FAITH-IN-HIM
Well-Known Member
Yeah, he has trade agreements with some countries but they say it is a bit different from what Trump says, and say that Trump is using "political rhetoric" that they differ on.
For instance:
The absence of a written agreement underpinning last week's talks could open the way for disputes, with some differences already emerging in the two sides' accounts of the deal.Key among these was Sunday's denial by a South Korean presidential adviser of U.S. claims that it would take 90% of the profit from project investments of $350 billion by South Korea, which also agreed to open up its domestic rice market."Even a binding deal like the FTA has been efficiently scrapped," warned Choi Seok-young, a former chief negotiator for the Korea-U.S. free trade deal, signed in 2007. "And this is just promise."
The agreement with South Korea is not written yet....and South Korea differs on the details from Trump.
The deal with Vietnam is also not a written agreement as details need to be finalized.
And neither of these show the US winning over China in terms of world trade and influence.
The ending of USAID took away US influence. The ending Voice of America is lowering US influence, and China is stepping up.
I searched online to find out which trade deals were signed by the President, but found no clear answers. Right-wing media praise Trump for making these deals, while left-wing outlets criticize them, yet none mention that these agreements require congressional approval and that the President has limited authority to unilaterally sign binding trade agreements.
This is our current situation. Public understanding of the basic congressional authority required for binding trade agreements is non-existence or discussed by major media outlets. It appears that many journalists may not research these matters thoroughly, often focusing on either praising or criticizing presidential actions. Likewise, many citizens are either unaware of or indifferent to the legal process. Some strongly support the President regardless of whether agreements receive congressional approval, while others are primarily engaged in offering criticism.
Upvote
0