- Dec 1, 2011
- 22,231
- 18,181
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- Private
- Politics
- US-Others
We have always at war with east Asia.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The question is whether she was lying then, or lying now.In February Pam Bondi said there was a Epstein client list on her desk. And now she's obviously lying about it.
Once you're rich and powerful enough, you can do what you want. Until you stop playing ball, then you have the sword of blackmail hanging over your head.Look we all know what went on. Its now obvious no one is going to tell us who. Quite frankly I'm disgusted that no DOJ is going to give us the information.
The truth is they dont have to. And even if they did give us names it wouldn't prove whomever was on the list did anything.
This whole sorted affair is sick. The rich and influential shall be protected from suspicion at all costs. Thats the message. From Bidens and Trumps DOJ. I'm disgusted.
The question is whether she was lying then, or lying now.
Overall, the message from the US government across multiple administrations has been consistent that there are no more prosecutions to follow and by inference or statement, no client list.
In answer to a direct question about whether the DOJ was "releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients," she said it was right before her sitting on her desk and it was being reviewed for release at the directive of the President.She had the report, which was a stack of papers, on her desk - she admitted to that.
yah the whole thing was a hoax to distract from something else. /sI'm so happy for our conservative friends that they now can celebrate that a bunch of children were pimped out to nobody in particular.
well, maybe she isn't lying because she didn't read the papers, which turned out to be blankShe had the report, which was a stack of papers, on her desk - she admitted to that. She wasn't "lying" about anything, she was being honest. She was also honest when she admitted she hadn't seen anything new yet at the time.
In answer to a direct question about whether the DOJ was "releasing the list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients," she said it was right before her sitting on her desk and it was being reviewed for release at the directive of the President.
"list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients"It's not a "lie" to mistakenly call the stack of papers a "list". A list is very similar to a stack of papers. There may very well have even been "lists" within that stack... other kinds of lists.
"list of Jeffrey Epstein's clients"
What piffle you're propagating.
LOL. Look at the mistake you just made! Will you admit to your mistake?What piffle you're prpropagating.
The antecedent to "it" is "the list of Jeffrey Epstein clients", the solitary object of the verb 'release' in the question.She never said she had the list of "Jeffrey Epstein clients".
That's your own assumption. It's not a "fact"The antecedent to "it" is "the list of Jeffrey Epstein clients", the solitary object of the verb 'release' in the question.
It is a fact.That's your own assumption. It's not a "fact"
It's not a fact that her statement was a direct response to a "list" when her own words were "files". She said "files" 3 times...It is a fact.
He askes about the "list".It's not a fact that her statement was a direct response to a "list" when her own words were "files". She said "files" 3 times...
Wake up people!!!
Oh, I'm sorry. By 'it' I meant "the moon is the Earth's largest satellite." Not the thing you were just talking about that I responded to.It's not a fact that her statement was a direct response to a "list" when her own words were "files". She said "files" 3 times...
Do politicians always answer reporters questions directly or do they sometimes give indirect answers?He askes about the "list".
She directly responds that its on her desk.
Then she goes on to talk about other "files"
Its all there in about 10 sec of video.