• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Trump Mar-a-Lago security aide flips after changing lawyers

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
7,469
5,131
NW
✟273,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Prosecutors: Trump Mar-a-Lago security aide flipped after changing lawyers

A Trump employee who monitored security cameras at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate abruptly retracted his earlier grand jury testimony and implicated Trump and others in obstruction of justice just after switching from an attorney paid for by a Trump political action committee to a lawyer from the federal defender’s office in Washington, prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday.

The aide — described as “Trump Employee 4” in public court filings but identified elsewhere as Yuscil Taveras — held the title of director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago. He initially testified to a grand jury in Washington, D.C., that he was unaware of any effort to erase the videos, but after getting the new attorney “immediately … retracted his prior false testimony” and detailed the alleged effort to tamper with evidence related to the investigation of the handling of classified information stored at Trump’s Florida home, the new submission said.

Taveras’ reversal led directly to new charges against Trump that Smith’s prosecutors included in a superseding indictment issued by a federal grand jury in Miami last month, detailing alleged efforts to erase the security camera recordings, prosecutors said. Nauta had been charged in the initial indictment, but de Oliveira was added as a defendant only in the revised indictment.

In an apparent bid to assuage any continuing concerns by Cannon about a grand jury hundred of miles away working on matters related to the case she is handling, Smith’s team informed her that the D.C. grand jury officially completed its work Aug. 17.
 

Gene2memE

Newbie
Oct 22, 2013
4,690
7,260
✟348,810.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
There's a saying in the legal profession: "The real client is the one who pays the bills."

In this case, Mr Taveras lawyer was being paid for by a pro-Trump PAC. His motivation, despite professional standards, wasn't to protect his client. It was to protect who was paying the bills. I suspect that if Nauta and de Oliveira were getting better legal advice, something similar would occur.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,889
16,418
72
Bondi
✟387,340.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
There's a saying in the legal profession: "The real client is the one who pays the bills."

In this case, Mr Taveras lawyer was being paid for by a pro-Trump PAC. His motivation, despite professional standards, wasn't to protect his client. It was to protect who was paying the bills. I suspect that if Nauta and de Oliveira were getting better legal advice, something similar would occur.
Taveras has crumbled. He knows they have evidence that he perjured himself so what's a man to do? Do time for the boss so that the boss might get off? Gimme a break. And now he's a witness for the prosecution.

And de Oliveira will be having night sweats now he know that his statements will be proved to be false. I'll bet he'll crumble as well. He'll jump ship to save his own skin because I reckon he knows that if he doesn't then he's going to go down with the SS Trump.
 
Upvote 0

Handmaid for Jesus

You can't steal my joy
Site Supporter
Dec 19, 2010
25,694
33,093
enroute
✟1,467,190.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
Prosecutors: Trump Mar-a-Lago security aide flipped after changing lawyers

A Trump employee who monitored security cameras at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate abruptly retracted his earlier grand jury testimony and implicated Trump and others in obstruction of justice just after switching from an attorney paid for by a Trump political action committee to a lawyer from the federal defender’s office in Washington, prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday.

The aide — described as “Trump Employee 4” in public court filings but identified elsewhere as Yuscil Taveras — held the title of director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago. He initially testified to a grand jury in Washington, D.C., that he was unaware of any effort to erase the videos, but after getting the new attorney “immediately … retracted his prior false testimony” and detailed the alleged effort to tamper with evidence related to the investigation of the handling of classified information stored at Trump’s Florida home, the new submission said.

Taveras’ reversal led directly to new charges against Trump that Smith’s prosecutors included in a superseding indictment issued by a federal grand jury in Miami last month, detailing alleged efforts to erase the security camera recordings, prosecutors said. Nauta had been charged in the initial indictment, but de Oliveira was added as a defendant only in the revised indictment.

In an apparent bid to assuage any continuing concerns by Cannon about a grand jury hundred of miles away working on matters related to the case she is handling, Smith’s team informed her that the D.C. grand jury officially completed its work Aug. 17.
Good on him. He is learning not to put his trust in "the boss".
 
  • Like
Reactions: JustOneWay
Upvote 0

Pommer

CoPacEtiC SkEpTic
Sep 13, 2008
23,083
14,240
Earth
✟253,890.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Deist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Democrat
Taveras has crumbled. He knows they have evidence that he perjured himself so what's a man to do? Do time for the boss so that the boss might get off? Gimme a break. And now he's a witness for the prosecution.

And de Oliveira will be having night sweats now he know that his statements will be proved to be false. I'll bet he'll crumble as well. He'll jump ship to save his own skin because I reckon he knows that if he doesn't then he's going to go down with the SS Trump.
Here’s to him “staying healthy”! ?
 
Upvote 0

iluvatar5150

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Aug 3, 2012
30,075
29,845
Baltimore
✟807,759.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Democrat
Prosecutors: Trump Mar-a-Lago security aide flipped after changing lawyers

A Trump employee who monitored security cameras at Donald Trump’s Mar-a-Lago estate abruptly retracted his earlier grand jury testimony and implicated Trump and others in obstruction of justice just after switching from an attorney paid for by a Trump political action committee to a lawyer from the federal defender’s office in Washington, prosecutors said in a court filing Tuesday.

The aide — described as “Trump Employee 4” in public court filings but identified elsewhere as Yuscil Taveras — held the title of director of information technology at Mar-a-Lago. He initially testified to a grand jury in Washington, D.C., that he was unaware of any effort to erase the videos, but after getting the new attorney “immediately … retracted his prior false testimony” and detailed the alleged effort to tamper with evidence related to the investigation of the handling of classified information stored at Trump’s Florida home, the new submission said.

Taveras’ reversal led directly to new charges against Trump that Smith’s prosecutors included in a superseding indictment issued by a federal grand jury in Miami last month, detailing alleged efforts to erase the security camera recordings, prosecutors said. Nauta had been charged in the initial indictment, but de Oliveira was added as a defendant only in the revised indictment.

In an apparent bid to assuage any continuing concerns by Cannon about a grand jury hundred of miles away working on matters related to the case she is handling, Smith’s team informed her that the D.C. grand jury officially completed its work Aug. 17.
I wonder if there exist any potential consequences for Woodward. It's easy to imagine how he could've not been acting in the best interests of all of his clients.
 
Upvote 0

NxNW

Well-Known Member
Nov 30, 2019
7,469
5,131
NW
✟273,501.00
Country
United States
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
I wonder if there exist any potential consequences for Woodward. It's easy to imagine how he could've not been acting in the best interests of all of his clients.
That's a great point, and with him retracting false testimony, he may be in a real bind.
 
Upvote 0

Bradskii

Old age should burn and rave at close of day;
Aug 19, 2018
23,889
16,418
72
Bondi
✟387,340.00
Country
Australia
Gender
Male
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
I wonder if there exist any potential consequences for Woodward. It's easy to imagine how he could've not been acting in the best interests of all of his clients.
There was a suggestion (actually by Woodward himself I think) that he could still represent both. Which would have obviously been a conflict of interests. You can hardly aggressively interrogate and question the honesty of one client to protect the other.
 
Upvote 0