- Nov 14, 2022
- 32
- 11
- 48
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Private
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
How could that be as Revelation calls them "two prophets"?The argument is too long to be presented briefly, but the premise in my own book is that the "Two witnesses" are not two human individuals at all.
The picture in Revelation ch11 represents the faithful Christian community witnessing in a double capacity- against persecution (the powers of Moses indicating the function of Moses), and also against idolatry and unfaithfulness (the powers of Elijah indicating the function of Elijah).
That label is part of the picture being presented. It is a question of how literally every detail in that book is meant to be taken. You will remember that Jesus was going to ask his Father to send out harvesters into the field. "Being literal" is not always the best answer.How could that be as Revelation calls them "two prophets"?
I'm not buying what your selling. Revelation 11 says that they are "two prophets" who "rise from the dead". What you are saying doesn't make sense.That label is part of the picture being presented. It is a question of how literally every detail in that book is meant to be taken. You will remember that Jesus was going to ask his Father to send out harvesters into the field. "Being literal" is not always the best answer.
If you really read through the passages about the two witness and the power they hold, it is obvious it is no mere man nor is it a group or nation or even all the Christians collectively. Who has this kind of power ? Think about it.
Hi Stephen, welcome to the forum.That label is part of the picture being presented. It is a question of how literally every detail in that book is meant to be taken. You will remember that Jesus was going to ask his Father to send out harvesters into the field. "Being literal" is not always the best answer.
It seems that they've stated that the 1260 days hasn't yet started.Well, just give it three and a half years then reevaluate the claims of these people in the OP.
I don’t know if the two witnesses can be identified with 100% assurance, so I’m not arguing whether they are the church witnessing during the “church age” or not.However, if the witnesses in Revelation ch11 are the witnessing church community, then their martyrdom and resurrection represents the martydom and final resurrection of the witnessing community.
Yeah, right.It seems that they've stated that the 1260 days hasn't yet started.
To me, the "conquering of the saints" looks like a successful large-scale persecution, described again in v15 of the same chapter. That is, many would be martyred and the rest would go "underground". The same point is being made several times over.I don’t know if the two witnesses can be identified with 100% assurance, so I’m not arguing whether they are the church witnessing during the “church age” or not.
When John the Baptist questioned whether Jesus was the one, this seems to me that he was overcome. After all John the Baptist is the one who baptized Jesus and declared him to be the Lamb of God.
In Revelation 13:7 the beast overcomes the saints. I think this overcoming is best equated with John the Baptist questioning Jesus.
If the two witnesses are the church and the church is the saints, do you think the church will be overcome in a similar manner?
I see that, in Revelation 11:7 there are three things that happen to the two witnesses, war, overcome, and killed.To me, the "conquering of the saints" looks like a successful large-scale persecution, described again in v15 of the same chapter. That is, many would be martyred and the rest would go "underground". The same point is being made several times over.
In brief, I think they would be conquered outwardly but not inwardly. Look back to the beginning of ch11; the area of those who worship is NOT given over to the nations when the holy city is trampled upon. That is the same kind of promise as that the gates of hell will not prevail, and refers, i believe, to the inward preservation of their faith (which is part of what is guaranteed by their "sealing" in ch7). The overcoming is outward, as I suggested earlier, and also temporary, as shown by the end of ch11 and by the end of Revelation as a whole. That assurance is the whole point of giving this book for the benefit of a church under persecution.I see that, in Revelation 11:7 there are three things that happen to the two witnesses, war, overcome, and killed.
In Revelation 13:7 the beast makes war and overcomes. As you say when we get to verse 15 we see them being killed.
Here’s the problem for me, if this is referring to the church it goes against promises such as gates of hell will not prevail and that I will never leave thee or forsake thee.
Also in Daniel 7:25 they (saints) are given into his hand. I can understand if the “saints” is referring to Old Testament saints but not if it’s referring to New Testament saints.
Will the church be given to the beast?
Ok, thanks for that explanation.In brief, I think they would be conquered outwardly but not inwardly. Look back to the beginning of ch11; the area of those who worship is NOT given over to the nations when the holy city is trampled upon. That is the same kind of promise as that the gates of hell will not prevail, and refers, i believe, to the inward preservation of their faith (which is part of what is guaranteed by their "sealing" in ch7). The overcoming is outward, as I suggested earlier, and also temporary, as shown by the end of ch11 and by the end of Revelation as a whole. That assurance is the whole point of giving this book for the benefit of a church under persecution.
It helps if you keep in mind that words can mean different things in different circumstances. A child may be "big" in elation to a baby sister, and yet "little" in relation to a teenager. In the case of "overcome" the key is the difference between inward and outward. The churches are being told to "overcome" in the sense of preserving their faith, though some of them will be killed. The "overcoming" by the beast in ch11 and ch13 is purely outward. He thinks he's won, but he hasn't.Ok, thanks for that explanation.
One other thing that seems kinda off is that in Revelation 2 and 3 each of the churches are told they must overcome to be saved. The two witnesses are overcome and yet we know they are saved because they are resurrected.
Here’s what seems off, the saints will overcome while at the same time the beast will overcome. Since the Bible is written from the perspective of the believer, why would a believer think the beast is overcoming them? We know this is Gods will and hence our will.
Ok, so from the beasts perspective he has overcome but from the believers perspective the beast hasn’t.It helps if you keep in mind that words can mean different things in different circumstances. A child may be "big" in elation to a baby sister, and yet "little" in relation to a teenager. In the case of "overcome" the key is the difference between inward and outward. The churches are being told to "overcome" in the sense of preserving their faith, though some of them will be killed. The "overcoming" by the beast in ch11 and ch13 is purely outward. He thinks he's won, but he hasn't.