Trump tells Christians their 'religion will be in tatters' if Biden wins: 'We answer to God in Heaven'

rturner76 said:

You have not posted any proves data that Sweden bases their laws on one particular religious belief. It would be edifying for me to read that Sweden's laws are based on religion like Sharia, please share.

Well, we have a democratically elected constitutional republic. Even though the Senate refused to confirm any of President Obama's judicial picks in the last full year of his presidency, Trump's picks were confirmed in the first 90 days of his presidency. That fact does illustrate how certain political groups can hijack the government. If Obama had been allowed to do his job, we would have had more adherants to the constitution in the Supreme Court. Since he wasn't allowed to appoint judges who followed the constitution, Trup was freed to appoint activist judges who put their religion over the letter of the rights laid out in the constitution.

Nothing can be done about that now but we can learn the lesson the Conservatives are more concerned with wielding power than protecting American citizens constitutional rights. The Supreme Court is running wild right now placing religion in front of rights but history will bear that out.

Click to expand...

rturner76 said:

It means that I would rather a law be passed based on a majority rule than set up the minority to be allowed to change laws based on a minority opinion that the democratic majority opinion. If you still don't understand, that means that the majority rules, not the self-righteous minority. even if we agree on the minority's opinion on abortion or other laws, in fact it is the majority that rules a democracy. Do you disagree with the basic rules of democracy?

Click to expand...

rturner76 said:

So you don't have any evidence that the majority of Swedes wish for Sharia law.

Click to expand...

rturner76 said:

……

Click to expand...

RileyG said:

It’s not just about the woman though, it affects a whole host of people. No one has the right to end the life of another because they are inconvenient or unwanted.

Click to expand...