• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Exploring the Relationship Between Adam's Initial Immortality and the Age of the Earth

Semper-Fi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2019
2,001
861
Pacific north west
✟563,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Michael Heiser understands that Genesis describes an ancient Israelite cosmology, not modern science. He takes the Bible literally, but he also doesn't confuse it with modern science and biology.
You need to learn what the word cosmology means. [Example] When the bible says He God
stretched out the heavens], and you claim it is cosmology, that is deception and a lie. No bible
wrighter ever used [science to discovered the heavens stretching-out]. God said it period.

P.S. Michael Heiser work focused on the nature of the spiritual realm in
the Bible and about spiritual matters more generally then literally.
-

cos·mol·o·gy
[käzˈmäləjē]
noun
the [science of] the origin and development of the universe....

Can you name any of the biblical wrighters that where scientists?
 
Last edited:
  • Prayers
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

Semper-Fi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2019
2,001
861
Pacific north west
✟563,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Given the huge amount of neanderthal bones found in Israel it really makes me wonder if the giants of old.. are neanderthals and densovans.
I like the way God defines species.

"And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle
after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.

Species I think should be if they can reproduce "after their kind".
Science found Humans and Neanderthals can breed together.

N.H.M. has Neanderthal name meaning "human from the Neander Vally"

Genesis 6:4 talks about “giants” in the land before the flood.

Gen 6:4 There were giantsH5303

H5303
נְפִל נְפִיל
nephı̂yl nephil
nef-eel', nef-eel'
From H5307; properly, a feller, that is, a bully
or tyrant: - giant. Total KJV occurrences: 3

Giants is translated from two original Hebrew words:
Rephaim and Nephilim. Nephilim, which means “a feller,”
or one who fells a tree because of his unusual strength.

The term implies a “tough,” or a bully, an individual of
great physical might. The pre-Flood Nephilim were giants
in strength but not in tallness of stature.

The description of the Nephilim of pre-Flood matches with
the large-boned, exceptionally muscled Neanderthals.

Neanderthals and humans interbred and produced offspring that
interbred—and regularly. Promiscuous early humans interbred
'multiple times' in 'world of debauchery'

The Rephaim are mentioned only after the Flood; they
were tall men, like Anakim (Deuteronomy 2:11, 20).

Deu 2:11 Which also were accounted giants,H7497
as the Anakims;H6062

H7497
רָפָה רָפָא
râphâ' râphâh
raw-faw', raw-faw'
From H7495 in the sense of invigorating; a giant: - giant,
Rapha, Rephaim (-s). See also H1051. Total KJV occurrences: 21

H6062
עֲנָקִי
‛ănâqı̂y
an-aw-kee'
Patronymic from H6061; an Anakite or descendant of Anak:
- Anakim. Total KJV occurrences: 9
-

The Bible talks about a great leader named Tubalcain. He was
the first to work with metal and develop instruments of war (Genesis 4:22).
And in those days violence filled the Earth (Genesis 6:11, 13).

The Neanderthals were no match for the swords, spears and
arrows of Tubalcain’s armies. eventually the violence and
degradation became so intense that God decided to destroy
all humans except Noah and others, in a worldwide Flood.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

johansen

Well-Known Member
Sep 13, 2023
591
145
36
silverdale
✟51,279.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
And God made the beast of the earth after his kind, and cattle
after their kind, and every thing that creepeth upon the earth
after his kind: and God saw that it was good.
Densovans and neanderthals are our species, we have mixed many times in the last 150k years. We might even find enough dna in my lifetime to make one of them again.

And in the event we do, you would never notice the difference except that its possible none of them would ever be born again, and once again: God's people will be regarded as conspiracy theorists by the rest of the spiritually dead mankind.

Secondly, the whole point of genesis is a cultural narrative to counter the Babylonian narrative they were being fed in captivity, which you can read about elsewhere if you want to.
 
Upvote 0

Semper-Fi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2019
2,001
861
Pacific north west
✟563,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Geneologies in the ancient world are not like geneologies of 21st century DNA tests.

"Scientists use the differences—mutations—in a woman’s mtdna to calculate how
long ago their most recent common ancestor must have lived. They prove that every
human being has descended from one, sole female ancestor. All living can trace their
lineage, in a direct line, to this female. mitochondrial Eve is actually far younger than
commonly thought.

" The most recent estimate of the mutation rate in human mitochondria is about 0.5
per generation. Thus, even for the most mutated sequences, it would only require
200 generations (less than 6,000 years) to accumulate 100 mutations.

This calculation is based upon the most straightforward application of the molecular
clock concept. If mutation rates were even faster in the past, it would require even less
time to accumulate 100 mutational differences.

But the actual mean is just 22 differences—reducing the required time fourfold"
If we abide by a reasonable mutational clock, our mitochondrial Eve easily dates
back within 6,000 years—the exact biblical time frame for mother Eve.

mtdna merely points to the most recent common female ancestor, and it could
potentially have been one of Eve’s daughters or later female descendants.

The main point is that this single common female ancestor fits squarely within
the biblical time frame for Adam and Eve, corroborating the biblical account.

Our nearest common Y-chromosome Adam lived long after mitochondrial Eve.
Geneticist Prof. Steve Jones writes in his book In the Blood: God, Genes and Destiny:

"The Y chromosomes of the world are remarkably similar, with only about one
hundredth as much variation as on the other chromosomes. Mitochondria, in contrast,
are quite variable. This lack of diversity among male lineages suggests that their
common ancestor lived so recently that there has not been time for his descendants’
Y chromosomes to accumulate differences. "

From a biblical perspective, Jones is absolutely right—because Y-chromosome Adam
would have been, in fact, Noah! The closest human common Y-chromosomal ancestor, Noah.

"Today, the Y chromosomes of modern men are only about 300 mutations removed from
Y-Chromosome Adam … if we assume a normal mutation rate for the Y chromosome
(about 1 mutation per chromosome per generation), we would only need 300 generations
(about 6,000 years) to get 300 mutations. This is the most straightforward application of
the molecular clock concept. "

The numbers are in perfect agreement with the biblical perspective......notes from
-
Even in the Bible, you have geneologies that are leaving people out. Some contradict one another. Mathew organizes his geneologies, omitting certain people, so that they match in number 14s as well.
There is a significant amount of debate about these antediluvian-
and patriarchal-period numbers, resulting in wildly different counts
—to the tune of nearly 1,500 years. How long ago Adam the person live?
-

In the ancient world, geneologies, including figures of the Sumerian and Assyrian kings lists, include legendary heroes that were theologically important, but not necessarily biologically ancestral.
Ah the Sumerians Ancient Kings List -verses-Biblical Longevity Impossibilty.
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,356
3,178
Hartford, Connecticut
✟354,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
"Scientists use the differences—mutations—in a woman’s mtdna to calculate how
long ago their most recent common ancestor must have lived. They prove that every
human being has descended from one, sole female ancestor. All living can trace their
lineage, in a direct line, to this female. mitochondrial Eve is actually far younger than
commonly thought.
And yet every biologist on planet earth has mysteriously missed that all people originated from one woman? Oh that's right:

From wiki on mitochondrial Eve:
"In terms of mitochondrial haplogroups, the mt-MRCA is situated at the divergence of macro-haplogroup L into L0 and L1–6. As of 2013, estimates on the age of this split ranged at around 155,000 years ago,[note 3] consistent with a date later than the speciation of Homo sapiens but earlier than the recent out-of-Africa dispersal.[4][1][5]

The male analog to the "Mitochondrial Eve" is the "Y-chromosomal Adam" (or Y-MRCA), the individual from whom all living humans are patrilineally descended. As the identity of both matrilineal and patrilineal MRCAs is dependent on genealogical history (pedigree collapse), they need not have lived at the same time. As of 2015, estimates of the age of the Y-MRCA range around 200,000 to 300,000 years ago, roughly consistent with the emergence of anatomically modern humans.[6]

The name "Mitochondrial Eve" alludes to the biblical Eve, which has led to repeated misrepresentations or misconceptions in journalistic accounts on the topic. Popular science presentations of the topic usually point out such possible misconceptions by emphasizing the fact that the position of mt-MRCA is neither fixed in time (as the position of mt-MRCA moves forward in time as mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) lineages become extinct), nor does it refer to a "first woman", nor the only living female of her time, nor the first member of a "new species"



Oh I see. So Adam and Eve mysteriously didn't live at the same time. And there wasn't just one Mitochondrial Eve, but rather there were many, including many other women living both alongside and before the Mt-MRCA.

And regarding the Sumerian kings list, you aren't addressing anything. There are more lists than just the Sumerian kings list. There are Assyrian kings lists, Babylonian kings lists, Hittite Kings lists, Egyptian kings lists, among others. And they oftentimes include theological heroes of old that aren't actually literal people. They aren't like geneologies today, derived from genetics.

But furthermore, the Sumerian kings list, as per your own article, points out long ages as a product of thematic use of the number 60, not actually being natural or true ages. And by that logic, no one would then conclude these to be literal long ages anyway.

Again, the Bible is not a science textbook. And if you think that it is, then your own arguments debunk Eve as the first human woman and they show that in ancient cultures, figures like Adam were mythological and didn't actually live the long ages as described.
 
Upvote 0

FaithT

Well-Known Member
Dec 1, 2019
4,234
1,922
64
St. Louis
✟438,977.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And in verse 28, God gave mankind dominion over the animals. This verse doesn't contradict verse 28.


This is fine. But this doesn't exclude consumption of meat. The ground is cursed, and people are going to have to work for their food. Obviously Adam didn't just live off of bread after the fall. This doesn't even make any sense because even YECs recognize that animal death occurred after the fall. So it sounds strange that God would command Adam to live off of bread while everyone else was eating meat anyway.




Ok. So that negates your prior post-fall references.

Thanks.


Nope. You're missing a verse again.

"Genesis 9:4 NIV
[4] “But you must not eat meat that has its lifeblood still in it."

All dietary rulings in the old testament begin with that which was already being consumed (which you've already acknowledged) followed by the prohibitive ruling.

Example:
Deuteronomy 14:3-4, 7, 9-12 NIV
[3] Do not eat any detestable thing.

[4] These are the animals you may eat: the ox, the sheep, the goat,
[7] However, of those that chew the cud or that have a divided hoof you may not eat the camel, the rabbit or the hyrax. Although they chew the cud, they do not have a divided hoof; they are ceremonially unclean for you.

[9] Of all the creatures living in the water, you may eat any that has fins and scales. [10] But anything that does not have fins and scales you may not eat; for you it is unclean.

[11] You may eat any clean bird. [12] But these you may not eat: the eagle, the vulture, the black vulture,

These verses are not saying that the Isrealites never ate sheep or goat or fish or birds. Or that God is just now giving the Isrealites permission to eat their sheep for the first time. It's acknowledging that these are already aspects of their diet. Then the prohibition follows.

Its the same structure as Genesis 9:3-4. Indeed, people in Genesis, much like the Isrealites in Deuteronomy and Leviticus, were already consuming meat identified in the first verse. The second verse introduces the prohibition as a sub category of what was already being consumed.


Nope. See above.

Additionally, in Genesis 1, God commanded mankind to subdue and rule over all the animals. But you can do a word study with strongs concordance on these terms. They typically hold war-time and armed struggle connotations. Like subduing a lion for example (and I'm not talking about Narnia lions, I'm talking about meat eating lions that might endanger your sheep). Subdue and rule. That's the real message God was giving Adam and Eve.

Got didn't tell Adam and Eve to subdue wild fish and birds so that they could start an aquarium and a petting zoo. This is ancient near east conquest language. It's not clear to me what Adam would even do with a wild salmon other than eat it anyway.

In contrast, God also instructed the Isrealites to subdue and rule over the land of Canaan. And we all know how that went.

Examples:

Zechariah 9:15 KJV
[15] The LORD of hosts shall defend them; and they shall devour, and subdue with sling stones; and they shall drink, and make a noise as through wine; and they shall be filled like bowls, and as the corners of the altar.


Joshua 17:17-18 NIV
[17] But Joshua said to the tribes of Joseph—to Ephraim and Manasseh—“You are numerous and very powerful. You will have not only one allotment [18] but the forested hill country as well. Clear it, and its farthest limits will be yours; though the Canaanites have chariots fitted with iron and though they are strong, you can drive them out.”

Joshua 18:1 KJV
[1] And the whole congregation of the children of Israel assembled together at Shiloh, and set up the tabernacle of the congregation there. And the land was subdued before them.

2 Samuel 8:11-14 NIV
[11] King David dedicated these articles to the Lord, as he had done with the silver and gold from all the nations he had subdued: [12] Edom and Moab, the Ammonites and the Philistines, and Amalek. He also dedicated the plunder taken from Hadadezer son of Rehob, king of Zobah. [13] And David became famous after he returned from striking down eighteen thousand Edomites in the Valley of Salt. [14] He put garrisons throughout Edom, and all the Edomites became subject to David. The Lord gave David victory wherever he went.

When God commands people to subdue in the old testament, he's not talking about starting a petting zoo. The world beyond Eden was a dangerous place. So much so that Cain feared for his life when he was being exiled (notice that no other sons or daughters were yet mentioned, so who did he fear?).

And that's the true story of Genesis that you won't hear on Sunday school, censored for kids.
Just jumping in here. Do you subscribe to the theory that God created people before Adam and Eve that evolved but didn’t have souls to make them human and then gave Adam and Eve souls, making them and their offspring human? Or what?
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,356
3,178
Hartford, Connecticut
✟354,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Just jumping in here. Do you subscribe to the theory that God created people before Adam and Eve that evolved but didn’t have souls to make them human and then gave Adam and Eve souls, making them and their offspring human? Or what?
Moses lived over 2,000 years ago. And he wouldn't have known about evolution when writing Genesis. For that reason, I wouldn't expect the Bible to talk about it. Aside from living things being nephesh, the term for souls. I'm not sure that the old testament offers a description of when ensoulment occurs. So I don't have a further opinion that. And I personally view Genesis chapter 1 as occurring before Genesis chapter 2. That is, the creation of humanity prior to the creation of Adam and Eve.
 
Upvote 0

Semper-Fi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2019
2,001
861
Pacific north west
✟563,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
And yet every biologist on planet earth has mysteriously missed that all people originated from one woman? Oh that's right:
And yet you do not even believe this, you claim
God made a population of people all at once.

From wiki on mitochondrial Eve:
Sorry but I would not believe in outdated material from wiki.
New research provides evidence of a dramatically reduced “age of Eve.”

Oh I see. So Adam and Eve mysteriously didn't live at the same time.
No Adam and Eve lived together and God married them.
Mitochondrial Eve and Y-Chromosome Adam did not know each other.

Seems you know nothing about Mitochondrial Eve and how it works.
All human beings contain mitochondrial dna (mtdna). While a son and
daughter receive mitochondria from the mother, only the daughter will
pass it on to her descendants. This provides a useful tool for geneticists
to determine female lineage.

Y-Chromosome Adam is a lot more difficult to trace genealogically,
as opposed to mtdna. Geneticists concur that all humans alive came
from just one paternal ancestor.

"All humans descended from Adam and Eve. But only Noah, his wife,
and his three sons and their wives survived the Great Flood (a “bottleneck”
of sorts that, according to biblical chronology, happened around 4,500
years ago). It is from Noah’s family that all humanity derives.

The closest common Y-chromosomal ancestor, then, would be Noah,
who passed on his “Ys” to his three sons. But the mitochondrial Eve
would have long predated this—the unique mitochondrial dna being
carried on not from Noah’s wife, but from the sons’ wives, passed on
to their future daughters."
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,356
3,178
Hartford, Connecticut
✟354,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
And yet you do not even believe this, you claim
God made a population of people all at once.
The Bible is not a science textbook.

All of your counterpoints avoid addressing the Bible on its own terms.

The Bible is not communicating in a modern scientific genre. I don't think that the Bible is communicating any modern scientific information because that's not what the Bible is about.
 
Upvote 0

Semper-Fi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2019
2,001
861
Pacific north west
✟563,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
The Bible is not a science textbook.
True the bible is not a science book, then why do you keep saying bible writers
used science to discover and recorded it in the bible their findings.
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,356
3,178
Hartford, Connecticut
✟354,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
True the bible is not a science book, then why do you keep saying bible writers
used science to discover and recorded it in the bible their findings.
Did I say something about Moses using science to discover things? Also, the Mt DNA eve additionally doesn't make sense in that there have been many Mt DNA eves, not just one.
 
Upvote 0

Semper-Fi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2019
2,001
861
Pacific north west
✟563,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Did I say something about Moses using science to discover things?

Every time you post "acient near east [cosmology] that is

You claim Biblical cosmology refers to the biblical writers' understanding of the cosmos..

cos·mol·o·gy
[käzˈmäləjē]
noun
the [science of] the origin and development of...

Explain what biblical writer used science to discover the heavens are strethed out.
Explain what science they used to find murdock stretched out blood from a dead
god to make heaven.
 
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,356
3,178
Hartford, Connecticut
✟354,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Every time you post "acient near east [cosmology] that is


You claim Biblical cosmology refers to the biblical writers' understanding of the cosmos..

cos·mol·o·gy
[käzˈmäləjē]
noun
the [science of] the origin and development of...

Explain what biblical writer used science to discover the heavens are strethed out.
Explain what science they used to find murdock stretched out blood from a dead
god to make heaven.
You're misunderstanding what ancient Israelite cosmology is. It has nothing to do with science.

Cosmology in ancient context is how people in the past understood and described the world and the heavens based on their observations, beliefs, and cultural context.

As opposed to modern cosmology. A field of scientific study. The branch of astronomy and physics that studies the origin, structure, evolution, and ultimate fate of the universe.
This is modern cosmology, built on evidence, mathematics, physics, and the scientific method.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Semper-Fi

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
May 26, 2019
2,001
861
Pacific north west
✟563,444.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
You're misunderstanding what ancient Israelite cosmology is. It has nothing to do with science.
cosmology is [the science of].....you need to change your definition then.
The bible is a religious book, Enuma Elish is pagan religion not science.

Cosmology in ancient context is how people in the past understood and described the world and the heavens based on their observations, beliefs, and cultural context.
Many believe as do I that God is the author of the Bible. According to 2 Timothy 3:16,
Scripture is "breathed out" by God, indicating divine inspiration.

While human authors wrote the texts, it is believed that God guided these writers
through the Holy Spirit, making Him the ultimate author of the Bible.

God revealed some truths to Bible [writers] long before [scientists]
came to understand them. It does not mean Bible writers/prophets
understood everything that they wrote or prophesied about.

How did Job know Angeles shouted for joy when the earth was made.
How could Job describe the deep-sea floor and a bioluminescent creature.

Science wise
the Babylonians were known for their meticulous observations
and recorded data, laying the foundation for early astronomy.

Yet the Babylonian Creation myths like Enuma Elish has nothing
to do with science or observations. An unknown poet writes a poem
about a false pagan god killing another god and spreading its
blood out to form heaven. You calling that cos·mol·o·gy is false.
Even claiming above was their observations is still a false claim.

What biblical writer used their "observations" to show the heavens was
stretching out? none This was only confirmed recently by the Hubble telescope.
What observation did a poet use to claim murdock stretched out blood? none

If you want, I could give a whole list of things mentioned in the bible that
has nothing to do with the writers' observations of his surroundings.

God says He alone stretched out the Heavens.

As opposed to modern cosmology. A field of scientific study. The branch of astronomy and physics that studies the origin, structure, evolution, and ultimate fate of the universe.
This is modern cosmology, built on evidence, mathematics, physics, and the scientific method.
What about prophecy's that's dotted in most every book of the bible.
Did bible writers also use observations and understanding to/in prophecy?

Only God Himself can foretell the future and have it recorded in the book.
Geneses 3 has prophecy still unfulfilled. 2 Peter 1:20-21 , Isaiah 46:10
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,356
3,178
Hartford, Connecticut
✟354,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
cosmology is [the science of].....you need to change your definition then.
My definition, which aligns with 99% of Biblical scholarship today, is perfectly fine.

Thanks.

And you're welcome to cope all day on the topic. But the Bible says what it says.

There is nothing scientific about the sky being a solid dome or windows of the sky opening and closing to let water through during the flood.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Recalculating!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,535
11,443
Space Mountain!
✟1,350,152.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Last edited:
  • Informative
Reactions: Job 33:6
Upvote 0

Job 33:6

Well-Known Member
Jun 15, 2017
9,356
3,178
Hartford, Connecticut
✟354,540.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
  • Like
Reactions: 2PhiloVoid
Upvote 0

2PhiloVoid

Critically Recalculating!
Site Supporter
Oct 28, 2006
24,535
11,443
Space Mountain!
✟1,350,152.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I'll have to check out these resources. Thanks.

I thought I'd just add to the stockpile, even if they each come at the issue from slightly different angles. ;)
 
Upvote 0