- Oct 29, 2017
- 65,234
- 10,770
- Country
- United States
- Faith
- Messianic
- Marital Status
- Private
Senator Grassley:
"In the end it was the Democrats who introduced Russian disinformation, from a Russian agent, into the investigative record."
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Senator Grassley:
"In the end it was the Democrats who introduced Russian disinformation, from a Russian agent, into the investigative record."
I almost tripped on your bunny hole...If your going to use a "witness" that can't make it 90 seconds without telling blatant lies, why should we listen any longer?
Chuck lies about Crossfire Hurricane right at the top of the "testimony". I stopped watching at that point.I almost tripped on your bunny hole...
...and then I saw that you were unsuccessful to refute the quote.
What is the synopsis of the 15:18 video? (I saw Jim Jordan who chairs a House committee, where does Senator Grassley come in?)
Senator Grassley:
"In the end it was the Democrats who introduced Russian disinformation, from a Russian agent, into the investigative record."
What is the synopsis of the 15:18 video? (I saw Jim Jordan who chairs a House committee, where does Senator Grassley come in?)
The quote posted in the OP best summarizes Grassley's testimony. That's why I chose that one. Grassley begins speaking near the 16 second mark.What is the synopsis of the 15:18 video? (I saw Jim Jordan who chairs a House committee, where does Senator Grassley come in?)
Well you're entitled to your opinion. Maybe you should start a thread on that subject.Chuck lies about Crossfire Hurricane right at the top of the "testimony".
Grassley's statement about CH was incorrect.Well you're entitled to your opinion.
Maybe you should start a thread on that subject.
Again you a free to hold that opinion; but the topic of this thread concerns Hunter's laptop, and Democrats who introduced Russian disinformation, from a Russian agent, into the investigative record.Grassley's statement about CH was incorrect.
It's kind of an old and settled topic, unfortunately Chuck seems compelled to lie about it.
The FBI is in possession of the laptop purportedly belonging to Hunter Biden which contained emails revealing his foreign business dealings, including contacts in Ukraine and China, two senior administration officials told Fox News Tuesday.What laptop? Has anyone produced an actual photo of it yet, or is it just something the exists in the fevered imaginations of conservatives?
I'm noticing a theme among people when they're shown to be wrong, a very common quote i'm seeing on CF is "blatant lies" "they're lying" etc.If your going to use a "witness" that can't make it 90 seconds without telling blatant lies, why should we listen any longer?
And just eight minutes, forty five seconds we get to your “synopsis” quote. Succinct.The quote posted in the OP best summarizes Grassley's testimony. That's why I chose that one. Grassley begins speaking near the 16 second mark.
It might be productive to put Hunter on the hot seat to answer a few questions; but maybe Joe's FBI is still conducting a full investigation.One thing that the video seems to leave out:
What did Hunter do in his China dealings that was actually illegal?
I mean, come on, House Republicans. Nail this guy. I want to see a report that details actual illegal business with China. Then we can put this vile criminal away for good!
Grassley said that Crossfire-Hurricane was politically motivated, the very point of Michael Horowitz’s investigation into the investigators’ motives.I'm noticing a theme among people when they're shown to be wrong, a very common quote i'm seeing on CF is "blatant lies" "they're lying" etc.
Which honestly makes sense, if you want to disprove someone just say they're lying, because when you try to refute it that just makes it look like you're defending a lie. Very good tactic but anyone who can see will see past that tactic.
If there is nothing to be concerned about; why did Joe lie about it?Why is having contact with the Chinese by private citizens not running for political office “concerning”?
Hunter will probably just plead the 5th. He knows we have more than enough innuendo to deal with him now.It might be productive to put Hunter on the hot seat to answer a few questions; but maybe Joe's FBI is still conducting a full investigation.