• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

U.S. bishops: Supreme Court ruling ‘criminalizes homelessness’

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
184,351
67,372
Woods
✟6,064,508.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The U.S. bishops strongly condemned the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling in a pivotal homelessness case, calling the court’s decision “a direct contradiction of our call to shelter those experiencing homelessness and care for those in need.”

In the 6-3 decision, issued in City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Gloria Johnson, the court ruled that cities can arrest or fine homeless individuals for camping in public spaces.

Writing on behalf of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Archbishop Borys Gudziak, head of the bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, said that “ticketing and arresting people for it [being homeless] is a counterproductive approach to the problem of homelessness” and that “criminalizing homeless is not the response to caring for those in need.”

Did the Supreme Court criminalize being homeless?​



Continued below.
 

Offline4Better.

Christian
Site Supporter
Aug 11, 2023
11,384
7,707
✟668,648.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The U.S. bishops strongly condemned the Supreme Court’s Friday ruling in a pivotal homelessness case, calling the court’s decision “a direct contradiction of our call to shelter those experiencing homelessness and care for those in need.”

In the 6-3 decision, issued in City of Grants Pass, Oregon v. Gloria Johnson, the court ruled that cities can arrest or fine homeless individuals for camping in public spaces.

Writing on behalf of the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, Archbishop Borys Gudziak, head of the bishops’ Committee on Domestic Justice and Human Development, said that “ticketing and arresting people for it [being homeless] is a counterproductive approach to the problem of homelessness” and that “criminalizing homeless is not the response to caring for those in need.”

Did the Supreme Court criminalize being homeless?​



Continued below.
The supreme court is no longer a trustworthy or ethical bastion of the United States, and has not been since the early 2020s. The Europeans know how to handle this issue, yet America will never learn.

This is end times stuff, and for all you preterists who think Revelation happened in 70 AD, go read Matthew 24:21 (NIV): "For then there will be great distress, unequaled from the beginning of the world until now—and never to be equaled again."
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
184,351
67,372
Woods
✟6,064,508.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
By now everyone has heard that the Supreme Court upheld a town’s power to ban “camping” in public places like parks and sidewalks. Dissenting, Justice Sotomayor wrote “Sleep is a biological necessity, not a crime.” Well, elimination is a biological necessity too. If there is no toilet nearby, would Justice Sotomayor say I have a constitutional right to defecate on the street?

In America there are several main reasons for long-term homelessness. One is deinstitutionalization of people who need residential mental care. Another is drug addiction. And some people, believe it or not, simply prefer living on the street. Of course shelters should be provided, but even when they are, quite a few people refuse to live in them, mainly because they have rules. The street doesn’t.

I would gladly support dealing with these problems. What decent person wouldn’t? But turning public places into sewers doesn’t help anyone. It isn’t a response, but an excuse for no response. The only thing it is good for is giving a hypocritical display of compassion.

Progressivism is a class ideology, and wealthy contempt for ordinary people has no limits. Progressives don’t want strangers sleeping and defecating in their own yards or driveways. The reason they don’t mind letting them do such things in parks and on sidewalks is that these places are used by the little people, people who can’t afford to vacation in nice clean resorts and who have to walk where they want to go.


 
Upvote 0