Just like there was no evidence of the Biden lap top.There was no evidence of cognitive decline by Biden.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Just like there was no evidence of the Biden lap top.There was no evidence of cognitive decline by Biden.
SMHThere was no evidence of cognitive decline by Biden.
Thank God the Biden family is finally irrelevant. I doubt ANY of the future Biden's will have a career in politics. Joe deserves a nice, peaceful, retirement!Just like there was no evidence of the Biden lap top.
You do you. I don't believe in the liberal media, so that makes everything I say not believable. If you say so.That's certainly a claim about a post which starts out "Did you...". A believable claim? I'll let others decide.
No one is saying anything about "diagnosis." Rather, look at his behavior.Nobody made such a claim. But only a doctor can make a diagnosis.
You do realize the only person making this claim is you, right?I don't believe in the liberal media, so that makes everything I say not believable.
No. Other people said the same about fear mongering from the MSM.You do realize the only person making this claim is you, right?
The reasons other people might think your posts are not believable is well documented by what they actually wrote.
Which people are you asserting have said that the reason your posts are not believable is because you don't "believe in the liberal media", whatever that means? Please be specific.No. Other people said the same about fear mongering from the MSM.
I was referring to post 2.Which people are you asserting have said that the reason your posts are not believable is because you don't "believe in the liberal media", whatever that means? Please be specific.
It's like you were writing today's headlines yesterday!…by firing 12 Inspectors General in one go, likely breaking the law in the process.
Jeremy’s going to be looking for a new job soon.It's like you were writing today's headlines yesterday!
Trump probably 'violated the law' when he fired independent watchdogs, judge says
“There's not any real dispute that that just violated the law, right, government?” Judge Reyes asked.
“What I would say is we don't dispute that the president did not comply with the sentence in the statute calling for congressional notice,” said DOJ attorney Jeremy Newman
It's the reason why Trump fired all those IGs from all those varying agencies on darn near day one.It's like you were writing today's headlines yesterday!
Trump probably 'violated the law' when he fired independent watchdogs, judge says
“There's not any real dispute that that just violated the law, right, government?” Judge Reyes asked.
“What I would say is we don't dispute that the president did not comply with the sentence in the statute calling for congressional notice,” said DOJ attorney Jeremy Newman
and then some more. But fortunately, Trump put Elon Musk on the case to root out $2 trillion waste. Of course, that $2T got trimmed down as time went on.…by firing 12 Inspectors General in one go
“Waste, fraud and abuse” goes in the same bucket as “voter fraud”; yes, it’s there, no, not to the extent we’re assured.and then some more. But fortunately, Trump put Elon Musk on the case to root out $2 trillion waste. Of course, that $2T got trimmed down as time went on.
A new report shows how the government handles inefficiency better than Elon Musk
Senate Democrats have released a report showing how inspectors general most likely outperform Elon Musk when it comes to saving money.
The Senate Democrats' report crunched the numbers and found that the 19 fired IGs had identified and recommended $175 billion in potential savings through audits, investigations and efficiency proposals. That’s $5 billion more than Musk’s estimate after months of chaotic hacking away at the administrative state. (While the offices of inspectors general still exist, the firings of the IGs had a demoralizing and chilling effect on the offices, according to the report, and the main duties of rooting out waste, fraud and corruption appear to have been given to Musk.)
Granted, the report’s calculation of the IGs’ potential savings wouldn’t necessarily end up hitting its topline number. But the source of its estimates for cost-cutting is far more reliable than Musk’s estimates.
[IGs] have a track record of rooting out waste — in fiscal year 2024, all IGs in the federal government had "over $71 billion in combined monetary impact" through their efficiency initiatives, audits and investigations, according to the Democrats’ report. These efforts include things like questioning unnecessary spending, finding and cracking down on illegal federal contracts, sniffing out public officials inappropriately using money and tracking down actors trying to defraud the government through illicit procurement schemes.