of St. Nicholas of Myra, which were expropriated by the Latins and relocated to Bari, along with several other relics such as those of St. Mark which had been in the possession of the Orthodox, but which are now being returned (the Three Holy Hierarchs, for example, are once more in Constantinople), continue to stream myrhh, which the Orthodox have authenticated is the same myrhh that was streamed by these relics before the Roman Catholics of Bari removed them from the Orthodox church in Myra.

I myself venerate relics and receive myrhh streamed from them and from the Holy Icons known to gush myrhh (mostly icons of Our Glorious Lady Theotokos and Ever Virgin Mary) on every possible occasion.

Berserk said:

(8) THE BIBLICAL BASIS OF PURGATORY

The word "Purgatory" (Latin: "purgatorium") initially appears around 1160 AD), but this concept of postmortem purification has roots in ancient Judaism and the NT.

Click to expand...

roots?

There is nothing about Purgatory in either OT or NT.

And if we go outside the Bible --- Even 2 Macc does not mention it

Berserk said:

(1) Catholics refer to 2 Maccabees in their OT for the initial principle that justifies the concept of Purgatory. It was discovered that Jewish freedom fighters had committed idolatry and it was thought that their deaths in battle were a punishment for this sin. The righteous Jewish soldiers believed in praying for the dead. So they sent a sin offering to the Jerusalem Temple and prayed for these dead soldiers "that the sin that had been committed would be wholly blotted out. 12:42, 44)." In this way, they attest the belief that prayer and godly ritual can change the status of dead sinners in the eyes of God.

Click to expand...

Not in 2 Macc. Not in 2 Macc 12, Not in 2 Macc 12:42-44

First of all, paganism -- Idol worship of pagan gods is a mortal sin and even the Catholic Church confesses the Purgatory does not apply to the case of mortal sin.

2 Macc 12.
40 However, under the tunic of each of the dead, they found amulets that were sacred to the idols of Jamnia, which the law forbids the Jews to wear. Thus it was clear to everyone that this was the reason that these men had been slain. 41 And so they all praised the acts of the Lord, the just judge who reveals things that are hidden, 42 and they turned to supplication, praying that the sin that had been committed might be completely blotted out. The noble Judas exhorted the people to keep themselves free from sin, since they had seen with their own eyes what had happened as a result of the sin of those who had fallen.

43 Then he took up a collection from all of his soldiers, amounting to two thousand silver drachmas, and sent it to Jerusalem to provide for an expiatory sacrifice. In doing this, he acted in a suitable and honorable way, guided by his belief in the resurrection. 44 For if he had not expected those who had fallen to rise again, it would have been superfluous and foolish to pray for the dead

2 Macc admits that praying for the dead has no benefit apart from the future bodily resurrection.

That is the opposite teaching as compared to Purgatory where it is claimed that WHILE dead and BEFORE being bodily resurrected real BENEFIT is experienced by the dead in getting free from Purgatory.

So other than being a great example of "not purgatory" it simply reveals that someone took actions that were clearly not addressing the problem for as scripture says "it is appointed unto man once to die and then comes judgment" rather than "And then comes purgatory followed by heaven"

Berserk said:

Now modern Christians don't embrace the Apocrypha as Scripture

Click to expand...

agreed

Berserk said:

. But Paul applies this Maccabean principle to the Corinthian practice of proxy baptism for the unrighteous dead.

Click to expand...

Mormons do try to use the 1 Cor 15 text regarding baptism as if it were speaking of the living being baptized on behalf of an unsaved dead person.

Berserk said:

"...so that God may be all in all. Otherwise, what will they do who receive baptism in behalf of the dead? If the dead are not raised all all, why are they baptized on their behalf (1 Cor 15:28-29)?"

Click to expand...

More reliable to actually quote the entire sentence rather than the snip. Then we see that is not at all about getting an unsaved dead person to be saved.

Rather it is the more general point of the necessity of Christ being raised from the dead.

1 Cor 15

12 Now if Christ is preached, that He has been raised from the dead, how do some among you say that there is no resurrection of the dead? 13 But if there is no resurrection of the dead, then not even Christ has been raised; 14 and if Christ has not been raised, then our preaching is in vain, your faith also is in vain. 15 Moreover, we are even found to be false witnesses of God, because we testified against God that He raised Christ, whom He did not raise, if in fact the dead are not raised. 16 For if the dead are not raised, then not even Christ has been raised; 17 and if Christ has not been raised, your faith is worthless; you are still in your sins. 18 Then also those who have fallen asleep in Christ have perished. 19 If we have hoped in Christ only in this life, we are of all people most to be pitied.

20 But the fact is, Christ has been raised from the dead, the first fruits of those who are asleep. 21 For since by a man death came, by a Man also came the resurrection of the dead. 22 For as in Adam all die, so also in Christ all will be made alive. 23 But each in his own order: Christ the first fruits, after that those who are Christ’s at His coming, 24 then comes the end, when He hands over the kingdom to our God and Father, when He has abolished all rule and all authority and power. 25 For He must reign until He has put all His enemies under His feet. 26 The last enemy that will be abolished is death. 27 For He has put all things in subjection under His feet. But when He says, “All things are put in subjection,” it is clear that this excludes the Father who put all things in subjection to Him. 28 When all things are subjected to Him, then the Son Himself will also be subjected to the One who subjected all things to Him, so that God may be all in all.


29 For otherwise, what will those do who are baptized for the dead? If the dead are not raised at all, why then are they baptized for them? 30 Why are we also in danger every hour?


His comment is not about baptizing dead people it is rather it is of the form "what will those do who are baptized --- given the proposed idea that dead are not raised"? Which is a proposed scenario that he had been reviewing and debunking since vs 12

Berserk said:

(2) Paul accepts the traditional Jewish view that locates Paradise in the 3rd Heaven (2 Cor 12:2-3).

Click to expand...

true. Paradise is in the 3rd heaven according to 2 Cor 12 . Rev 2 says the Tree of life is presently in paradise and it is where the throne of God is in Rev 22.

Still true to this day.

Berserk said:

. Paradise is the desirable place for the deceased righteous to reside (see e. g. Luke 23:42-43).

Click to expand...

not true. In Luke 23 "remember me WHEN you come into your kingdom. And Christ answered "truly I say to you today you SHALL be with Me in Paradise" ... which is a reference in kind to that future day when Christ comes into His Kingdom.

So then in John 20 on resurrection Sunday Christ states "I have not yet ascended to My Father"

BobRyan said:

agreed

Click to expand...

You and @Berserk were both wrong, in that the three largest communities of Christians, and the sixth or seventh, to wit, Roman Catholics, Eastern Orthodox, Anglicans, and Oriental Orthodox, and also some Lutherans (Lutheran churches usually have an open canon), the fourth largest group, and some Reformed Catholics, accept the deuterocanonical books. Some accept even more. Unless you want to deny that we are “modern Christians” but that might cause our friends @Shane R @prodromos @Jipsah @jas3 @chevyontheriver @Michie and @Xeno.of.athens might disagree with that - we are traditional, not modernist (although many modernists also use the deuterocanon), but we are modern in that we are Christians alive today, in vibrant churches, which in the case of the Orthodox are experiencing explosive growth - parishes expanding at 18% per year both from converts and the high birth rate of the members, to the point a serious strain exists on our resources.

TLM and other traditional parishes of the RCC, that either use the Tridentine Mass or celebrate the Novus Ordo with equivalent reverence, Continuing Anglican parishes, Confessional Lutheran parishes like the LCMS, LCA, AALC, ELC and others, and traditional Episcopalian parishes in the southern US and traditional Anglo Catholic parishes in the Church of England such as St. Magnus the Martyr are also experiencing growth at the expense of broad church / liberal catholic parishes that don’t stand for anything, and aliturgical non-denominational churches (and some moderate evangelical Anglican parishes that try to emulate moderate non-denominational churches which used to generate growth but which now are increasingly unpopular due to being lukewarm).