Student loan debt: Borrowers brace for Supreme Court decision

I predict the Supreme Court will slap down Biden's plan. This is something Congress should be approaching, not the prez on his lonesome.

ThatRobGuy said:

Agreed...

And it should also be joined at the hip with some discussions/plans as to how address the issues that created the problem in the first place.

Setting the precedent of "we're just going to start forgiving the first $X worth of student loan debt for borrowers" doesn't do anything to change the incentive structure universities had that led them to overcharge in the first place.

Click to expand...

They ought to look at each student and determine whether they've actually paid back the principal borrowed plus a reasonable interest on that amount (say, 6%). If so...consider it paid off.

The criminal part of the system is the way the interest is accrued so heinously beyond the principal. It's a loan sharking scheme the Mafia would love to have.

Sometimes I wonder why people are surprised you have to pay back a loan. It is called a loan for a reason. Unless the definition of loan has changed I can't for the life of me understand the student loan issue in the US.

1. You're not forced to get a student loan. If you can't afford the education of your choice, find another that best and nearest suit your interest and economic conditions.

2. If you get a student loan means you agreed to the terms - interest and all. Now you call for your poor decision to be forgiven due to repayment issue? What backward mentality is that? Don't sign if you are not 100% comfortable with the conditions laid out.

Why can't you be responsible for your own decisions? The world is never ideal. There are gives and takes. Pros and cons. I didn't go to the school I wanted because of my economic REALITY. I know it will burden my parents and me. I willingly gave up on my first, second and even third choice of school due to the fees. And I never regretted it. My parents kept telling me that they can afford my choices (an obvious lie), but I knew from our household it will cause suffering for them. And we are in no way poor. Yet I took their burdens into considerations. I also don't want to burden myself to repay future loans.

I did right by them. I went to school which is not known as a forefront runner in the subject I wanted. It was way cheaper because of it. I made up by being one of the student who graduated with distinction. I started working as soon as I got out. Started as a lowly IT admin. Now I'm proud to have improved my parents lives, they now live a better retirement because I alone can pay for better things.

This is not to brag but to show that your own choices mattered. You make the best of an unideal situation.

ThatRobGuy said:

Actually, the way student loans are calculated (with regards to interest) isn't all that unfair.

SmartAsset provides a nice little calculator for determining it:
View attachment 332903

So on that $50k borrowed, if you stretched it out the full 10 years, you would've ended up paying back around $62k (meaning around $12k worth of interest).

Click to expand...

Yeah, that's how loan sharks present their terms as well. They leave out details such as the interest beginning to accumulate from the first year, but emphasizing that payments don't have to start until after graduation.

ThatRobGuy said:

I still the bigger problem as these schools gleefully signing people up for some of expensive degrees that offer little in the way of job prospects at the end.

Click to expand...

That, too. And all the degrees are expensive.

ThatRobGuy said:

If a student racks up $50k worth of student loan debt on Journalism or Visual & Performing Arts degree (two of the more popular degrees of the last 2 decades.

Even with a 0% interest rate, they're still in trouble.

Click to expand...

But those kinds of degrees are the ones within the capabilities of the majority of people. The majority of people cannot be successful in STEM studies. If you want everyone to get a bachelor's degree, you must push Journalism or Visual & Performing Arts and such.

Makes one wonder what the heck good the counselors in high school and college are. I guess their job is simply to hawk the product. School guidance counselors are like the women that hung outside the bars in the Philippines.

If guidance counselors were really doing the job people think they're doing, they would be telling the majority of high school graduates to get vocational training, not a bachelor's degree.

ThatRobGuy said:

For a person who comes to that realization of "wait a minute, there aren't many jobs in this field and the ones that do exist don't pay as much as the guidance counselor said they do", being on the hook for a decade for $450/month instead of $525 is going to do very little to solve the predicament they find themselves in.

Click to expand...

But they also get bogus information about those jobs, buried under the "undeniable" statistic that any bachelor's degree will give you a better life than any job without one can get you.

ThatRobGuy said:

Agree with most of what you said in your post, with a minor objection here...

I don't think the majority of people have the capabilities of being a good journalist or artist. (emphasis on the latter one)

A person could go to school and spend an extensive amount of time and money trying to learn, and they'll likely get better than the average person or learn a few new techniques, but the artistic is something people have or don't have.

You're not going to be able to "teach" a person to be able to play like Stevie Ray Vaughn.
You're not going to teach someone how to be Brad Pitt or <insert actor here>
You're not going to be able to teach someone how to have an eye/ear for composition and bet able to produce music or movies like Rick Rubin or Quentin Tarantino respectively.


The way I've heard it described before is the difference between "Skilled" and "Gifted". While the two circles do have some overlap, you can teach someone a skill, you can't teach them a gift.

Click to expand...

I didn't say they'd be good. But they could finish the degree program.

I thought you had posed "Journalism or Visual & Performing Arts" as merely examples of soft degrees. It could just as easily be sociology (which is probably more frequent than journalism or visual and performing arts).

ThatRobGuy said:

With regards to sociologists, that's actually got a better-than-expected forecast
View attachment 332913

With several relevant fields (like being a case worker, social worker, counselor, HR), you'd actually be way better off getting a degree in sociology than in Journalism or the Performing Arts.

Click to expand...

I'm not here to debate which soft degrees are better than others...only to point out that they're all weak career fields compared to the cost of the degree.

Right now, sociology degree holders are inventing their own jobs mostly out of thin air or working for the government. The latest scam is DEI. But those positions are parasites on the economy, not profit centers. They don't make any company a dime more money. The upsurge of HR departments after the Civil Rights Act had some utility in helping companies stay legal, but this DEI scam is nothing more than companies being coerced into looking good.

And a good many of those positions stand to be replaced by AI.

There is this thing called personal accountability.

Everything in life costs: marriage, children, cars, home ownership. There are a multitude of grants available, scholarships, community colleges, work programs.

Additionally, the applicant should be able to read and comprehend the terms of the contract, fully understanding how much the costs involved.

When you sign a loan document, you enter a covenant with the lending institution. You give them your word you will repay what you have received.

Our current Whitehouse Octogenarian is buying votes, nothing more, nothing less.

I graduated college in 1981, and he wants me to pay for someone else’s debt through my taxes.