• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Causes of Southern Secession in the American Civil war

Tolkien R.R.J

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2018
1,100
321
42
Virginia
✟112,809.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The second article in a series about the Civil War has been published in History Is Now Magazine. This article explores a topic that historians have largely ignored: the reasons for the secession of the Upper South. It's an excellent read for anyone interested in gaining insight and access to original sources to challenge the misconception that secession was about slavery.


The first dealt with Abraham Lincolns white supremacists views

In my book Defending Dixie's Land, I argue that the Southern states seceded for multiple reasons, with slavery being just one of them and not the primary cause. Slavery was a cause for the Cotton States (not the Upper South) but had more to do with state rights than the preservation of human bondage. My latest article addresses this subject.

Was the U.S. Civil War Fought for Slavery or States’ Rights? — History is Now Magazine, Podcasts, Blog and Books | Modern International and American history

My latest article in History Now Magazine briefly examines the Confederate Constitution's divergence from the original U.S. Constitution, which leaned towards more libertarian, decentralized, and conservative principles.

 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: jas3

Tolkien R.R.J

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2018
1,100
321
42
Virginia
✟112,809.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
In my book Defending Dixie's Land, I argue that the Southern states seceded for multiple reasons, with slavery being just one of them and not the primary cause. Slavery was a cause for the Cotton States (not the Upper South) but had more to do with state rights than the preservation of human bondage. My latest article addresses this subject.

Was the U.S. Civil War Fought for Slavery or States’ Rights? — History is Now Magazine, Podcasts, Blog and Books | Modern International and American history
 
Upvote 0

jas3

Well-Known Member
Jan 21, 2023
1,345
967
The South
✟108,443.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Excellent article. It's a shame that most people today uncritically accept what is little more than propaganda; the documents of the time clearly show that the Union prior to the Civil War was seen as a voluntary association of states, and secession was understood to be an option for any state. That was part of the motivation for institutions like the electoral college and the Senate; if things were run on a pure popular vote and the small states' interests were trampled by the large states, the small states could in theory just leave or refuse to join in the first place.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Tolkien R.R.J
Upvote 0

Tolkien R.R.J

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2018
1,100
321
42
Virginia
✟112,809.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Excellent article. It's a shame that most people today uncritically accept what is little more than propaganda; the documents of the time clearly show that the Union prior to the Civil War was seen as a voluntary association of states, and secession was understood to be an option for any state. That was part of the motivation for institutions like the electoral college and the Senate; if things were run on a pure popular vote and the small states' interests were trampled by the large states, the small states could in theory just leave or refuse to join in the first place.

Right, democracy was despised by North and the South, until mid to late 1850's. We are a Republic! Article 4 section 4, or we were before the Civil war.
 
Upvote 0

Tolkien R.R.J

Well-Known Member
Jul 23, 2018
1,100
321
42
Virginia
✟112,809.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
My latest article in History Now Magazine briefly examines the Confederate Constitution's divergence from the original U.S. Constitution, which leaned towards more libertarian, decentralized, and conservative principles.

 
Upvote 0