It would be uninformed and baseless if I were the only one that held it...but I am not...not even close lol!
If two people believe something that's uninformed and baseless, it's still uninformed and baseless if a million people believe it. If an opinion isn't based on actual facts or knowledge, then it's baseless...no matter how many people believe it.
So the majority opinion (since Trump DID win and we can assume that was a factor) is that she did in fact hide his mental deficiencies from the public.
No, the majority opinion of American voters is that they chose Donald Trump to be President. Any conclusions about why they decided to vote for him would be based on nothing more than assumptions and speculation.
Similarly, regarding President Biden's mental state, as far as I know, none of us on this board have any direct contact with the President, sufficient to judge his mental state (even if we were qualified neurologists with experience in that area). Any conclusions about his mental state would also be based on nothing but assumptions and speculation.
In other words, nothing. Baseless. Personally, I prefer facts.
Here's one fact we do know: the 25th Amendment of the Constitution, section 4 states:
Whenever the Vice President and a majority of either the principal officers of the executive departments or of such other body as Congress may by law provide, transmit to the President pro tempore of the Senate and the Speaker of the House of Representatives their written declaration that the President is unable to discharge the powers and duties of his office, the Vice President shall immediately assume the powers and duties of the office as Acting President.
One other fact we know: neither Vice President Harris nor a majority of principal officers have done this.
Now, as to
why this has not happened, we can only assume and speculate. You choose to assume Harris knows the President is unable to discharge his duties as President, but has lied and chosen not to fulfill her constitutional duty. One could just as easily assume she does not, in fact, believe the President is unable to discharge his duties as President, which would explain why she hasn't so informed the Speaker and President pro tempore. I'll bet, with a little imagination, one could come up with even more assumptions, if you wanted to.
When you asked if I was okay with Harris lying, you were assuming she did, in fact, lie. I have not made that same assumption. If you want me to accept your assumption as if it were a claim of fact, then you'd have to provide proof that Harris, in fact, lied. That, you haven't done.
That was my point...but you already knew that.
I'm fully aware of what your point was. Have you seen mine yet?
-- A2SG, I've tried my best to explain it.....