Greetings soldier of light. I hope you are warm and fed today. The blessings of God abound.
I must admit, I'm not clear on your intentions with this post. It seems as if you mix two issues. First, an issue of law vs grace and Pharisee-ism (I'm not interested in this topic at this time). And second, the issue of debate, public discourse, or iron sharpening iron ("one man sharpens another" (Prov 27:17).
In the above quote of you, you say "debate is messy". I agree with this, particularly depending upon who you debate, the topic of that debate, and if each person comes as teacher
and learner (vessel and humbled).
However, you then write ....
Debate is contrary to the spirit
Within your post you frame the word "debate" as being discourse between two individuals. You then present that discourse as negative and then claim the "debate itself" is contrary to the spirit.
There is no debate in the mind of Christ. Christ isn't divided.
Your proof that public discourse is "contrary to the spirit" is to try and equate the word "debate" with some form of inconsistency within Christ. However, it is clear the two are not related.
1. Public discorse (debate)
2. Consistency of the mind of Christ
The internal consistency of Christ is not reason for not having public discourse (i.e., debate). Although I agree that "Christ isn't divided", that is, He is internally consistent. The very fact that we as human beings tend to be internally inconsistent in thought, is the very reason there should be debate.
I agree that there is only one truth, that is the wisdom of God. I just disagree that I , you or anyone, hold 100% of it. If you think you hold 100% truth in all things you think theologically, then this is where our dispute originates. Debate is needed to flush out my, and your, errors.
As an edit, I saw another one of your posts. It seems to speak to what I have said here. And appears to demonstrate we agree on the debate issue.
Peace and love to you, brother
keep seeking God's wisdom as if it were hidden treasure.