• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Does the "reign in the influence of Israel" movement need a Tucker Carlson to be credible?

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,076
9,798
PA
✟428,007.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,076
9,798
PA
✟428,007.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
It appears that you are unable to provide scriptural evidence supporting the claim that modern-day Israel differs from what is described in the Bible. Thank you for sharing your perspective; however, I do not find it compelling. As I mentioned, I am willing to reconsider my position if you can present relevant scripture.
As I said, I can't prove to you a negative, so why even bother? Perhaps if you shared the scriptural basis for your belief, we could discuss why you are incorrect, but that would be straying off-topic for this particular section of the forums.
Based on our discussion thus far, it seems you have not provided any. I will continue to place greater trust in the word of God than in human opinions.
The problem with this point of view is that you are placing your trust in human opinions. They're just different opinions.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2024
1,865
1,248
WI
✟51,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
That took longer than I expected.
I agree . I could have ended the discussion with my initial post, but I chose instead to address what I perceived as hypocrisy on the left .
 
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,076
9,798
PA
✟428,007.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,485
16,230
55
USA
✟408,424.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'd be careful using that argument, I suspect some people will pounce on that...
Looks like only you are pouncing so far.
The acknowledgement of "The young libs only come out to protest when Western powers support those forces" is proving half of their point for them.
:rolleyes: The comment was very clearly about leverage that protests in the US have. We could organize a mass movement about the war in Sudan (the war that was mentioned), but who would you protest and what effect could it have?

Back in my day, the "Free Tibet" movement was a big thing on campus. Why did college students think they had any kind of leverage over China in their treatment of Tibet? Because the US government was engaging with China and the potential for full trade relations. Protesters could hope to influence the US government to engage with China in ways that reflected concerns about treatment of Tibet.
That's basically an acknowledgment that it's more of an "Anti-West" sentiment driving this than a "sincere concern for Palestinians" sentiment.


Basically "We'll ignore it or take a non-interventionist approach... unless a "colonialist" government supports it, in that case, we'll come out in droves to protest" isn't exactly conveying a great message.


To be fair, this isn't a new pattern...several other international conflicts have followed the "meh...... unless there some sort of narrative it serves, in that case then we have a serious opinion about it" pattern
Are you being fair? I'm not sure. You've constructed a narrative of who "foreign policy protestors" are (anti-Western, anti-colonial leftists) and then project it upon (nearly) all who oppose Israel in Palestine.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: RocksInMyHead
Upvote 0

Desk trauma

The pickles are up to something
Site Supporter
Dec 1, 2011
22,243
18,199
✟1,412,739.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I agree . I could have ended the discussion with my initial post, but I chose instead to address what I perceived as hypocrisy on the left .
Yes. You could have saved all our time by opening with the anti semitism card.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
27,934
16,886
Here
✟1,450,877.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Are you being fair? I'm not sure. You've constructed a narrative of who "foreign policy protestors" are (anti-Western, anti-colonial leftists) and then project it upon (nearly) all who oppose Israel in Palestine.
I'm speaking specifically about the "grab your signs and hit the streets" protesting. That's almost always only done when there's a perceived connection between one of the belligerents and a "Western power" in order to conform to a broader narrative.


I can enumerate several instances where people didn't seem to care about a particular foreign conflict, but it was only when a "western power" became involved when people wanted to hit the streets with their peace signs and seemingly take whatever side was opposite of the western power.


Iraq spent 3 decades going to battle with various neighbors
Iran did the same

Not much chatter on the streets, it wasn't until there was an opportunity (like Operation Dessert Storm) that people wanted to hit the streets and advocate for "peace in the middle east"


Vietnam was similar...

I don't recall seeing many protests or calls for peace when they were being occupied by (or in conflict with) Japan or Cambodia 10 years prior, but the moment the US got involved, suddenly a bunch of N. Vietnamese sympathizers in the US came out of the woodwork.


Kosovo and Libya followed that pattern as well.



A few sociologists and poli-sci authors have written about it.

Neta Crawford wrote how Western anti-imperialist and leftist movements often respond not to the crisis itself, but to the symbolism of U.S. or NATO involvement.

Jean Bricmont has written about how parts of the left reflexively oppose interventions not based on the actual nature of local crisis but because they see it as an opportunity to critique imperialism. He discusses how conflicts get ignored until the West intervenes — then become flashpoints for protest.

Christian Caryl has written several pieces about this phenomenon, specifically with regards to the Syrian conflict.



Hence the theme of my thread, does the "Reign in the influence of Israel" movement/narrative need some folks (like Tucker) who specifically aren't in that "reflexively oppose all things Western" crowd in order to make certain specifics of this conflict resonate with more people?
 
  • Like
Reactions: rjs330
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2024
1,865
1,248
WI
✟51,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
As I said, I can't prove to you a negative, so why even bother? Perhaps if you shared the scriptural basis for your belief, we could discuss why you are incorrect, but that would be straying off-topic for this particular section of the forums.

The problem with this point of view is that you are placing your trust in human opinions. They're just different opinions.
You previously mentioned that modern-day Israel may not be the same as the Israel referenced in the Bible. Are you now changing your position on this statement?
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,314
4,165
82
Goldsboro NC
✟256,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
You previously mentioned that modern-day Israel may not be the same as the Israel referenced in the Bible. Are you now changing your position on this statement?
No, he is just suggesting that there may be scriptural reasons for supposing it is not.
 
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,076
9,798
PA
✟428,007.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
You previously mentioned that modern-day Israel may not be the same as the Israel referenced in the Bible. Are you now changing your position on this statement?
I'm not sure how you could possibly get that impression from what I said.
 
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2024
1,865
1,248
WI
✟51,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm not sure how you could possibly get that impression from what I said.

Thank you for clarifying your position. I apologize for any misunderstanding on my part.

To return to my original point, whether it was four thousand years ago, two thousand years ago, or today, the nation of Israel and the Jewish people are regarded as God’s chosen people. Although they have disobeyed God on numerous occasions and faced consequences over the millennia, the Bible consistently affirms that the Jewish people and Israel are chosen by God. According to scripture, they will be protected, preserved, and ultimately offered the salvation that God extends to all.

Do you agree or disagree with these biblical principles?
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,314
4,165
82
Goldsboro NC
✟256,906.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
I'm speaking specifically about the "grab your signs and hit the streets" protesting. That's almost always only done when there's a perceived connection between one of the belligerents and a "Western power" in order to conform to a broader narrative.


I can enumerate several instances where people didn't seem to care about a particular foreign conflict, but it was only when a "western power" became involved when people wanted to hit the streets with their peace signs and seemingly take whatever side was opposite of the western power.


Iraq spent 3 decades going to battle with various neighbors
Iran did the same

Not much chatter on the streets, it wasn't until there was an opportunity (like Operation Dessert Storm) that people wanted to hit the streets and advocate for "peace in the middle east"


Vietnam was similar...

I don't recall seeing many protests or calls for peace when they were being occupied by (or in conflict with) Japan or Cambodia 10 years prior, but the moment the US got involved, suddenly a bunch of N. Vietnamese sympathizers in the US came out of the woodwork.


Kosovo and Libya followed that pattern as well.



A few sociologists and poli-sci authors have written about it.

Neta Crawford wrote how Western anti-imperialist and leftist movements often respond not to the crisis itself, but to the symbolism of U.S. or NATO involvement.

Jean Bricmont has written about how parts of the left reflexively oppose interventions not based on the actual nature of local crisis but because they see it as an opportunity to critique imperialism. He discusses how conflicts get ignored until the West intervenes — then become flashpoints for protest.

Christian Caryl has written several pieces about this phenomenon, specifically with regards to the Syrian conflict.



Hence the theme of my thread, does the "Reign in the influence of Israel" movement/narrative need some folks (like Tucker) who specifically aren't in that "reflexively oppose all things Western" crowd in order to make certain specifics of this conflict resonate with more people?
I don't know how old you are or why you hate what you think of as "The Left" so much but I am old enough to have been aware of many of the events you refer to and sometimes to the extent of actually protesting myself. I can state with confidence based on my own experience that your characterization of "The Left" is rapidly decaying into 100% pure weapons grade bolognium.
 
Upvote 0

RocksInMyHead

God is innocent; Noah built on a floodplain!
May 12, 2011
9,076
9,798
PA
✟428,007.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
To return to my original point, whether it was four thousand years ago, two thousand years ago, or today, the nation of Israel and the Jewish people are regarded as God’s chosen people. Although they have disobeyed God on numerous occasions and faced consequences over the millennia, the Bible consistently affirms that the Jewish people and Israel are chosen by God. According to scripture, they will be protected, preserved, and ultimately offered the salvation that God extends to all.

Do you agree or disagree with these biblical principles?
As I said, any further discussion of the theological aspects of dispensationalism would be off-topic for this forum.
No General Apologetics Topics

Apologetics is a branch of theology that concerns itself with defending or proving the truths of the Christian faith and doctrines. Discussion and debate on subjects related to general apologetics are not allowed in the Discussion and Debate category forums. Christians who would like to discuss apologetics may do so in the Christian Apologetics forum.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,485
16,230
55
USA
✟408,424.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I'm speaking specifically about the "grab your signs and hit the streets" protesting. That's almost always only done when there's a perceived connection between one of the belligerents and a "Western power" in order to conform to a broader narrative.
I went back and looked at your OP, you mention Tucker Carlson as a potential "ally" to this movement. Tucker isn't grabbing any signs to protest in the street. To the extent that some active protestors (but not all) share your need for narrative, it is not every on the street (and never was) and even less so among those who consider themselves politically active on the topic of Israel-Palestine. I don't know why you can't meet your fellow posters concerned about Palestine where we actually are, rather than projecting other opinions onto them.
I can enumerate several instances where people didn't seem to care about a particular foreign conflict, but it was only when a "western power" became involved when people wanted to hit the streets with their peace signs and seemingly take whatever side was opposite of the western power.
I don't know how to break this to you, Rob... Americans (and we are talking about American protestors) are much more interested in thing that involve us than things that don't. That pattern applies to all of your examples.
Iraq spent 3 decades going to battle with various neighbors
Iran did the same

Not much chatter on the streets, it wasn't until there was an opportunity (like Operation Dessert Storm) that people wanted to hit the streets and advocate for "peace in the middle east"
This one I remember *real* clearly as when it was occurring I lived with ~50 other American men who had freshly signed Selective Service cards. We'd never seen anything like this in our own memory (we were too young to remember Vietnam). Our cohorts (friends, neighbors, brothers and cousins) who were in the National Guard were activated and deployed to a potential invasion. The slogans weren't about "peace in the middle east", but "No Blood for Oil" (that is *our* blood).
Vietnam was similar...

I don't recall seeing many protests or calls for peace when they were being occupied by (or in conflict with) Japan or Cambodia 10 years prior, but the moment the US got involved, suddenly a bunch of N. Vietnamese sympathizers in the US came out of the woodwork.
This one *is* before my time, but I did learn about it in school. (didn't you?) Opposition to the war was driven by not wanting to *fight* for in another pointless "domino" war (just a decade after the last one). It was about opposition to the draft at its core, just like the anti-draft riots of 1863. For the tiny number of actual communists in the US, yes, N. Vietnam became the "cause celebre", but again, so what.
Kosovo and Libya followed that pattern as well.



A few sociologists and poli-sci authors have written about it.

Neta Crawford wrote how Western anti-imperialist and leftist movements often respond not to the crisis itself, but to the symbolism of U.S. or NATO involvement.

Jean Bricmont has written about how parts of the left reflexively oppose interventions not based on the actual nature of local crisis but because they see it as an opportunity to critique imperialism. He discusses how conflicts get ignored until the West intervenes — then become flashpoints for protest.

Christian Caryl has written several pieces about this phenomenon, specifically with regards to the Syrian conflict.
I don't know why you are talking about "leftists" at all. The opposition to Palestinian occupation is far broader than the narrow group of self-identified "leftists" in the US. Can this be anything other than a distraction.
Hence the theme of my thread, does the "Reign in the influence of Israel" movement/narrative need some folks (like Tucker) who specifically aren't in that "reflexively oppose all things Western" crowd in order to make certain specifics of this conflict resonate with more people?
Personally, I can't stand any of the narrative approaches to real problems. Not the "everything is western imperialism" narrative, not your "the 'everything is western imperialism' narrative is bad narrative", nor any of the narratives being directly pushed by Arab nationalists, Christian Zionists, etc.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,485
16,230
55
USA
✟408,424.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Yes, I have considered this on several occasions. If you believe that the modern state of Israel is not the "Israel" referenced in the Bible, please provide scriptural evidence. I am certainly open to reconsidering my position.

Given that there are no texts newer than about 1800 years old in the New Testament (the scripture I assume you reference rather than newer ones like the "Quran" or the "Book of Mormon" or the "Urantia Book") and for the vast majority of that period (the first 95% of it or so) there was no state called "Israel" nor was there even one when the books of the New Testament were written in the first place, it isn't relevant.

Modern Israel has different borders than the earlier Israel, it has a different form of government (parliamentary democracy) than earlier Israel, and it has different people than earlier Israel. It is a recreated state with a recreated language by people who were largely scattered throughout the planet for centuries whose culture and religion had evolved since the diaspora.
 
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2024
1,865
1,248
WI
✟51,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Given that there are no texts newer than about 1800 years old in the New Testament (the scripture I assume you reference rather than newer ones like the "Quran" or the "Book of Mormon" or the "Urantia Book") and for the vast majority of that period (the first 95% of it or so) there was no state called "Israel" nor was there even one when the books of the New Testament were written in the first place, it isn't relevant.

Modern Israel has different borders than the earlier Israel, it has a different form of government (parliamentary democracy) than earlier Israel, and it has different people than earlier Israel. It is a recreated state with a recreated language by people who were largely scattered throughout the planet for centuries whose culture and religion had evolved since the diaspora.

I noticed your religious affiliation is listed as atheist. Engaging in discussions of biblical texts with individuals who do not believe in God is unlikely to yield productive outcomes.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

Hood was a loser.
Mar 11, 2017
21,485
16,230
55
USA
✟408,424.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I noticed your religious affiliation is listed as atheist. Engaging in discussions of biblical texts with individuals who do not believe in God is unlikely to yield productive outcomes.
I find the same with people who take ancient texts to be true or profound.

Though you fail to get my point. Your text (the NT) was not written or read in the time of any historical state of Israel. The Israel of today is a modern invention.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0

FAITH-IN-HIM

Well-Known Member
Aug 23, 2024
1,865
1,248
WI
✟51,058.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I find the same with people who take ancient texts to be true or profound.

Though you fail to get my point. Your text (the NT) was not written or read in the time of any historical state of Israel. The Israel of today is a modern invention.
If you don't believe Jesus' statement—"Heaven and earth will pass away, but my words will never pass away"—is as true now as it was 2,000 years ago, we won't agree on Biblical texts.
 
Upvote 0