• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Supreme Court declines to hear challenge to abortion 'bubble zone' law as city quietly repeals it

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
190,586
70,597
Woods
✟6,592,510.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The United States Supreme Court has declined to hear a case that could have led to the reversal of a decades-old decision upholding “bubble zones” outside abortion clinics as the city at the center of the case quietly repealed its ordinance.

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court declined to hear a challenge to a law implemented by the city of Carbondale, Illinois, prohibiting pro-life protesters from sharing their message within 100 feet of abortion clinics. Coalition Life, a group of pro-life sidewalk counselors, sought relief from the U.S. Supreme Court.

While the justices declined to hear the case, Justices Samuel Alito and Clarence Thomas indicated that they would have granted Coalition Life’s request for judicial review. Thomas penned a lengthy dissentexplaining why he disagreed with the decision not to hear the case, which he viewed as an opportunity to reverse the 2000 Hill v. Colorado decision that upheld a similar ordinance placing limits on pro-life protesters.

Continued below.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: RileyG