• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Truth Cannot Contradict Truth: The Scopes Trial 100 Years Later

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
181,922
65,798
Woods
✟5,841,392.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
What was true 100 years ago is true today.


Historical sign in Dayton, Tenn., marking the Scopes Trial.
Historical sign in Dayton, Tenn., marking the Scopes Trial. (photo: Jerome L. Lawson / Shutterstock)

“When I see your heavens, the work of your fingers, / the moon and stars that you set in place — / What is man that you are mindful of him, / and a son of man that you care for him?/ Yet you have made him little less than a god, / crowned him with glory and honor.” — Psalm 8:4-5
Perhaps one of the most famous trials in the history of the United States began on July 10, 1925, in Dayton, Tennessee.

Officially, the case was Tennessee v. John Thomas Scopes, a high-school biology teacher. Most people refer to it as the “Scopes Trial” or the “Scopes Monkey Trial” because Scopes was accused of violating the Butler Act, which made it illegal, in Tennessee, to “teach any theory that denies the story of the Divine Creation of man as taught in the Bible, and to teach instead that man has descended from a lower order of animals.”

Aided by the American Civil Liberties Union, Scopes was represented by the famous attorney Clarence Darrow, and the state was assisted by the former three-time Democratic nominee for president William Jennings Bryan. The trial was depicted then (and now) as a classic case of science and reason versus faith and superstition. This depiction is usually followed by an assertion that “science won” the trial and the argument.

Continued below.