Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
The Supreme Court ordered Biden to reinstall the Trump border policies in 2021 which he ignored.
Do you mean this decision:
www.texastribune.org
Uh, not quite.
www.wakeuptopolitics.com
There is no evidence that is occurring. This ruling placed limits but did not end nation wide injunctions. Litigants will have to change the suits so that nation wide injunctions can be applied.
All judges offer their opinion about how the law and the Constitution is applied to the specific case at hand. Their opinions then become the decision of the court.
If you feel this, or any, Supreme Court decision is contrary to the Constitution, feel free to voice your own opinion.
[/QUOTE]Do you mean this decision:
Supreme Court rules Biden administration can end “remain in Mexico” policy, sending case back to a Texas court
The Trump administration created the Migrant Protection Protocols, also called “remain in Mexico,” in 2019 before the Biden administration canceled it in 2021. The ruling sends the case back to a Texas federal court.
Not quite as you remember it?
Actually, it turns out the second attempt was also illegal and the Supreme Court halted that, also. As I noted earlier.Uh, not quite.
No, Biden didn’t defy the Supreme Court on student loans
And neither did Trump on TikTok!
When President Biden tried to forgive student loan debt through the HEROES act, that was ruled unconstitutional. He did not defy that order, he simply found another way to do it that wasn't unconstitutional.
-- A2SG, so not the same....
No it has not.
Irrelevant. The parents are. The parents are citizens of another country and do not have legal rights to remain in this country. Children born of citizens of another country who do not have a legal right to remain in this one should be citizens of the country of the parents.
This touches upon how we read the 14th Amendment. It concerned Slavery in America and the ending of it.
It is one thing to disagree. But to pretend this has already been settled is another. The supreme court is taking this up because this particular issue has not been decided. Birthright citizenship. has simply been a term erroneously used which is like undocumented immigrant, instead of illegal alien. This will be decided. We will see where it goes. Alien is a term to denote non citizen, ie a citizen elsewhere. Heck, dreamers took it to another step further. That slippery slope of not enforcing law....
They already did.
No, the baby born in the United States does.
You know this is such a problem today that is the court decided on the side of illegal aliens, then I think it is possible there will be a call to amend the constitution to clarify it to the will of the people. There just might be enough to support this to actually do it. People are tired of this stuff.
Why do you say this when you know it is untrue?
The baby does not make the parent here legally. Nor does it alter the illegal actions to be here.
No it is about the status of the parent, with regards to a child born.
No, the Supreme court will decide this. And you know full well they will. You may like their decision, you may not like their decision. But this is yet to be determined.
Irrelevant. The birthright clause of the 14th amendment only mentions the rights of the children born within the US. They are citizens. Full stop. It doesn’t qualify that the parents have to be here legally. It doesn’t state that either of the parents need to be citizens. It says very plainly ALL PERSONS BORN.
