Gen-Z Men Turning Toward Trump, While Gen-Z Women Turning Toward Harris

In the Harris-Trump choice, Gen-Z men are favorable to Trump (+13%)
while Gen-Z women are favorable to Harris (+38%).

The questions that Christians should ask are...

1 Why have the younger American genertions so heavily disengaged
from political involvement?

2 Is the male-female candidate choices for president, made worse by
sharply feminist female candidates (like Hillary Clinton)?

3 Is the male-female Gen Z split because of simple competency choices, or
does it involve other deeper biases and rhetoric in America?

NOTE: Those who are going to college are now 60% female, and 40% male.
American men seem to have less hope in an educated future, than young
American women. This is a disaster.

I would say that this is a direct result of a biased "women-have-more-
potential-than-men" feminism, that itself projects an awful bias.

NOTE: There are statistics that in the "soft" high tech market (such as
healthcare jobs), 70% of these are going to woman, and only about 30%
are going to men. This is a disaster for young men.

I would (again) say that this is a direct result of a biased "women-have-more-
potential-than-men" feminism, that itself projects an awful bias.


When Americans make choices that are more weighted on sex, than on
competency, then an awful bias is injected into the economy. I think that
THIS is a better explanation for the radical decision split among Gen-Zers,
than other political theories.

I think that historically, when female political candidates have pushed a
strident, in-your-face feminism (such as Hillary Clinton did), they drive
men to whatever the apposing political option is available.

The answer in America is NOT to redefine "diversity" as not(white-male),
which is the path that Barack Obama took, but rather, to properly
define diversity as competency and creativity (cut free of strident
feminism, or the strident promotion of everything that is not(white-male)).

America does not need more fluctuating biases, to overcome wrong biases
that have existed in the past. America needs open opportunity, that is NOT
presented as new and "corrective" biases.


There is an ongoing disaster unfolding among young American men, as
many of them see no good future for themselves, as they do not fit
into the most popular "favored" groups in American society.

I think that Hillary Clinton was NOT elected president, because her
strident feminism mocked unfairly, many American men. This loss
was not an artifact of American male chauvinism. And, Hillary openly
mocked religious conservatives. This drove them to vote for Trump.

I am hoping that Kamala Harris will ditch the "in-your-face" feminism of
Hillary Clinton, and will INSTEAD appeal to the Moderate Middle of
American voters, without appealing to the angry and offensive aspects
of some of American feminism.

We don't need damaging sexism perpetuated in America. It has already
done a lot of damage to the future of Gen-Z men.

By the way,

I think that North American Christians have started or amplified
types of myths, that have damaged generations of young Christians,
starting with the Millenials.

Christian leaders have not had the courage (generally, to assert a
broad generalization), to present life as an experience in which we
should NOT embrace "entitlement". There was huge economic
opportunity (in America) after WW II, and Christian leaders should
have had the vision to warn the Millenials that this would NOT ALWAYS
be the case, in America. That is, Christian leaders often repeated or
tolerated the "entitlement" philosophy of the Millenials.

The entitlement beliefs of the Millenials, and the toughening economy
due to high tech development, mean that many Millenials did not gain
the economic milestones such as getting a college education or owning
a house) that their parents did.

Christian leaders should have seriously doubted the rosy promises
of "making the Internet available to all", as a solution to everything.

The X-Y-Z generations grew up in a fake electronic environment,
lost language skills, ditched formal logic, created their own
entertainment world, and seemingly lost all interest in the core
philosophical questions that earlier generations at least nominally
thought were important. And the INACTION of Christian leaders
normalized this fake online "community" as reality, even though
there is no one online community. Again, Christian leaders lacked
the vision to see that they were no longer teaching Christian children
what our shared reality, really is.
---------- ----------

The problem is that orthodox Christianity, and the Bible specifically,
presents a view of our shared reality that the younger electronic screen
generations no longer accept. In many cases, they do not accept that
there is any global truth. And this basic worldview, is incompatible
with Christianity.

The resulting logically incoherent worldviews, seem to be very different
for young men, than for young women. It is politically correct for young
men to think that males are responsible for everything that is evil in the
world, and females are the people who have potential, and are creative, and
ought to be successful at anything they want to do.
---------- ----------

In all this, Christian leaders have been mostly blind to what is happening
in America, and how orthodox Christianity has answers to all these
dysfunctional views of life and values.

This failure by Christian leaders is not benign. It fosters male radicalization,
and the continuing (often false) claim by women that they are being
abused, and are entitled to biased favoritism.

We are only seeing the beginning of what results from Christian leaders,
who do not have the backbone to teach philosophical primitives, and
godly styles of life, regardless of whether this biblical teaching is popular,
or not.