This is false. I would NEVER trust an opinion piece from NYPost personally.
1) I would point out that this article actually doens't have a SINGLE piece of useful evidence to support the "it's treatment" answer.
2) In fact, the argument they use is also largely illogical. The argument, essentially, is that "increasing affordable housing isn't the answer because when they did that the problem grew. That is not an logical argument though:
It does not indicated what WOULD have happenned without that increase in funding. What if the houseless population would have increased MORESO?
3) The ever increasing centralization of wealth into fewer and fewer hands and (at the same time) that money disappearing from the poorest people and MORE importantly, the perverse and wild increase in rents that are NOT commensurate with increases in salary.
View attachment 339404
You'll notice that same time frame shows ABOUT a 40% increase in rental costs. You will note in your article that they say that houselessness increase by 21% during that same time.
Seems to suggest it helped a bit.
You know what's funny? I'd be inclined to think that if all the developed governments in the world simply took the wealth away from the richest, say, 100,000 people on the planet, that solve a LOT of debt problems around the world.
Don't say the problem is "over spending", the problem is the centralization of wealth amongst few and fewer people who can control it and SOLELY reap the benefits of hording it like dragons.
It's weird to me how FAR people are from blaming SO many of the world' problems on simply greed