• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Ocasio-Cortez under investigation by House Ethics Committee

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,057
16,961
Here
✟1,458,686.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is under investigation by the House Ethics Committee, the panel’s acting chair and ranking member said in a statement on Wednesday.

The committee did not specify what exactly it was probing regarding the congresswoman and noted that its statement “does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred.”

The House Ethics panel received the matter from the nonpartisan Office of Congressional Ethics in June and said it plans to “announce its course of action” in the next Congress.

The House Ethics Committee typically has 45 days to review a matter referred to it by the Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent entity that initially examines allegations of misconduct against lawmakers and other House employees.

At the end of the 45 day-period, the committee can choose to extend its consideration of an issue but must make a public statement, as it did in Ocasio-Cortez’s case.



Not much details yet...but it'll be interesting to see what the "matter" was that spawned this whole thing.
 

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
22,387
13,840
Earth
✟240,907.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat

Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) is under investigation by the House Ethics Committee, the panel’s acting chair and ranking member said in a statement on Wednesday.

The committee did not specify what exactly it was probing regarding the congresswoman and noted that its statement “does not itself indicate that any violation has occurred.”

The House Ethics panel received the matter from the nonpartisan Office of Congressional Ethics in June and said it plans to “announce its course of action” in the next Congress.

The House Ethics Committee typically has 45 days to review a matter referred to it by the Office of Congressional Ethics, an independent entity that initially examines allegations of misconduct against lawmakers and other House employees.

At the end of the 45 day-period, the committee can choose to extend its consideration of an issue but must make a public statement, as it did in Ocasio-Cortez’s case.



Not much details yet...but it'll be interesting to see what the "matter" was that spawned this whole thing.
My guess the “Tax the Rich dress” that she “borrowed”.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,057
16,961
Here
✟1,458,686.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
My guess the “Tax the Rich dress” that she “borrowed”.
That was from the Met Gala in September 2021 correct? I do remember some backlash for her attendance at that event.

It's possible that the ethics complaint was submitted on a delay, but per the Hill article
The House Ethics panel received the matter from the nonpartisan Office of Congressional Ethics in June

That would be a heck of a long time to wait (~9 months) to file a complaint of that nature...but I guess it's possible that the gears of bureaucracy really do move that slow.

Part of me thinks this is unrelated to that particular matter, but you could be correct.
 
Upvote 0

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
3,101
2,672
27
Seattle
✟162,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
It's in reference to a Met Gala event entry:
According to the New York Times, designers and corporate sponsors generally pay Met Gala admission — $35,000 a ticket or $200,000 to $300,000 a table — for the gala’s guests.

"Many New York City elected officials are invited as well, as ‘guests of the museum’ who do not pay," the Times said.

HERE
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,057
16,961
Here
✟1,458,686.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
It's in reference to a Met Gala event entry:
If it is the same event in question that sparked this, it's odd that they would've waited until June 2022 to file a complaint about something that occurred in September of 2021.

But it could be that government just does move that slow
 
Upvote 0

Say it aint so

Well-Known Member
Jun 19, 2020
3,101
2,672
27
Seattle
✟162,705.00
Country
United States
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
Single
If it is the same event in question that sparked this, it's odd that they would've waited until June 2022 to file a complaint about something that occurred in September of 2021.

But it could be that government just does move that slow
""In September 2021, a conservative watchdog filed a complaint with the Office of Congressional Ethics after Ocasio-Cortez attended the Met Gala, suggesting that her presence may have been the result of an impermissible gift. A spokesperson for the congresswoman did not respond to an email asking if the investigation involved Ocasio-Cortez’s appearance at the gala""

FORBES
 
Upvote 0

essentialsaltes

Fact-Based Lifeform
Oct 17, 2011
41,936
45,049
Los Angeles Area
✟1,003,426.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Legal Union (Other)

Our long national nightmare is over!​

AOC's on the hook for $2,983.28 after the House Ethics panel closed its probe into her Met Gala appearance


In a 31-page report, the panel said that Ocasio-Cortez had "impermissibly accepted gifts" and said that in order for the matter to be closed, she would need to pay nearly $3,000 in personal funds.

That includes $250 to cover the attendance of her fiancé, Riley Roberts, and an additional [emphasis added] $2,733.28 payment to Brother Vellies, the business that designed her dress.

Her chief of staff, Mike Casca, told BI in a statement that she would make those payments.

The committee said that Ocasio-Cortez had taken proactive steps to comply with House Ethics rules

The report said that the congresswoman's attempts to comply with the gift rules included arranging to rent the dress and accessories that she was provided with and to pay for other services out of pocket, which are usually provided to Met Gala guests for free.

However, the committee said that her fiancé's attendance was an impermissible gift because he is not yet her spouse, and that she initially failed to pay the full fair market value for some of the items she wore.
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,481
29,171
Baltimore
✟756,363.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat

Our long national nightmare is over!​

AOC's on the hook for $2,983.28 after the House Ethics panel closed its probe into her Met Gala appearance


In a 31-page report, the panel said that Ocasio-Cortez had "impermissibly accepted gifts" and said that in order for the matter to be closed, she would need to pay nearly $3,000 in personal funds.

That includes $250 to cover the attendance of her fiancé, Riley Roberts, and an additional [emphasis added] $2,733.28 payment to Brother Vellies, the business that designed her dress.

Her chief of staff, Mike Casca, told BI in a statement that she would make those payments.

The committee said that Ocasio-Cortez had taken proactive steps to comply with House Ethics rules

The report said that the congresswoman's attempts to comply with the gift rules included arranging to rent the dress and accessories that she was provided with and to pay for other services out of pocket, which are usually provided to Met Gala guests for free.

However, the committee said that her fiancé's attendance was an impermissible gift because he is not yet her spouse, and that she initially failed to pay the full fair market value for some of the items she wore.
They should’ve gifted her a 747 instead.
 
Upvote 0