Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Remember back in school when they told you to show your work? Same principle.
I would say that as long as you actually investigate, go with what you find. As I said, even though I believe that it is a much higher number than the ones reported due to testimonies from people in the know about trafficked border crossings, but who testimonies I can’t reproduce, I’m not even going to bring those numbers into the discussion and went with the much smaller, but more verifiable number, for the discussion.
As a trained journalist myself, I tend to view claims with skepticism, and if they can't be documented, I tend to doubt them until I have good reason not to.
And yet, that's exactly what you have done.
Not true. It’s reproducible enough somewhere on the internet that google’s AI can create a summation about it. And short of looking through hours of video clips to find the ones I’ve heard, which verify google’s AI summation, I’m going with that. But I understand that you are skeptical of it.
Look, let's put aside the question of whether or not your figures are correct. I'll admit, refusing to substantiate claims is a pet peeve of mine. I'll even concede the point, for the sake of argument, though the Supreme Court did reverse the lower court order.
You never responded to my previous post about the supposed denial of due process and the Abrego Garcia incident. Where else has that been an issue? And if it is really an issue, why did the SC green light the program?
Supposed? Did he get due process before Trump shipped him off or didn't he? Maybe I missed it.
Can't recall the SCOTUS reasoning at the moment, but I'll check into it. As a guess, there does seem to be a tendency among certain justices toward favoring a more authoritarian executive branch that I find troubling, to say the least.
You have repeated that charge numbers of times
Will you be documenting your repeated claims against the Justices with documentation? I am not a trained journalist, but I view them with skepticism because you have not addressed previous queries with specificity.
Actually, I've avoided making specific claims. I have voiced my opinion, however. Is that not okay with you?
Fine with me. Everyone's entitled to their own opinion.
Feel free to not care about my opinion, then.
At some point I quit providing sources for most things. I used to spend a ton of time locating, saving and logging sources and proving my points. I quit doing that for most things.
While the 14th Amendment doesn't explicitly say more on the subject, it was brought up in the debate. For example, from Senator John Conness, in response to Senator Edward Cowan's concern that the amendment would grant citizenship to the children of Gypsies and Chinese immigrants, thus tying them to the country:
ETA: should have read the next page lol
www.christianforums.com
