• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Parents vs. Porn: Supreme Court Hears Challenge to Texas Age-Verification Law

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
190,201
70,379
Woods
✟6,558,181.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
A major legal battle pits the porn industry’s financial interests against state efforts to protect children.

Not that long ago, I attended a small gathering where a diocesan representative spoke about child protection efforts.

“Your child doesn’t have to be looking for porn. Porn is looking for your child,” he told the speechless audience of parents with school-age children. Fortunately, a growing number of states have passed age-verification laws to shield under-age eyes.

On Wednesday morning, the U.S. Supreme Court heard a two-hour oral argument in Free Speech Coalition v. Paxton, the porn industry’s objection to Texas’ age-verification law.

Don’t let the name of the petitioners’ group confuse you. This case has little to do with free speech and everything to do with money. The Free Speech Coalition is a trade group representing the $100-billion “adult entertainment industry.” The group claims the law violates the First Amendment’s free-speech guarantee for adults by discouraging access to pornographic content.

Continued below.
 
  • Prayers
Reactions: Vambram

Ignatius the Kiwi

Dissident
Mar 2, 2013
9,065
4,720
✟360,179.00
Country
New Zealand
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
What annoys me more is the Christians who defend the free speech of pornographers. The first step in mitigating the vile influence of porn is to put restrictions on it and hamper it's access, especially to children. I hate how porn affected me and millions of other men growing up.
 
Upvote 0

JimR-OCDS

God Cannot Be Grasped, Except Through Love
Oct 28, 2008
19,902
4,351
The Kingdom of Heaven
Visit site
✟282,502.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
They should've made a law that porn sites have URLs with .XXX in their address.
This would allow parents to easily prohibit their children from accessing these
XXX sites.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Red Team - Moderator
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
42,595
23,290
30
Nebraska
✟1,031,889.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
What annoys me more is the Christians who defend the free speech of pornographers. The first step in mitigating the vile influence of porn is to put restrictions on it and hamper it's access, especially to children. I hate how porn affected me and millions of other men growing up.
Amen!
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0