• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • Christian Forums is looking to bring on new moderators to the CF Staff Team! If you have been an active member of CF for at least three months with 200 posts during that time, you're eligible to apply! This is a great way to give back to CF and keep the forums running smoothly! If you're interested, you can submit your application here!

The concept of Logos from Heraclitus to John

tonychanyt

24/7 Christian
Oct 2, 2011
6,061
2,231
Toronto
Visit site
✟188,840.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
In the 5th century BCE, Heraclitus used the word Logos to describe the rational principle that governed the universe, a kind of cosmic order or divine reason. Later philosophers, such as the Stoics, expanded on this idea, viewing the Logos as the animating force behind creation, the source of all coherence and meaning in the world. For them, the Logos was impersonal and abstract, not a personal being.

Around the time of Chirst, Philo of Alexandria, a Hellenistic Jewish philosopher, developed a sophisticated theology of the Logos, blending Jewish scripture with Greek philosophy. The Logos was God’s intermediary between the transcendent, unknowable Creator and the material world. The Logos was the instrument through which God fashioned the universe (On the Creation 20–25). The Logos was the High Priest who interceded for humanity before God (On Dreams 1.215). The Logos was the firstborn Son of God (On Agricultura 51). Philo’s Logos was semi-personified, more than an abstract principle but less than a distinct person, unlike the later Christian view of the Trinity.

John borrowed some of Philo's ideas, 1:

1 In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. 2He was in the beginning with God. 3 All things were made through him, and without him was not any thing made that was made. 4In him was life,a and the life was the light of men.
Strong's Greek: 3056. λόγος (logos) — 331 Occurrences

It was a common word that had a wide range of dictionary meanings. However, John used it in a technical and philosophical sense. That's why ESV translated it with a capital W.

Thayer's Greek Lexicon:

reason, the mental faculty of thinking, meditating, reasoning, calculating, etc.
BDAG:
① a communication whereby the mind finds expression, word
② computation, reckoning
③ the independent personified expression of God, the Logos. Our lit. shows traces of a way of thinking that was widespread in contemporary syncretism, as well as in Jewish wisdom lit. and Philo, the most prominent feature of which is the concept of the Logos, the independent, personified ‘Word’ (of God)

BDAG③ lists plenty of extra-biblical writings about it, including Philo.

Is there evidence that "the Word" in John 1 would have been expected to be a personal being?

Yes. Jn 1:

14 The Word became flesh and dwelt among us, and we have seen his glory, glory as of the only Sond from the Father, full of grace and truth.
John took an extra step beyond Philo. He declared the Logos took on flesh as a human being.

Greek philosophers used the term Logos as an abstract concept. Philo made it semi-concrete. John quated the concept to the person of Jesus.

Logos is a multifaceted concept, spanning language, reason, divine principle, and structured thought. The English word "logic" is derived from the Greek word "logos."
 
Last edited:

KevinT

Well-Known Member
May 26, 2021
813
414
57
Tennessee
✟54,639.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
It was a common word that had a wide range of meanings. However, John used it in a technical and philosophical sense. ...
③ the independent personified expression of God, the Logos. Our lit. shows traces of a way of thinking that was widespread in contemporary syncretism, as well as in Jewish wisdom lit. and Philo, the most prominent feature of which is the concept of the Logos, the independent, personified ‘Word’ (of God)

Logos is a multifaceted concept, spanning language, reason, divine principle, and structured thought. The English word "logic" is derived from the Greek word "logos."

Maybe you answered this and I missed it, but isn't John using the word Logos in a way that was different from others? I.e. He is equating Logos with God.

In college, I had to read Meditations by Marcus Aurelius (a Roman Emperor and Stoic philosopher), where he frequently addressed the concept of "logos". Per ChatGPT: "In Stoic philosophy, "logos" refers to the rational order and principle that governs the universe, and it is a central theme in his reflections. Marcus Aurelius often contemplated the nature of the universe, human rationality, and the interconnectedness of all things, which are all tied to the Stoic understanding of "logos.""

Aurelius died 180 AD, so the use of the word could have changed substantially from John's time. In your link, below, ...
Within Hellenistic Judaism, Philo (c. 20 BC – c.  50 AD) integrated the term into Jewish philosophy.[10] Philo distinguished between logos prophorikos ("the uttered word") and the logos endiathetos ("the word remaining within").[11]
... Philo would be more contemporary to John, but even he seems to be using the word differently.

Logos is a multifaceted concept, spanning language, reason, divine principle, and structured thought. The English word "logic" is derived from the Greek word "logos."

But when John equates this "logic" with God, it seems completely different to me.

KT
 
  • Useful
Reactions: tonychanyt
Upvote 0

trophy33

Well-Known Member
Nov 18, 2018
12,786
5,116
European Union
✟212,275.00
Country
Czech Republic
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
But when John equates this "logic" with God, it seems completely different to me.
Philo also treats the divine powers of God as a single independent being, or demiurge, which he designates "Logos". Philo's conception of the Logos is influenced by Heraclitus' conception of the "dividing Logos" (λόγος τομεύς), which calls the various objects into existence by the combination of contrasts ("Quis Rerum Divinarum Heres Sit," § 43 [i. 503]), as well as the Stoic characterization of the Logos as the active and vivifying power.

But Philo followed the Platonic distinction between imperfect matter and perfect Form, and Philo's conception of the Logos is directly related to the Middle Platonic view of God as unmoved and utterly transcendent; therefore, intermediary beings were necessary to bridge the enormous gap between God and the material world. The Logos was the highest of these intermediary beings and was called by Philo "the first-born of God."
 
  • Useful
Reactions: KevinT
Upvote 0

tonychanyt

24/7 Christian
Oct 2, 2011
6,061
2,231
Toronto
Visit site
✟188,840.00
Country
Canada
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Maybe you answered this and I missed it, but isn't John using the word Logos in a way that was different from others? I.e. He is equating Logos with God.
Excellent point.

I rewrote my OP. Take another look. Feel free to follow up :)
 
  • Useful
Reactions: KevinT
Upvote 0