• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Supreme Court will allow Trump administration to end TPS program for Venezuelans

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,691
5,498
Minnesota
✟307,142.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
7,298
3,669
82
Goldsboro NC
✟246,182.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
3,429
5,811
51
Florida
✟307,439.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
25,399
27,903
LA
✟617,431.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
No special treatment just because they are likely Democrat voters.
What exactly makes them likely Democrat voters? It seems at least a little prejudice to assume all these different people would vote the same way.
 
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

One nation indivisible
Mar 11, 2017
20,898
15,785
55
USA
✟398,069.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,323
19,501
29
Nebraska
✟682,491.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,023
16,235
Fort Smith
✟1,377,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
What exactly makes them likely Democrat voters? It seems at least a little prejudice to assume all these different people would vote the same way.
Refugees with protected status are not citizens. If Republicans fear they will vote, they must be low information voters who have no business voting themselves.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,323
19,501
29
Nebraska
✟682,491.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Refugees with protected status are not citizens. If Republicans fear they will vote, they must be low information voters who have no business voting themselves.
Refugees are human beings and should have their humanity respected. Period. Saying that as a very moderate Republican.
 
Upvote 0

Fantine

Dona Quixote
Site Supporter
Jun 11, 2005
41,023
16,235
Fort Smith
✟1,377,370.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
N
Refugees are human beings and should have their humanity respected. Period. Saying that as a very moderate Republican.
I agree. The deportations without due process to Salvadoran gulags are inhumane. But I had been addressing the allegation that these refugees are democratic voters. They cannot vote.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
33,323
19,501
29
Nebraska
✟682,491.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
N

I agree. The deportations without due process to Salvadoran gulags are inhumane. But I had been addressing the allegation that these refugees are democratic voters. They cannot vote.
Ok. Thanks for the info!

Blessings
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fantine
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
27,278
8,688
65
✟419,172.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
Good. This is another blow to the left who wants to take away tye Executive branches right to govern. It absolutely ridiculous that one executive branch can set something in place and the next cannot remove it.

Man if Trump sets something in place should it take a Supreme Court ruling in order for the next Democratic president to to remove it? If this is the standard then Trump better get busy and get more things in place.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
11,691
5,498
Minnesota
✟307,142.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Enough with the "illegal voter conspiracy theories."
The pool of those who can vote illegally was raised 10 million plus by the Biden administration. And there are many Democrats who staunchly oppose voter ID.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Hans Blaster

One nation indivisible
Mar 11, 2017
20,898
15,785
55
USA
✟398,069.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
The pool of those who can vote illegally was raised 10 million plus by the Biden administration. And there are many Democrats who staunchly oppose voter ID.
Sigh :rolleyes:
 
  • Agree
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

A2SG

Gumby
Jun 17, 2008
9,491
3,647
Massachusetts
✟160,882.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Enough with the "illegal voter conspiracy theories."
But...but..."people are saying" this happens all the time, so it must be true!

-- A2SG, no, no one knows who those people are....why do you ask?
 
Upvote 0

The IbanezerScrooge

I can't believe what I'm hearing...
Sep 1, 2015
3,429
5,811
51
Florida
✟307,439.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
It's pretty much liberals who care about a person's color.
Really? Because the order to bring those people here specifically mentioned their European decent. I assume you have no issues with these people being brought in for... reasons, but the Venezuelans that have already been granted status need to go, again for ... reasons.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaisyDay
Upvote 0

DaisyDay

I Did Nothing Wrong!! ~~Team Deep State
Jan 7, 2003
41,297
19,512
Finger Lakes
✟295,501.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Unitarian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Good. This is another blow to the left who wants to take away tye Executive branches right to govern.
On the contrary, we want the Executive branch to faithfully execute the laws Congress makes.

It absolutely ridiculous that one executive branch can set something in place and the next cannot remove it.
EOs are commonly removed from one administration to the next. EOs have force within the Executive Branch, but, technically, not beyond it as they are not laws of the land but merely executive directive that have force only on the executive branch. Congress makes the laws while the Executive Branch is supposed to administer those laws faithfully.

Man if Trump sets something in place should it take a Supreme Court ruling in order for the next Democratic president to to remove it? If this is the standard then Trump better get busy and get more things in place.
Trump has already gotten busy with more EOs than anyone, than everyone put together. Unfortunately, some, such as ending birthright citizenship, are blatantly against the Constitution. This violates his oath of office - which he seems confused about. When asked if he had to follow the Constitution, Donald just said, "I don't know" the same week the totally not reptilian Miller declared that habeas corpus[ was being "actively looked at" by the White House - actively looking at suspending one of America's foundational freedoms.
 
Upvote 0

rjs330

Well-Known Member
CF Ambassadors
May 22, 2015
27,278
8,688
65
✟419,172.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Pentecostal
On the contrary, we want the Executive branch to faithfully execute the laws Congress makes.
As do we all.
EOs are commonly removed from one administration to the next. EOs have force within the Executive Branch, but, technically, not beyond it as they are not laws of the land but merely executive directive that have force only on the executive branch. Congress makes the laws while the Executive Branch is supposed to administer those laws faithfully.
They can be, but apparently the left doesn't want to allow him to. They want him to.have to go through the courts in order to undo a previous EO. I bet when a Democrat president comes in you won't expect him to have to get a court ruling to undo Trump EOs. This has become a HUGE overreach by courts who have NO authority to deal with his EOs. If you say rhey do rhen I fully expect you to support rhe next Democratic president having to go through the courts to overturn any Trump EOs.

What laws aren't Trump administering?
 
Upvote 0