• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

ATF ID'd Buyer of Crooks' Gun in 30 Minutes; Process Usually Takes 8 Days

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,298
17,065
Here
✟1,472,567.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
I think the more usual version of that argument is that criminals could hack the database to find out which households didn't have a gun so it would be safe to attack.

But it would be interesting to look at burglary statistics for NYC to see if there was an uptick in burglaries of home protection handguns after the data leak.
There would probably be too many confounding factors at play making isolation of that one aspect nearly impossible.

There's been so much going on (in terms of outliers) from 2019 until now that it'd be very difficult to do that data exercise with any accuracy.

For what its worth, the Poynter Institute (a journalism school and the parent organization that actually owns and operates PolitiFact and a few other smaller publications like the Tampa Bay Times), was very critical of the move when it happened.

The Poynter Institute, a school for journalists, notes that some other news agencies have published various types of databases as well.

“Publishing gun owners’ names makes them targets for theft or public ridicule. It is journalistic arrogance to abuse public record privilege, just as it is to air 911 calls for no reason or to publish the home addresses of police or judges without cause,” Al Tompkins, a Poynter senior faculty member, said in a statement Wednesday. “Unwarranted publishing of the names of permitted owners just encourages gun owners to skip the permitting.”
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
29,607
29,328
Baltimore
✟770,442.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
I think the reasons that make people slightly uneasy about an easily searchable database aren't confined to just the conspiratorial ideas about "the gubmint tyranny!!".

I think people also have concerns about what happens if that data somehow fell into the wrong hands via a leak or a hack, or got released by a newspaper (like what happened in NY where they have a registry, and a local news publication used a FOIA request to obtain that information, and then published an article with an interactive map called "The Gun Owner Next door" where you could basically scroll around neighborhoods and see which houses have firearms which creates a couple of legitimate concerns for the gun owners themselves both in the form of political backlash, and in the form of their house become a bigger target for robbery when they're not home)
This seems like a pretty easy technical legal fix - just make the database not subject to such requests. Restrict access to law enforcement and other government entities, and to individuals looking up their own information.
 
Upvote 0

BCP1928

Well-Known Member
Jan 30, 2024
8,917
4,515
82
Goldsboro NC
✟265,972.00
Country
United States
Faith
Other Religion
Marital Status
Married
This seems like a pretty easy technical legal fix - just make the database not subject to such requests. Restrict access to law enforcement and other government entities, and to individuals looking up their own information.
With a warrant to find the owner of a gun taken up by the police. Period. but I think the fear is that criminals would hack the database.
 
Upvote 0

ThatRobGuy

Part of the IT crowd
Site Supporter
Sep 4, 2005
28,298
17,065
Here
✟1,472,567.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
This seems like a pretty easy technical legal fix - just make the database not subject to such requests. Restrict access to law enforcement and other government entities, and to individuals looking up their own information.
That closes up the loophole of that one scenario like the newspaper using a FOIA request to get it and build an interactive map to publish.

Although, it doesn't necessarily solve the issues of hack or other technical failures...like for instance (hypothetically) if their system is on Windows, and a company...let's call them Crowdstrike... pushes a botched update that disrupts the system.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Pommer
Upvote 0