• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Supreme Court turns down porn group’s plea to block Texas age-verification law

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
183,879
67,043
Woods
✟6,023,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
The U.S. Supreme Court on Tuesday declined a request from the porn industry to block a Texas age-verification rule, allowing the law to stand and temporarily derailing the efforts of porn creators to see the new safety measure scuttled.

The court said in an unsigned order without comment that it was denying a request from the Free Speech Coalition to issue a stay on the law. The Free Speech Coalition includes a porn trade association and several pornography creators.

Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton has defended the law, HB 1181, since its passage last summer. The measure requires porn websites to institute “reasonable age-verification methods” to ensure minors are not accessing explicit sexual content on their sites.

The attorney general has sued multiple pornography companies in order to enforce the age-verification law. He argued earlier this year that pornography sites “are on the run because Texas has a law that aims to prevent them from showing harmful, obscene material to children.”

Continued below.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: DJWhalen

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
183,879
67,043
Woods
✟6,023,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I guess it might be triggering for some people?
Well the word is all over the place and in Christian articles. A word triggering? :scratch: Is there a better term for what it is?
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,563
21,649
29
Nebraska
✟817,488.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Well the word is all over the place and in Christian article. A word triggering? :scratch: Is there a better term for what it is?
I’m not sure. I really don’t know.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
183,879
67,043
Woods
✟6,023,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Sexploitation?

Vulgar smut?

Exploited Sex trafficking actors for our personal enjoyment?

Indecent lust driven filth factories?

I don’t know either but as long as p-orn is mentioned the link is dead.
 
Upvote 0

RileyG

Veteran
Christian Forums Staff
Moderator Trainee
Hands-on Trainee
Angels Team
Site Supporter
Feb 10, 2013
37,563
21,649
29
Nebraska
✟817,488.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Celibate
Politics
US-Republican
Sexploitation?

Vulgar smut?

Exploited Sex trafficking actors for our personal enjoyment?

Indecent lust driven filth factories?

I don’t know either but as long as p-orn is mentioned the link is dead.
Some people may have addiction problems and that's why p*rn is blocked. That's my best guess. I really don't know for sure.
 
Upvote 0

Michie

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Feb 5, 2002
183,879
67,043
Woods
✟6,023,066.00
Country
United States
Gender
Female
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Some people may have addiction problems and that's why p*rn is blocked. That's my best guess. I really don't know for sure.
Well there are a lot of good articles where we are making headway defeating this scourge and the reader has to search it out themselves.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RileyG
Upvote 0