• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.
  • We hope the site problems here are now solved, however, if you still have any issues, please start a ticket in Contact Us

Kamala Harris rejects religious exemptions for abortion laws: ‘That cannot be negotiable’

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
187,161
69,321
Woods
✟6,295,919.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Vice President Kamala Harris confirmed that she would oppose religious exemptions in abortion laws if elected president and emphasized that she would not make concessions to Republicans on the issue.

The Democratic nominee made the comments in a Tuesday interview when NBC News’ Hallie Jackson asked Harris “what concessions would be on the table” when considering federal laws on abortion and specifically whether she would consider “religious exemptions.”

“I don’t think we should be making concessions when we’re talking about a fundamental freedom to make decisions about your own body,” Harris responded.

Continued below.
 

stevevw

inquisitive
Nov 4, 2013
17,757
2,122
Brisbane Qld Australia
✟345,494.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
I was watching Michelle Obama at Kamals's rally speaking about abortion rights. She was saying women must make the men in their lives, their husbands, fathers and sons stand with Harris and not with Trump. To forget all about the economics ruin, the immigration chaos and the abuse of power and make killing babies a priority.

Kamala will fight to restore womens reproductive freedoms, defend our health and fight for life saving emergency care. Since when has abortion been "life saving emergency care". Kamala will fight to expand birth control and abortion pills and she will do all of this not because she is a women but because she is a decent human being.

As Knowles says "Harris is fighting to let women kill any kid they want because she is a decent human being". He says Obama's speech is similar to Harris and appealing to dark and shameful passions.

How do we know its appealing to dark and shameful desires. Because she has to use all these euphemisms to describe it. Such as "life saving medical care". Abortion doesn't save a life, it actually ends life. Or women need access to maternal care. Abortion is the opposite of maternal care. Abortion denies being a mother and seeks to end the responsibilities of motherhood. The exact opposite of maternal care.

But Obama gives up the game towards the end of her speech when she mentions the rights to abortion pills. Dems never use to mention abortion pills. This sanitised language hides the reality of what is gong on.

But you can see it in their faces, I notice when Dems like Waltz, Harris, Dr. Sarah Traxler and Obama talk about killing babies they are never smiling and joyful. I think they know but deeply surpress this to conform to the ideology which has no rationality.

Another point I noticed with the arguements for abortion is that they always appeal to "life saving care" like if you don't allow it you are then responsible for denying life saving care and contributing to ending womens lives.

Now where have I heard that before. Oh thats right. This is the same emotional blackmail Trans activists use against parents. If you don't affirm your childs right to transition then your will be responsible if they commit suicide. Its the same irrational arguements because it comes from the same ideology.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

RDKirk

Alien, Pilgrim, and Sojourner
Site Supporter
Mar 3, 2013
43,147
23,924
US
✟1,827,008.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
There are exceptional cases in which an abortion is necessary to save the woman's life, but as I've said before: Public policy should be based on the average situation, not the exceptional situation. Exceptions to public policy can be made for exceptional situations.
 
Upvote 0