• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Donald Trump calls for elimination of tax on Social Security

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,122
6,312
Minnesota
✟351,232.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
One avenue Trump has floated to compensate for those reductions is to ramp up tariffs.
He’s dangled a 10% across-the-board tariff on foreign imports broadly and suggested 60% tariffs (or even higher) on imports from China.

A lot of people worked hard and were already taxed, and now the government taxes them again on Social Security. Why should they have to pay taxes again, takes that go for the student loan payoffs or the various woke programs and EV promotions and "equity" training and benefits for illegals?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
24,394
16,714
72
Bondi
✟397,217.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
One avenue Trump has floated to compensate for those reductions is to ramp up tariffs.
He’s dangled a 10% across-the-board tariff on foreign imports broadly and suggested 60% tariffs (or even higher) on imports from China.

A lot of people worked hard and were already taxed, and now the government taxes them again on Social Security. Why should they have to pay taxes again, takes that go for the student loan payoffs or the various woke programs and EV promotions and "equity" training and benefits for illegals?
Isn't social security means tested? In Australia you only get it if you don't have funds on which to live. It's certainly not enough to live on so there's constant encouragement to make your own arrangements for superannuation (like your 401k?).
 
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
6,251
3,438
67
Denver CO
✟253,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Isn't social security means tested? In Australia you only get it if you don't have funds on which to live. It's certainly not enough to live on so there's constant encouragement to make your own arrangements for superannuation (like your 401k?).
We have many people who collect social security who don't even need it. So, it is taxed if you have other income, but not taxed, if you don't.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
24,394
16,714
72
Bondi
✟397,217.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
We have many people who collect social security who don't even need it. So, it is taxed if you have other income, but not taxed, if you don't.
I don't agree with those who are well off having it in the first place. Are you saying that if you have a few million in the bank then you can claim it?

I don't know the details, but if that's the case, then taxing it goes some way to redress that situation.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

childeye 2

Well-Known Member
Aug 18, 2018
6,251
3,438
67
Denver CO
✟253,252.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't agree with those who are well off having it in the first place. Are you saying that if you have a few million in the bank then you can claim it?
I hear you. But basically, yes you can claim it if you've paid enough into it. It's always been a system meant to keep people out of poverty. To maintain a solvent system, the government began taxing it otherwise they would have to cut benefits. Some people didn't like that because they say it gets taxed twice. But it's been a reliable lifeline that many people can depend on because of the taxation.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,823
21,789
✟1,806,867.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I don't agree with those who are well off having it in the first place. Are you saying that if you have a few million in the bank then you can claim it?

Yes. As long as one pays Social Secuirty tax for 10 years (payroll dedecutions), one can claim beneifts regardless of one's wealth at retirement age. The benefit is capped at $3,600 / month.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,823
21,789
✟1,806,867.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
24,394
16,714
72
Bondi
✟397,217.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I hear you. But basically, yes you can claim it if you've paid enough into it. It's always been a system meant to keep people out of poverty. To maintain a solvent system, the government began taxing it otherwise they would have to cut benefits. Some people didn't like that because they say it gets taxed twice.
I get the 'taxed twice' argument. There was talk down here about taxing the value of your home when you die when it's passed on to your children. Say what? We bought the thing and paid the mortgage, which was up to 17% at one point in the early days, we stretched ourselves to the limit and we paid for the extension all with our earnings, which had already been taxed. And they want to tax the house again? No way.

That said, I don't agree that people who don't need social security should receive it. I'd vote against anyone who suggested that people like myself should have it. It should go to people who are doing it tough. So IF you're going to give it to people who already have a chunk of money in the bank, or in shares then tax it.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,122
6,312
Minnesota
✟351,232.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Imagine the inflationary impact of such tarriffs on people who are dependent on Social Security.
Seniors who are currently being taxed on their Social Security will have more money in their pockets to spend. Trade wars are difficult. Joe Biden kept the Trump tariffs on, and increased those on the total Chinese EV package. For now it is a negotiation point for Trump, he has experience as a business negotiator.
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
24,394
16,714
72
Bondi
✟397,217.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
For now it is a negotiation point for Trump, he has experience as a business negotiator.
Yeah, he had so many successful businesses. Shall we investigate?

Trump Uni.
Trump Vodka
Trump Airlines
Trump Steak
Trump Mortgages
Trump Ice
Trump Magazine
Trump Taj Mahal
Trump Marina
Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino

Notice they all have one thing in common? Apart from the fact that they all went under?
 
Upvote 0

Valletta

Well-Known Member
Oct 10, 2020
13,122
6,312
Minnesota
✟351,232.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Yeah, he had so many successful businesses. Shall we investigate?

Trump Uni.
Trump Vodka
Trump Airlines
Trump Steak
Trump Mortgages
Trump Ice
Trump Magazine
Trump Taj Mahal
Trump Marina
Trump Plaza Hotel and Casino

Notice they all have one thing in common? Apart from the fact that they all went under?
That business. His Trump Tower was quite a success. My point is that typically American foreign negotiators give away way more than is needed just so they can say they made a deal. A true negotiator, like Trump, is willing to walk away from a deal.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Maria Billingsley

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Oct 7, 2018
11,602
9,636
65
Martinez
✟1,197,744.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
One avenue Trump has floated to compensate for those reductions is to ramp up tariffs.
He’s dangled a 10% across-the-board tariff on foreign imports broadly and suggested 60% tariffs (or even higher) on imports from China.

A lot of people worked hard and were already taxed, and now the government taxes them again on Social Security. Why should they have to pay taxes again, takes that go for the student loan payoffs or the various woke programs and EV promotions and "equity" training and benefits for illegals?
Correction: Social Security collected during employment are pre tax dollars so no tax on it in fact, it lowers income so that potentially one may be in a lower tax bracket.
Correction: It is widely known that tariffs hurt the consumer and contributes to inflation. These fees are passed on to the end user. China feels nothing.

His " ideas" are not wise.
 
Upvote 0

durangodawood

re Member
Aug 28, 2007
28,329
19,957
Colorado
✟557,557.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Seeker
Marital Status
Single
One avenue Trump has floated to compensate for those reductions is to ramp up tariffs.
He’s dangled a 10% across-the-board tariff on foreign imports broadly and suggested 60% tariffs (or even higher) on imports from China.

A lot of people worked hard and were already taxed, and now the government taxes them again on Social Security. Why should they have to pay taxes again, takes that go for the student loan payoffs or the various woke programs and EV promotions and "equity" training and benefits for illegals?
Not sure if the tax benefit would offset the huge additional inflation.
 
Upvote 0

bèlla

❤️
Site Supporter
Jan 16, 2019
23,325
19,417
USA
✟1,133,676.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
In Relationship
I don't agree with those who are well off having it in the first place. Are you saying that if you have a few million in the bank then you can claim it?

A percentage is removed from earnings every pay period. We aren't given the option of non participation. Younger voters want to remove mandatory contributions or allow us to manage them. Either are preferable to me.

~bella
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Vambram
Upvote 0

Laodicean60

Well-Known Member
Jul 2, 2023
5,114
2,471
65
NM
✟107,561.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Correction: Social Security collected during employment are pre tax dollars so no tax on it in fact, it lowers income so that potentially one may be in a lower tax bracket.
Correction: It is widely known that tariffs hurt the consumer and contributes to inflation. These fees are passed on to the end user. China feels nothing.

His " ideas" are not wise.
I agree, I believe as you do about tariffs. Nothing is mentioned about trade wars, countries can easily impose tariffs on us and we are dependent on China's natural resources—the ignorance of our politicians.

He's probably listening to these guys:
 
Upvote 0

comana

Senior Veteran
Site Supporter
Jan 19, 2005
8,042
4,623
Colorado
✟1,174,803.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The maximum combined total income allowed before Social Security is taxed needs to be raised.

  • File a federal tax return as an "individual" and your combined income*is
    • Between $25,000 and $34,000, you may have to pay income tax on up to 50% of your benefits.
    • More than $34,000, up to 85% of your benefits may be taxable.
  • File a joint return, and you and your spouse have a combined income*that is
    • Between $32,000 and $44,000, you may have to pay income tax on up to 50% of your benefits.
    • More than $44,000, up to 85% of your benefits may be taxable.

IMO , A combined total income of 44k for a couple is way too low as the threshold to start taxing SS income. Also to note, Congress last adjusted the income levels in 1993 when these maximums were much more reasonable.
 
Upvote 0

wing2000

E pluribus unum
Site Supporter
Aug 18, 2012
25,823
21,789
✟1,806,867.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Seniors who are currently being taxed on their Social Security will have more money in their pockets to spend. Trade wars are difficult. Joe Biden kept the Trump tariffs on, and increased those on the total Chinese EV package. For now it is a negotiation point for Trump, he has experience as a business negotiator.

Targeted tarrffs are one thing.
10% tarriff across the board is quite another. Our trading partners will certainly reciprocate, leading to higher prices on imported goods from Mexico, Canada, ....the globe.

And let's say he backs off the 60% tariff on goods from China and settles for 30%. Do you have any idea what that would do to prices at your local Walmart? Do you really think the Walton family is going to absorb the increase cost of goods from China? I'm not opposed to removing the tax from Social Security earnings. However, any savings for Social Security recipients will be consumed in higher prices for imported goods.
 
Upvote 0