there are so many leaps of logic and assumptions made in your statement
1. My acceptance of Women as pastors is not dependent on my view of Ellen G White. I do not accept Her as a prophet. So I do not defend her, her prophetic ministry is dependant on the accuracy of her prophecies, not her gender. Being a woman does not negate the Holy Spirit gifting women for ministry. As Acts 21:8,9
8Leaving the next day, we reached Caesarea and stayed at the house of Philip the evangelist, one of the Seven.
9 He had
four unmarried daughters who prophesied. So that objection is not valid.
SDA theology stands and falls on its accuracy in its interpretation of Scripture. EGW did not write any of the doctrines of the SDA church. Her role is in endorsing the doctrines. Because of her claim to prophetic authority, she locks into place the doctrines. if there is an error in the doctrines then you cannot change them without EGW losing her claim to prophetic authority. That is the big problem. That is why I am a Seventh-day Evangelical Adventist. I use the same tools as everyone else. I think their system is the best for interpretation and practice. The teaching needs some adjustment.
There are different reasons for people Denying or accepting women's ordination. The problem with the churches listed above is that .....
1. They largely reject the authority of scripture, they are humanist and evolutionist, and they deny the creator, the created order, the Garden of Eden, the Fall, and the Curse. they base everything on equality and do not look at sin and circumstance.
2. A biblical view for women as pastors is based on being born again, the gift of the Holy Spirit, being a new creation, and the Law written on the Heart. Paul's statements on women being silent and not having authority are seen as local and circumstantial. We don't care if it is a man or a women as long as God speaks and get His way. Gender is irrelevant. Traditionalists either deny, ignore, or denigrate this view because it does not fit with their interpretation.
3. The Traditional view is that Paul's statements are universal and binding in all circumstances.