- Apr 13, 2006
- 28,203
- 15,917
- Faith
- Christian
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- CA-Greens
Which correlations concern you. Mine is everything connected to education.
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Which correlations concern you. Mine is everything connected to education.
I notice that correlation is not causation.
Correction - correlation may not indicate causation but it doesn't discount that causation may existI notice that correlation is not causation.
Pretty picture:
Which correlations concern you. Mine is everything connected to education.
Which correlations concern you. Mine is everything connected to education.
I'm happy to show stats of the South being a low performer all around if you like. But when I've put up that information in other threads, folks on the right have generally just ignored it.Pretty picture:
No link showing actual stats
Baptist are Protestants - so why the two
Quality looks like a middle schooler did it.
But the picture of the Wookie was interesting. But there is quite a bit of obscenity there also.
The main difference is that your map is blocked by state as the smallest unit while the other one seems to be by county.Actual diabetes map....by state....
View attachment 324602
That's odd....seems to be a slight difference.
Obviously the South has yet to fully recover from the devastation wreaked by the War of Northern Aggression.
Which correlations concern you. Mine is everything connected to education.
I notice that there appears to be snow flurries drifting acrost it.
Which correlations concern you. Mine is everything connected to education.
And yet.... how do you reconcile that people are migrating to those area's that are such 'low performers'?I'm happy to show stats of the South being a low performer all around if you like. But when I've put up that information in other threads, folks on the right have generally just ignored it.
What's to reconcile? It makes complete sense. Because "housing is cheap" and they have no where else in the US they can afford to live. That doesn't make the destination better; just the desperation that high. Hopefully the influx of new citizens will be willing to hold their elected officials to a standard that will create a better opportunities and supports for everyone around them, instead of buying into it.And yet.... how do you reconcile that people are migrating to those area's that are such 'low performers'?
Yeah....across the whole forum. Not a huge fan of that feature...I notice that there appears to be snow flurries drifting acrost it.
You can remove it.Yeah....across the whole forum. Not a huge fan of that feature...
Where exactly are these images from and why should we trust them? I notice that the map Ana the Ist posted showed STDs and diabetes differently from the map you did (to be fair, yours said "venereal disease" and his said "STDs" so perhaps the other STDs were more common in the other states). So whose chart should be trusted?
Which correlations concern you. Mine is everything connected to education.
It actually is a good indicator of how racist policies (or policies that started out as racist and migrated to being merely classist) have shaped certain aspects of American society.Where exactly are these images from and why should we trust them? I notice that the map Ana the Ist posted showed STDs and diabetes differently from the map you did (to be fair, yours said "venereal disease" and his said "STDs" so perhaps the other STDs were more common in the other states). So whose chart should be trusted?
But let's show another map, which may make some people a little uncomfortable when viewed in conjunction with the maps you showed. The key is unfortunately not in the image itself (one can find it on the page though, Six maps that reveal America’s expanding racial diversity) but it's based om places that have a high presence of racial minorities.
Brown: Blacks
Blue: Asians, Native Hawaiians, an d Other Pacific Islanders
Light blue: American Indians/Alaska Natives
Green: Hispanics
Light green: Two or more minorities
White: No minority is highly represented
So here we go:
View attachment 324771
One notices the interesting fact that the "bad" maps you posted correspond rather strongly to where we see racial minorities being prominent, especially blacks.
Indeed, it seems that a white supremacist could quite happily use your charts to prove their claims of non-white people, particularly blacks, being inferior. But I have the feeling that you (and presumably whoever made that image to begin with) would disagree on that.
Disclaimer: I'm not a white supremacist. Just pointing out how easily a white supremacist could turn the argument around and use it to support their beliefs.