Red State AG Slaps New York With Lawsuit Over Trump Trial: ‘Unconstitutional Lawfare’

Valletta · Jun 22, 2024

“We have to fight back against a rogue prosecutor who is trying to take a presidential candidate off the campaign trail. It sabotages Missourians’ right to a free and fair election,” the post continued.

Red State AG Slaps New York With Lawsuit Over Trump Trial: ‘Unconstitutional Lawfare’

Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey Announced Friday that his state will be filing a lawsuit against New York over Manhattan District Attorney Alvin

trendingpoliticsnews.com

A free and fair election is at the heart of a democratic process.

Fantine · Jun 22, 2024

This matter could have been tried and adjudicated long before his campaign started were it not for his $100 million dollar legal team pushing delay after delay after delay. That tactic is working in the other three cases still, but if the Supreme Court correctly determines that former presidents do not enjoy immunity from criminal acts that trial could begin as early as September.

In other words, it was the convicted felon's own fault.

rturner76 · Jun 22, 2024

I think it highlights the strong-arm unconstitutional tactics of the Right.

Arcangl86 · Jun 22, 2024

Offhand the only thing that seems unconstitutional is this law suit. States have no right to interfere in the internal running of other states.

Yttrium · Jun 22, 2024

Yeah, this lawsuit is going to get thrown out because Missouri has no standing to challenge a case like this in another state. The AG is just wasting money and court time.

Valletta · Jun 22, 2024

Fantine said:
This matter could have been tried and adjudicated long before his campaign started were it not for his $100 million dollar legal team pushing delay after delay after delay. That tactic is working in the other three cases still, but if the Supreme Court correctly determines that former presidents do not enjoy immunity from criminal acts that trial could begin as early as September.

In other words, it was the convicted felon's own fault.

There was no reason for these trials accept to try and help Joe Biden win. The effort was made to convict Trump not too far before the elections and make sure the appeal decisions, which Trump will win because of the numerous violations of our Constitution by Democrats, will not happen until after the election. There is no question that election interference is taking place by some rogue Democrats who believe they should decide who the next American president will be.

Fantine · Jun 22, 2024

The overwhelming majority of appeals fail. In the few that succeed, the verdict is not overturned but a new trial is ordered.
On the other hand, seeing him tried and convicted a second time would be absolutely delicious.

Pommer · Jun 22, 2024

Arcangl86 said:
Offhand the only thing that seems unconstitutional is this law suit. States have no right to interfere in the internal running of other states.

This will be summarily dismissed, (with prejudice), Missouri has no standing, it suffered no ill, there is no “injury” that can be articulated , let alone litigated.

Pommer · Jun 22, 2024

Fantine said:
The overwhelming majority of appeals fail. In the few that succeed, the verdict is not overturned but a new trial is ordered.
On the other hand, seeing him tried and convicted a second time would be absolutely delicious.

No, it would be another sad day should this eventuality actually happen.

No president is going to be canonized anytime soon, but for the most part part, they were decent and caring men who could hide their flaws a bit better than most.

Oompa Loompa · Jun 24, 2024

Fantine said:
On the other hand, seeing him tried and convicted a second time would be absolutely delicious.

What would the Pope say to that?

Fantine · Jun 24, 2024

Ps 106:3 Blessed are those who uphold justice.

I would rejoice that justice had been done twice.

Oompa Loompa · Jun 27, 2024

Fantine said:
Ps 106:3 Blessed are those who uphold justice.

I would rejoice that justice had been done twice.

At least Trump was actually cognitively fit to stand trial. Unlike someone else.

JustOneWay · Jun 27, 2024

Oompa Loompa said:
At least Trump was actually cognitively fit to stand trial. Unlike someone else.

Was he? He kept nodding off in court, had episodes of flatulence, was disruptive and needed to be verbally gagged for all the angry, vicious, and dangerous rhetoric he spewed at the courts, the witnesses and the jury. There was little cognitive fitness presented by the defendant.

Oompa Loompa · Jun 27, 2024

JustOneWay said:
Was he? He kept nodding off in court, had episodes of flatulence, was disruptive and needed to be verbally gagged for all the angry, vicious, and dangerous rhetoric he spewed at the courts, the witnesses and the jury. There was little cognitive fitness presented by the defendant.

Does this mean the classified documents case and the hush money convictions should be dropped? Seeing how cognitively disabled Trump is.

iluvatar5150 · Jun 27, 2024

Oompa Loompa said:
Does this mean the classified documents case and the hush money convictions should be dropped? Seeing how cognitively disabled Trump is.

If the alternative is him being locked up for his own safety, I'm okay with that trade.

Oompa Loompa · Jun 27, 2024

iluvatar5150 said:
If the alternative is him being locked up for his own safety, I'm okay with that trade.

Are you also suggesting that the 25th ammendment be implemented and Biden being locked up. You know? For his own safety?

JustOneWay · Jun 27, 2024

Oompa Loompa said:
Are you also suggesting that the 25th ammendment be implemented and Biden being locked up. You know? For his own safety?

The 25th Amendment no longer applies to Trump, so you are comparing apples and oranges.

Oompa Loompa · Jun 27, 2024

JustOneWay said:
The 25th Amendment no longer applies to Trump, so you are comparing apples and oranges.

I am talking about Biden. If we are to hold Biden and Trump to the same standard, Biden should be tried for mishandling classified documents and sharing classified information with his ghost writer, or removed from office under the 25th ammendment. If Biden is unfit to be accountable for the very thing his DOJ raided Trump's home, then Biden is not fit to remain in office. Any other option suggests that there is a hypocritical double standard in our justice system that favors the DNC. But as Fantine said,

Fantine said:
Ps 106:3 Blessed are those who uphold justice.

I would rejoice that justice had been done twice.

Apparently Psalm 106:3 is not something the DNC respects.

JustOneWay · Jun 27, 2024

Oompa Loompa said:
I am talking about Biden. If we are to hold Biden and Trump to the same standard, Biden should be tried for mishandling classified documents and sharing classified information with his ghost writer, or removed from office under the 25th ammendment. If Biden is unfit to be accountable for the very thing his DOJ raided Trump's home, then Biden is not fit to remain in office. Any other option suggests that there is a hypocritical double standard in our justice system that favors the DNC. But as Fantine said,

Apparently Psalm 106:3 is not something the DNC respects.

This thread is about Trump. Why are you continually off topic?

JustOneWay · Jun 27, 2024

Oompa Loompa said:
Apparently Psalm 106:3 is not something the DNC respects.

Trump has broken at least half of the Ten Commandments and has shown no remorse in doing so. Remember that when you vote for Trump.

Red State AG Slaps New York With Lawsuit Over Trump Trial: ‘Unconstitutional Lawfare’

Well-Known Member

Dona Quixote

Domine non-sum dignus

Newbie

Mad Scientist

Well-Known Member

Dona Quixote

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic

Well-Known Member

Dona Quixote

Well-Known Member

:)

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

Well-Known Member

:)

Well-Known Member

:)

:)

Similar threads