• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Quirinius serving as governor of Syria and duumvir of Pisidean Antioch simultaneously

JK2021

Member
Feb 20, 2021
21
4
Surrey
✟23,020.00
Country
Canada
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Is it possible for Quirinius to have served as governor of Syria from 3-1 bce while simultaneously serving the first year as duumvir? I've read that following the defeat of the Homonades in Galatia he was appointed as duumvir of Pisidean Antioch and that he served as legate of that province fro 5-3 bce as he was fighting them there. The reason I ask is because some Christian apologists state that he served his first term as governor of Syria from 4-1 bce while he was fighting in Cilicia and that king Herod actually died in 1 bce. The problem is that it would be very difficult to serve two positions simultaneously I'd imagine. I'm also unsure if people ever held two positions at once in ancient Rome. I am aware of other explanations but let's assume this one is right.
 
Last edited:

Jonaitis

Soli Deo Gloria
Jan 4, 2019
5,360
4,307
Wyoming
✟150,247.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Protestant
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Is it possible for Quirinius to have served as governor of Syria from 3-1 bce while simultaneously serving the first year as duumvir? I've read that following the defeat of the Homonades in Galatia he was appointed as duumvir of Pisidean Antioch and that he served as legate of that province fro 5-3 bce as he was fighting them there. The reason I ask is because some Christian apologists state that he served his first term as governor of Syria from 4-1 bce while he was fighting in Cilicia and that king Herod actually died in 1 bce. The problem is that it would be very difficult to serve two positions simultaneously I'd imagine. I'm also unsure if people ever held two positions at once in ancient Rome. I am aware of other explanations but let's assume this one is right.
If true, how do you work a census under Quirinius' office during that time?

6 CE is the only reasonable dating for Luke's account: after Augustus disposed Herod Archelaus, he had the Judean province annexed to Syria under Quirinius, which prompted a census for the Judean inhabitants. Not only does this closely match Luke's account, but this is historically verified, unlike many of the speculations that some apologists argue.

It seems that whenever history is not in our favor, we need to question it or find some other solution.
 
Upvote 0