John Fetterman Rips Fellow Democrats For Not Condemning LA Riots

Always in His Presence · Jun 10, 2025

John Fetterman Rips Fellow Democrats For Not Condemning LA Riots

Democrat Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman took to social media Monday to criticize his fellow Democrats for not denouncing the violent riots that broke out in Los Angeles after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid.

In a post on X, Fetterman said he was disappointed in his party’s failure to take a firm stand against the destruction, calling the situation “anarchy and true chaos.” He said that the Democratic Party risks losing its moral high ground when it fails to unequivocally condemn such actions.

No I am not a fan of Fetterman and he did not suddenly become important. It is a discussion topic plainly stated

‘This Is Anarchy’: John Fetterman Rips Fellow Democrats For Not Condemning LA Riots

Democrat Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman took to social media Monday to criticize his fellow Democrats for not denouncing the violent

ijr.com

Vambram · Jun 10, 2025

Fetterman calls out 'anarchy' in LA, noting that Dems forfeit 'moral high ground' by failing to decry violence.
Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., spoke out against the "anarchy and true chaos" in Los Angeles, declaring that Democrats forfeit "moral high ground" if they do not decry the violence.

"I unapologetically stand for free speech, peaceful demonstrations, and immigration—but this is not that. This is anarchy and true chaos. My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement," Fetterman declared in a post on X.

Elon Musk replied to Fetterman's post with an American flag emoji.

Ohio gubernatorial candidate Vivek Ramaswamy noted, "It’s hard to preach hard truths to your own side. I respect this."

Deputy White House chief of staff and Cabinet secretary Taylor Budowich responded to Fetterman in a post, writing: "This is a wake up call for many Democrats: there is no room for you in the party of @GavinNewsom and @KamalaHarris. Their self-obsessed pursuits of power are blind to you and your concerns. They defend chaos, reject biology, and are unbothered by the invasion of our nation."

Fetterman calls out 'anarchy' in LA, noting that Dems forfeit 'moral high ground' by failing to decry violence

Fetterman called out the unrest in Los Angeles as "anarchy," noting that his "party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement."

www.foxnews.com

rambot · Jun 10, 2025

While I appreciate that he's noticing that Democrats have the moral highground, I take exception with how he chooses to maintain his focus.

Vambram · Jun 10, 2025

rambot said:
While I appreciate that he's noticing that Democrats have the moral highground, I take exception with how he chooses to maintain his focus.

The Democratic Party does not have anywhere close to the moral high ground.

rambot · Jun 10, 2025

Vambram said:
The Democratic Party does not have anywhere close to the moral high ground.

Over the Republicans, yes.

To be clear, it doesn't have moral high ground, just in comparison to Republicans.

Vambram · Jun 10, 2025

rambot said:
Over the Republicans, yes.

To be clear, it doesn't have moral high ground, just in comparison to Republicans.

Incorrect.

chevyontheriver · Jun 10, 2025

Always in His Presence said:
John Fetterman Rips Fellow Democrats For Not Condemning LA Riots

Democrat Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman took to social media Monday to criticize his fellow Democrats for not denouncing the violent riots that broke out in Los Angeles after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid.

In a post on X, Fetterman said he was disappointed in his party’s failure to take a firm stand against the destruction, calling the situation “anarchy and true chaos.” He said that the Democratic Party risks losing its moral high ground when it fails to unequivocally condemn such actions.

No I am not a fan of Fetterman and he did not suddenly become important. It is a discussion topic plainly stated

‘This Is Anarchy’: John Fetterman Rips Fellow Democrats For Not Condemning LA Riots

Democrat Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman took to social media Monday to criticize his fellow Democrats for not denouncing the violent

ijr.com

Fetter man is going to get himself ‘primaried’ out of a job by some loyal properly woke D-hack. Ideological purity is paramount to the woke mobsters.

Oompa Loompa · Jun 10, 2025

Always in His Presence said:
John Fetterman Rips Fellow Democrats For Not Condemning LA Riots

Democrat Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman took to social media Monday to criticize his fellow Democrats for not denouncing the violent riots that broke out in Los Angeles after an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) raid.

In a post on X, Fetterman said he was disappointed in his party’s failure to take a firm stand against the destruction, calling the situation “anarchy and true chaos.” He said that the Democratic Party risks losing its moral high ground when it fails to unequivocally condemn such actions.

No I am not a fan of Fetterman and he did not suddenly become important. It is a discussion topic plainly stated

‘This Is Anarchy’: John Fetterman Rips Fellow Democrats For Not Condemning LA Riots

Democrat Pennsylvania Sen. John Fetterman took to social media Monday to criticize his fellow Democrats for not denouncing the violent

ijr.com

How do they risk "losing a moral high ground" that they never had in the first place?

Fantine · Jun 10, 2025

LA law enforcement said it was just a few troublemakers, perhaps even planted, until Trump unconstitutionally sent in armies to fight our citizens.
Back in 1970, when Americans had not sold their souls to a megalomaniacal demagogue, Lent State was a big deal. "Four Dead in Ohio" topped the charts.
Evil of this magnitude was unheard of.

Vambram · Jun 10, 2025

Fantine said:
LA law enforcement said it was just a few troublemakers, perhaps even planted, until Trump unconstitutionally sent in armies to fight our citizens.
Back in 1970, when Americans had not sold their souls to a megalomaniacal demagogue, Lent State was a big deal. "Four Dead in Ohio" topped the charts.
Evil of this magnitude was unheard of.

Unfortunately, this post is not factually accurate.

rambot · Jun 10, 2025

Vambram said:
Unfortunately, this post is not factually accurate.

Vague proclamations do little to prove your point.

GoldenBoy89 · Jun 10, 2025

Vambram said:
The Democratic Party does not have anywhere close to the moral high ground.

Over who, the felon?

GoldenBoy89 · Jun 10, 2025

chevyontheriver said:
Fetter man is going to get himself ‘primaried’ out of a job by some loyal properly woke D-hack. Ideological purity is paramount to the woke mobsters.

Yes he may even get the Liz Cheney treatment.

ozso · Jun 10, 2025

Fantine said:
LA law enforcement said it was just a few troublemakers, perhaps even planted, until Trump unconstitutionally sent in armies to fight our citizens.

Source please?

Vambram · Jun 10, 2025

GoldenBoy89 said:
Over who, the felon?

Only people in the Democratic Party and their voters actually believe in the legitimacy of calling President Donald Trump a felon.

Vambram · Jun 10, 2025

rambot said:
Vague proclamations do little to prove your point.

I truly doubt that anyone could dissuade you from your point of view on this topic.

GoldenBoy89 · Jun 10, 2025

Vambram said:
Only people in the Democratic Party and their voters actually believe in the legitimacy of calling President Donald Trump a felon.

Nope. Looks like the entire state of New York court system still has Donald Trump as a convicted 34 count felon.

People v Donald J. Trump (Criminal) | NYCOURTS.GOV

Decision & Order: Motion to Terminate Order Restricting Extrajudicial Statements, June 25Presence of Counsel at Presentence Order, June 7Letter to Parties, June 7

ww2.nycourts.gov

BPPLEE · Jun 10, 2025

GoldenBoy89 said:
Nope. Looks like the entire state of New York court system still has Donald Trump as a convicted 34 count felon.

People v Donald J. Trump (Criminal) | NYCOURTS.GOV

Decision & Order: Motion to Terminate Order Restricting Extrajudicial Statements, June 25Presence of Counsel at Presentence Order, June 7Letter to Parties, June 7

ww2.nycourts.gov

Yep, and Kamala still lost to him.

GoldenBoy89 · Jun 10, 2025

BPPLEE said:
Yep, and Kamala still lost to him.

She sure did just like he lost to Biden only, not by as much.

Trump apparently can only win running against a terribly unpopular woman.

It’s a good thing politics aren’t a gendered sport.

BPPLEE · Jun 10, 2025

GoldenBoy89 said:
She sure did just like he lost to Biden only, not by as much.

Trump apparently can only win running against a terribly unpopular woman.

It’s a good thing politics aren’t a gendered sport.

Shame on the Democrats for running terribly unpopular women, even one who replaced an even more unpopular man.
Seems like both parties could select better candidates in their primaries

John Fetterman Rips Fellow Democrats For Not Condemning LA Riots

Jesus is the only Way