• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Waste, Fraud and Abuse Exposed in U.S. Government Expenditures

Hans Blaster

Reconstruction 3 will come
Mar 11, 2017
26,305
18,894
56
USA
✟492,823.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Democrat
Note that this was all rooted out well before DOGE.
Been under investigation for 4 years. 70 people charged with federal crimes. What would "DOGE" do? Stop payment at Treasury?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟785,060.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Upvote 0

Trogdor the Burninator

Senior Veteran
Oct 19, 2004
6,497
3,246
✟329,409.00
Faith
Christian
Ah, a 'what if' question; how original.
Hmmmm, a project/office run by a volunteer designed to cut billions/trillions in wasteful, useless spending and that is the best you can do?
I don't think I am going to lose any sleep over that question.

It's an entirely fair question given an office tasked with making government more efficient should be efficiently run. And this wasn't some 19 year old intern, this was the chief spokesperson for the entire agency.

But as expected, Trump supporters can't see the hypocrisy, can't see the issue with a senior government employee posting to social media on government time, using government resources, and instead yet again offer "the explanation".
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

BPPLEE

Well-Known Member
Apr 13, 2022
17,733
7,860
62
Montgomery
✟307,662.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
It's an entirely fair question given an office tasked with making government more efficient should be efficiently run. And this wasn't some 19 year old intern, this was the chief spokesperson for the entire agency.

But as expected, Trump supporters can't see the hypocrisy, can't see the issue with a senior government employee posting to social media on government time, using government resources, and instead yet again offer "the explanation".
She’s from the Office of Personnel Management, not DOGE, according to your source.
Maybe she’s been tasked with defending DOGE cuts but is she a DOGE employee?
Either way she should be reprimanded
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟785,060.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
It's an entirely fair question given an office tasked with making government more efficient should be efficiently run. And this wasn't some 19 year old intern, this was the chief spokesperson for the entire agency.

But as expected, Trump supporters can't see the hypocrisy, can't see the issue with a senior government employee posting to social media on government time, using government resources, and instead yet again offer "the explanation".
And 'what if' you are wrong and this is very successful? Are you going to stand up and and write 'mea culpa' in this forum?
 
Upvote 0

Trogdor the Burninator

Senior Veteran
Oct 19, 2004
6,497
3,246
✟329,409.00
Faith
Christian
And 'what if' you are wrong and this is very successful? Are you going to stand up and and write 'mea culpa' in this forum?

A mea culpa for what? A Trump appointed official misusing government resources for personal profit? I thought this whole campaign was about waste? Has she written her 5-points email to justify her job yet?
 
  • Like
Reactions: iluvatar5150
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟785,060.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
A Trump appointed official misusing government resources for personal profit?
A mea culpa for what? A Trump appointed official misusing government resources for personal profit? I thought this whole campaign was about waste? Has she written her 5-points email to justify her job yet?
SHE? Who the heck are to talking about? This thread is about DOGE ferreting out waste, fraud and abuse and Elon Musk overseeing it. You are on the wrong thread....or simply trying to derail it since you can't make a sensible point.
 
Upvote 0

Trogdor the Burninator

Senior Veteran
Oct 19, 2004
6,497
3,246
✟329,409.00
Faith
Christian
SHE? Who the heck are to talking about? This thread is about DOGE ferreting out waste, fraud and abuse and Elon Musk overseeing it. You are on the wrong thread....or simply trying to derail it since you can't make a sensible point.

Your thread is titled "Waste, Fraud and Abuse Exposed in U.S. Government Expenditures".

You further state on your own post at the top of the thread that "....only posts that offer credible evidence to support or refute the subject of Waste, Fraud and Abuse of gov. expenditures and ways to combat it."

I'm talking about a case of (at least) waste and abuse. I have offered evidence of same. Therefore my post fits your thread topic.

And if you can't work out who I'm referring to when I say "she" then I suggest a re-read of my post.
 
Upvote 0

civilwarbuff

Constitutionalist
Site Supporter
May 28, 2015
15,883
7,533
Columbus
✟785,060.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Constitution
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
31,805
31,362
Baltimore
✟982,293.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
The biggest chunk of that was the HR system, about which this article has a little more detail:

It doesn’t sound to me like canceling this now would save $280 million- it sounds to me like it’s already been spent. Also, $36 million and one year sounds like a very, very small budget to develop an HR system that can handle the entire DOD and then migrate all of the data over, and maintain the system. Prices I see for ADP with similar capabilities are around $40/employee/month, which is at least 10x what Hegseth’s DHCRMS contract cost. I’d be interested to know what the contracts actually covered.

It may very well be that this platform is doomed to failure and ought to be scrapped, but it also may be that it’s close to ready (which their newsletters suggest) and that it’s actually cheaper to finish than to start over. There’s no guarantee at all this move will save any money.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Hans Blaster
Upvote 0