essentialsaltes
Fact-Based Lifeform
- Oct 17, 2011
- 42,620
- 45,745
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Legal Union (Other)
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
HRC approved Julia’s idea about Trump and Russian hackers… That should distract people from her own missing emails.” (New York Post, 31 July 2025)
Well, isn't that a surprise? I can imagine Trump screaming at Durham: "Whose side are you on?"Durham’s Debunking of the ‘Clinton Plan’ Emails, Explained
Trump allies have fixated on a purported message about Hillary Clinton and Russia. John H. Durham, the special counsel, found evidence that it was likely a fake assembled by Russian spies.John Ratcliffe, a top intelligence official under Mr. Trump, declassified and made public that Russian intelligence analysis claimed Mrs. Clinton had “approved a campaign plan to stir up a scandal” against Mr. Trump by tying him to President Vladimir V. Putin and Russian hacking.In 2016, a Dutch spy agency hacked a Russian spy agency and copied internal memos and messages by Russian intelligence analysts. The Russians were writing reports about various topics based on the emails of American victims of Russian hacking operations. The Dutch shared a copy of the trove with the United States.The New Post as a paper isn't worth using it to line the bird cage. They know this information.
One does what one can with whatever one has, I suppose.NYTimes: ‘Clinton Plan’ Emails Were Likely Made by Russian Spies, Declassified Report Shows
An annex to a report by the special counsel John H. Durham was the latest in a series of disclosures about the Russia inquiry, as the Trump team seeks to distract from the Jeffrey Epstein files.The release of the annex adds new details to the public’s understanding of a complex trove of 2016 Russian intelligence reports analyzing purported emails that Russian hackers stole from Americans. It also shows how the special counsel, John H. Durham, went to great lengths to try to prove that several of the emails were real, only to ultimately conclude otherwise.Since the Durham report flopped so hard the first time, what makes MAGA think the same crap will succeed this time?
That's the thing. With Biden and Obama the Epstein thing, wasn't a thing. It has always been this crazy Qanon thing in which the GOP just rode that wave of crazy proclaiming Dem pedophiles; including of all people Bill Gates and Tom Hanks. "Pizza-gate" "They killed Epstein to keep him quiet". That group of pedophiles is being protected by the powerful. But it turns out those providing cover for both Epstein and Maxwell are GOP officials. Now they are being hoisted by their own petard.
That's the thing. With Biden and Obama the Epstein thing, wasn't a thing. It has always been this crazy Qanon thing in which the GOP just rode that wave of crazy proclaiming Dem pedophiles; including of all people Bill Gates and Tom Hanks. "Pizza-gate" "They killed Epstein to keep him quiet". That group of pedophiles is being protected by the powerful. But it turns out those providing cover for both Epstein and Maxwell are GOP officials. Now they are being hoisted by their own petard.
Except they were quoting the newly release declassified communications. Ooops!The New Post as a paper isn't worth using it to line the bird cage. They know this information.
That is not from an unknown source - it is a direct quote from communications declassified and released. I'd linked them a number of times - it's fact, not conjecture.HRC approved Julia’s idea about Trump and Russian hackers… That should distract people from her own missing emails.”
It's not what they are quoting.Except they were quoting the newly release declassified communications. Ooops!
That is not from an unknown source - it is a direct quote from communications declassified and released. I'd linked them a number of times - it's fact, not conjecture.
and here we are years later and the ACTUAL communications are declassified and released.It's not what they are quoting.
It's not what they are purposely not quoting.
Those emails are as the Dutch and Trump official John Radcliff noted; Russian fakes.
From the index of that report you mention regarding the "HRC: email:
“The office’s best assessment is that the July 25 and July 27 emails that purport to be from Benardo were ultimately a composite of several emails that were obtained through Russian intelligence hacking of the U.S.-based think tanks, including the Open Society Foundations, the Carnegie Endowment and others,” Mr. (Special Prosecutor John) Durham’s annex says.
See post #234Except they were quoting the newly release declassified communications. Ooops!
View attachment 368145
Holds a page that size up with his smallest fingers - worst photo shop ever.
View attachment 368146
How did they get two focus points on on sheet of paper.
My mistake - this is the worst photo shop ever -
The child who did these needs to be given lessons.
Not really. The Durham report with that index was publicly released years ago.and here we are years later and the ACTUAL communications are declassified and released.
It's like a game of whack-o-mo.See post #234
The Annex was the stuff that was too incredible (i.e. discredited) to put into the main report.
View attachment 368145
Holds a page that size up with his smallest fingers - worst photo shop ever.
View attachment 368146
How did they get two focus points on on sheet of paper.
My mistake - this is the worst photo shop ever -
The child who did these needs to be given lessons.
I do believe that the upcoming months will astonish us by what all will become public. It is time!and here we are years later and the ACTUAL communications are declassified and released.